Ok so it was... night 4 roleblock on Roden.In post 4689, Save The Dragons wrote:i rb'd you last night
CONTROL - GAME OVER!
Forum rules
- NorwegianboyEE
-
NorwegianboyEE Survivor
- NorwegianboyEE
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 24002
- Joined: August 25, 2019
- Location: Norway
- NorwegianboyEE
-
NorwegianboyEE Survivor
- NorwegianboyEE
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 24002
- Joined: August 25, 2019
- Location: Norway
Roden got molded... Night 4.In post 4517, Roden wrote:I got molded. Pretty sure this means it isn't a 3P ability because scum wouldn't just leave me alone. Also pretty sure this means Mastina is town? Night 2 having no mold victims might be because the Vig killed the intended target.
Also, why is both Bell and the Mush slot dead? I really don't think the Vig would kill one of them, but I don't see us having two groupscum at this point either.
So that means that STD roleblocked them and they also got molded on night 4.- mastina
-
mastina SheFalse Prophet
- mastina
She- False Prophet
- False Prophet
- Posts: 16052
- Joined: October 7, 2016
- Pronoun: She
- Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA
- Contact:
Yes.In post 6422, The Three Bears wrote:So you're treating this as 2vs4?
There's three possible worlds.
World number one: mold is a scum ability. That means it is a 2v4. So the correct option is to treat it as such.
World number two: mold is a 3p ability, but the 3p is non-malevolent. In that situation, the 3p is not a threat to the town and I can't think of a single player here who, if they were 3p (barring tictac but tictac is just scum), hasn't shown genuine scumhunting. You, Norwee, Roden, Ceph, all have shown what, if you were 3p, would be real scumhunting. So the 3p in this scenario still helps the town in eliminating the scum, tictac.
World number three: mold is a 3p ability, and is malevolent. In this situation, we still aim for eliminating scum, and leave eliminating the mold to the last remaining scum. We, admittedly, cannot prevent the malevolent mold from winning on its own by votes, but presumably, the scum would not be able to win with the mold either and thus would need to eliminate the mold in order to win.
In all three worlds, we aim to eliminate two scum. And I still believe we are in the first world.
Oh, that.In post 6408, The Three Bears wrote:I detailed about fake voting to force the scummy people to vote first.
Well, it seems tictac is refusing to play along, given...This is a scumclaim from tictac.
It's refusing to take a stance.
It's refusing to do what you asked.
And more than that? Given the mold claims, it's also a scumclaim since a no-yeet would allow for another player to get molded, not to mention, another player to be nightkilled.
There is absolutely 0 reasons for a town player to vote no-yeet so this is just tictac trying to cut losses.- Cephrir
-
Cephrir he/himGoodfellas / Best Social Game
- Cephrir
he/him- Goodfellas / Best Social Game
- Goodfellas / Best Social Game
- Posts: 22778
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
And I believe he sent a letter to a dead person Night 5, so we can't confirm or deny on that basis.In post 6426, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Roden got molded... Night 4.In post 4517, Roden wrote:I got molded. Pretty sure this means it isn't a 3P ability because scum wouldn't just leave me alone. Also pretty sure this means Mastina is town? Night 2 having no mold victims might be because the Vig killed the intended target.
Also, why is both Bell and the Mush slot dead? I really don't think the Vig would kill one of them, but I don't see us having two groupscum at this point either.
So that means that STD roleblocked them and they also got molded on night 4."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener- Cephrir
-
Cephrir he/himGoodfellas / Best Social Game
- Cephrir
he/him- Goodfellas / Best Social Game
- Goodfellas / Best Social Game
- Posts: 22778
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
finally, some senseIn post 6427, mastina wrote:There is absolutely 0 reasons for a town player to vote no-yeet so this is just tictac trying to cut losses."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener- NorwegianboyEE
-
NorwegianboyEE Survivor
- NorwegianboyEE
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 24002
- Joined: August 25, 2019
- Location: Norway
Weren’t you in favour of no yeet yesterday too?In post 6429, Cephrir wrote:
finally, some senseIn post 6427, mastina wrote:There is absolutely 0 reasons for a town player to vote no-yeet so this is just tictac trying to cut losses.- NorwegianboyEE
-
NorwegianboyEE Survivor
- NorwegianboyEE
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 24002
- Joined: August 25, 2019
- Location: Norway
- NorwegianboyEE
-
NorwegianboyEE Survivor
- NorwegianboyEE
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 24002
- Joined: August 25, 2019
- Location: Norway
- Cephrir
-
Cephrir he/himGoodfellas / Best Social Game
- Cephrir
he/him- Goodfellas / Best Social Game
- Goodfellas / Best Social Game
- Posts: 22778
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Yes.In post 6430, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
Weren’t you in favour of no yeet yesterday too?In post 6429, Cephrir wrote:
finally, some senseIn post 6427, mastina wrote:There is absolutely 0 reasons for a town player to vote no-yeet so this is just tictac trying to cut losses.
That was before it was pointed out that that could lead to everyone getting molded. It's also worse today as our wiggle room on that front is now gone."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener- Cephrir
-
Cephrir he/himGoodfellas / Best Social Game
- Cephrir
he/him- Goodfellas / Best Social Game
- Goodfellas / Best Social Game
- Posts: 22778
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
- The Three Bears
-
The Three Bears Mafia Scum
- The Three Bears
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: December 29, 2021
- The Three Bears
-
The Three Bears Mafia Scum
- The Three Bears
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: December 29, 2021
OK, so why in your mind is Tictac not been yeet yet as an ascetic who should've been gone long ago, and do you think the power balance and flips indicates a 4 person scumteam?In post 6427, mastina wrote:
Yes.In post 6422, The Three Bears wrote:So you're treating this as 2vs4?
There's three possible worlds.
World number one: mold is a scum ability. That means it is a 2v4. So the correct option is to treat it as such.
World number two: mold is a 3p ability, but the 3p is non-malevolent. In that situation, the 3p is not a threat to the town and I can't think of a single player here who, if they were 3p (barring tictac but tictac is just scum), hasn't shown genuine scumhunting. You, Norwee, Roden, Ceph, all have shown what, if you were 3p, would be real scumhunting. So the 3p in this scenario still helps the town in eliminating the scum, tictac.
World number three: mold is a 3p ability, and is malevolent. In this situation, we still aim for eliminating scum, and leave eliminating the mold to the last remaining scum. We, admittedly, cannot prevent the malevolent mold from winning on its own by votes, but presumably, the scum would not be able to win with the mold either and thus would need to eliminate the mold in order to win.
In all three worlds, we aim to eliminate two scum. And I still believe we are in the first world.
Oh, that.In post 6408, The Three Bears wrote:I detailed about fake voting to force the scummy people to vote first.
Well, it seems tictac is refusing to play along, given...This is a scumclaim from tictac.
It's refusing to take a stance.
It's refusing to do what you asked.
And more than that? Given the mold claims, it's also a scumclaim since a no-yeet would allow for another player to get molded, not to mention, another player to be nightkilled.
There is absolutely 0 reasons for a town player to vote no-yeet so this is just tictac trying to cut losses.
What do you think the mold actually does? If you're aware of the lore around it, do you see it matching up?a beary good hydra \o/- NorwegianboyEE
-
NorwegianboyEE Survivor
- NorwegianboyEE
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 24002
- Joined: August 25, 2019
- Location: Norway
- mastina
-
mastina SheFalse Prophet
- mastina
She- False Prophet
- False Prophet
- Posts: 16052
- Joined: October 7, 2016
- Pronoun: She
- Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA
- Contact:
Tictac wasn't yeeted D1 because if you look at tictacs iso, D1 posting was actually reasonably good. It was not egregious enough to be worthy of a D1 yeet.In post 6436, The Three Bears wrote:
OK, so why in your mind is Tictac not been yeet yet as an ascetic who should've been gone long ago, and do you think the power balance and flips indicates a 4 person scumteam?In post 6427, mastina wrote:
Yes.In post 6422, The Three Bears wrote:So you're treating this as 2vs4?
There's three possible worlds.
World number one: mold is a scum ability. That means it is a 2v4. So the correct option is to treat it as such.
World number two: mold is a 3p ability, but the 3p is non-malevolent. In that situation, the 3p is not a threat to the town and I can't think of a single player here who, if they were 3p (barring tictac but tictac is just scum), hasn't shown genuine scumhunting. You, Norwee, Roden, Ceph, all have shown what, if you were 3p, would be real scumhunting. So the 3p in this scenario still helps the town in eliminating the scum, tictac.
World number three: mold is a 3p ability, and is malevolent. In this situation, we still aim for eliminating scum, and leave eliminating the mold to the last remaining scum. We, admittedly, cannot prevent the malevolent mold from winning on its own by votes, but presumably, the scum would not be able to win with the mold either and thus would need to eliminate the mold in order to win.
In all three worlds, we aim to eliminate two scum. And I still believe we are in the first world.
Oh, that.In post 6408, The Three Bears wrote:I detailed about fake voting to force the scummy people to vote first.
Well, it seems tictac is refusing to play along, given...This is a scumclaim from tictac.
It's refusing to take a stance.
It's refusing to do what you asked.
And more than that? Given the mold claims, it's also a scumclaim since a no-yeet would allow for another player to get molded, not to mention, another player to be nightkilled.
There is absolutely 0 reasons for a town player to vote no-yeet so this is just tictac trying to cut losses.
What do you think the mold actually does? If you're aware of the lore around it, do you see it matching up?
Tictac wasn't yeeted D2 because we eliminated a different scumbag that day.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D3 because Tet erroneously believed that there was a guilty on TWIE.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D4 because we yeeted a different scumbag that day.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D5 because y'all decided to gamethrow by yeeting Galron. THIS was the day that Tictac SHOULD have been yeeted.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D6 because Toogeloo decided that fakeclaiming as town was somehow a good idea. If not D5, THIS was the day we should've yeeted Tictac, and we probably WOULD have, if not for the fakeclaim.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D7 because we erroneously believed that yesterday was Mylo. HAD WE KNOWN that it wasn't Mylo on D7, we SHOULD have yeeted Tictac. But since we didn't, we operated under false ideas.
Gotta go.- mastina
-
mastina SheFalse Prophet
- mastina
She- False Prophet
- False Prophet
- Posts: 16052
- Joined: October 7, 2016
- Pronoun: She
- Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA
- Contact:
Sorry, this post isn't finished; special work stuff tonight interrupted me. Can't finish, gotta rotatez but I'll redo the post when first able to.In post 6438, mastina wrote:
Tictac wasn't yeeted D1 because if you look at tictacs iso, D1 posting was actually reasonably good. It was not egregious enough to be worthy of a D1 yeet.In post 6436, The Three Bears wrote:
OK, so why in your mind is Tictac not been yeet yet as an ascetic who should've been gone long ago, and do you think the power balance and flips indicates a 4 person scumteam?In post 6427, mastina wrote:
Yes.In post 6422, The Three Bears wrote:So you're treating this as 2vs4?
There's three possible worlds.
World number one: mold is a scum ability. That means it is a 2v4. So the correct option is to treat it as such.
World number two: mold is a 3p ability, but the 3p is non-malevolent. In that situation, the 3p is not a threat to the town and I can't think of a single player here who, if they were 3p (barring tictac but tictac is just scum), hasn't shown genuine scumhunting. You, Norwee, Roden, Ceph, all have shown what, if you were 3p, would be real scumhunting. So the 3p in this scenario still helps the town in eliminating the scum, tictac.
World number three: mold is a 3p ability, and is malevolent. In this situation, we still aim for eliminating scum, and leave eliminating the mold to the last remaining scum. We, admittedly, cannot prevent the malevolent mold from winning on its own by votes, but presumably, the scum would not be able to win with the mold either and thus would need to eliminate the mold in order to win.
In all three worlds, we aim to eliminate two scum. And I still believe we are in the first world.
Oh, that.In post 6408, The Three Bears wrote:I detailed about fake voting to force the scummy people to vote first.
Well, it seems tictac is refusing to play along, given...This is a scumclaim from tictac.
It's refusing to take a stance.
It's refusing to do what you asked.
And more than that? Given the mold claims, it's also a scumclaim since a no-yeet would allow for another player to get molded, not to mention, another player to be nightkilled.
There is absolutely 0 reasons for a town player to vote no-yeet so this is just tictac trying to cut losses.
What do you think the mold actually does? If you're aware of the lore around it, do you see it matching up?
Tictac wasn't yeeted D2 because we eliminated a different scumbag that day.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D3 because Tet erroneously believed that there was a guilty on TWIE.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D4 because we yeeted a different scumbag that day.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D5 because y'all decided to gamethrow by yeeting Galron. THIS was the day that Tictac SHOULD have been yeeted.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D6 because Toogeloo decided that fakeclaiming as town was somehow a good idea. If not D5, THIS was the day we should've yeeted Tictac, and we probably WOULD have, if not for the fakeclaim.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D7 because we erroneously believed that yesterday was Mylo. HAD WE KNOWN that it wasn't Mylo on D7, we SHOULD have yeeted Tictac. But since we didn't, we operated under false ideas.
Gotta go.- tictac
-
tictac Mafia Scum
- tictac
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2737
- Joined: May 24, 2015
odds of a vote being correct in 2v4: 2/5In post 6427, mastina wrote:This is a scumclaim from tictac.
It's refusing to take a stance.
It's refusing to do what you asked.
And more than that? Given the mold claims, it's also a scumclaim since a no-yeet would allow for another player to get molded, not to mention, another player to be nightkilled.
There is absolutely 0 reasons for a town player to vote no-yeet so this is just tictac trying to cut losses.
odds of a vote being correct in 2v3: 2/4 (> 2/5)
price of a wrong yeet is the same in both
2 votes and no hammer in 2v4 -> min 1 quaranteed scum in pool of 3
1 vote and no hammer in 2v3 -> min1 quaranteed scum in pool of 2
2v3 mech is way better than 2v4 mech.
i'll grant that molding may happen (if norw is town), but don't have a reason to think it has a relevant mech effect at all.
lets compare Titus protocol with doing literally thee opposite in a general case:
1. scummiest player votes (who probably has a poor voting history) then other players vote in a pool that contains that player
2. towniest player votes (who probably has a good voting history) then other player vote in a pool that containsthat towny player
it's pretty easy to see that option 1 goes thru 2 poor odds in order to lead to a coordinated scumyeet when option 2 goes thru 2 better odds.
it trades odds of success for avoidance of responsibility 4 the townie players just because it's more pleasant 4 them and they can.
u spent the day hardpushing me. is the reason u don't have a vote down just cause u think compliance w arbitrary rules is cool?
if i can't have a no-yeet i'm probs voting u, not even 4 this, but cause i think ur stance on molding as a guarantee townstamp from scum is too naive to be believable.
i'd rather do the noyeet tho, so i'll give it 24h yet.- NorwegianboyEE
-
NorwegianboyEE Survivor
- NorwegianboyEE
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 24002
- Joined: August 25, 2019
- Location: Norway
- mastina
-
mastina SheFalse Prophet
- mastina
She- False Prophet
- False Prophet
- Posts: 16052
- Joined: October 7, 2016
- Pronoun: She
- Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA
- Contact:
This is egregiously wrong in a way to, using your own words, is a stance too naive to be believable.In post 6440, tictac wrote:
odds of a vote being correct in 2v4: 2/5In post 6427, mastina wrote:This is a scumclaim from tictac.
It's refusing to take a stance.
It's refusing to do what you asked.
And more than that? Given the mold claims, it's also a scumclaim since a no-yeet would allow for another player to get molded, not to mention, another player to be nightkilled.
There is absolutely 0 reasons for a town player to vote no-yeet so this is just tictac trying to cut losses.
odds of a vote being correct in 2v3: 2/4 (> 2/5)
price of a wrong yeet is the same in both
2 votes and no hammer in 2v4 -> min 1 quaranteed scum in pool of 3
1 vote and no hammer in 2v3 -> min1 quaranteed scum in pool of 2
2v3 mech is way better than 2v4 mech.
i'll grant that molding may happen (if norw is town), but don't have a reason to think it has a relevant mech effect at all.
lets compare Titus protocol with doing literally thee opposite in a general case:
1. scummiest player votes (who probably has a poor voting history) then other players vote in a pool that contains that player
2. towniest player votes (who probably has a good voting history) then other player vote in a pool that containsthat towny player
it's pretty easy to see that option 1 goes thru 2 poor odds in order to lead to a coordinated scumyeet when option 2 goes thru 2 better odds.
it trades odds of success for avoidance of responsibility 4 the townie players just because it's more pleasant 4 them and they can.
u spent the day hardpushing me. is the reason u don't have a vote down just cause u think compliance w arbitrary rules is cool?
if i can't have a no-yeet i'm probs voting u, not even 4 this, but cause i think ur stance on molding as a guarantee townstamp from scum is too naive to be believable.
i'd rather do the noyeet tho, so i'll give it 24h yet.
In a vacuum, yes, lylo is better than Mylo.
We are not in a vacuum.
In this game, we both have a very obvious nighykill in the form of Three Bears (they are a universal townread with BOATLOADS of reasons to be town), but ALSO the looming threat of the mold.
You are blatantly and egregiously ignoring the very real threat that the mold possesses. And a nolim just means that someone who we COULD have had contributing, would instead be dead.
That, and even your stated reason for scumreading me is bullshit.
If every claim of being molded were a townstamp as you're saying that I am saying, then it'd mean that the scumteam would be precisely you+Norwee. Is that a scumteam which I have proposed?
…No?
…Yeah, thought not.
So, OBVIOUSLY, mold is not a guaranteed town stamp. One of Ceph/Roden MUST be scum. In other words, this post is bullshit in every way.- mastina
-
mastina SheFalse Prophet
- mastina
She- False Prophet
- False Prophet
- Posts: 16052
- Joined: October 7, 2016
- Pronoun: She
- Location: Between Snohomish and Monroe, WA
- Contact:
Back to this:In post 6439, mastina wrote:
Sorry, this post isn't finished; special work stuff tonight interrupted me. Can't finish, gotta rotatez but I'll redo the post when first able to.In post 6438, mastina wrote:
Tictac wasn't yeeted D1 because if you look at tictacs iso, D1 posting was actually reasonably good. It was not egregious enough to be worthy of a D1 yeet.In post 6436, The Three Bears wrote:
OK, so why in your mind is Tictac not been yeet yet as an ascetic who should've been gone long ago, and do you think the power balance and flips indicates a 4 person scumteam?In post 6427, mastina wrote:
Yes.In post 6422, The Three Bears wrote:So you're treating this as 2vs4?
There's three possible worlds.
World number one: mold is a scum ability. That means it is a 2v4. So the correct option is to treat it as such.
World number two: mold is a 3p ability, but the 3p is non-malevolent. In that situation, the 3p is not a threat to the town and I can't think of a single player here who, if they were 3p (barring tictac but tictac is just scum), hasn't shown genuine scumhunting. You, Norwee, Roden, Ceph, all have shown what, if you were 3p, would be real scumhunting. So the 3p in this scenario still helps the town in eliminating the scum, tictac.
World number three: mold is a 3p ability, and is malevolent. In this situation, we still aim for eliminating scum, and leave eliminating the mold to the last remaining scum. We, admittedly, cannot prevent the malevolent mold from winning on its own by votes, but presumably, the scum would not be able to win with the mold either and thus would need to eliminate the mold in order to win.
In all three worlds, we aim to eliminate two scum. And I still believe we are in the first world.
Oh, that.In post 6408, The Three Bears wrote:I detailed about fake voting to force the scummy people to vote first.
Well, it seems tictac is refusing to play along, given...This is a scumclaim from tictac.
It's refusing to take a stance.
It's refusing to do what you asked.
And more than that? Given the mold claims, it's also a scumclaim since a no-yeet would allow for another player to get molded, not to mention, another player to be nightkilled.
There is absolutely 0 reasons for a town player to vote no-yeet so this is just tictac trying to cut losses.
What do you think the mold actually does? If you're aware of the lore around it, do you see it matching up?
Tictac wasn't yeeted D2 because we eliminated a different scumbag that day.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D3 because Tet erroneously believed that there was a guilty on TWIE.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D4 because we yeeted a different scumbag that day.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D5 because y'all decided to gamethrow by yeeting Galron. THIS was the day that Tictac SHOULD have been yeeted.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D6 because Toogeloo decided that fakeclaiming as town was somehow a good idea. If not D5, THIS was the day we should've yeeted Tictac, and we probably WOULD have, if not for the fakeclaim.
Tictac wasn't yeeted D7 because we erroneously believed that yesterday was Mylo. HAD WE KNOWN that it wasn't Mylo on D7, we SHOULD have yeeted Tictac. But since we didn't, we operated under false ideas.
Gotta go.
Tictac is alive because realistically, we only had a couple days where we could've eliminated Tictac.
As for the power balance: balance wise, I legit don't see how 4 scum is balanced, REGARDLESS of the mold being scum or 3p. We SHOULD have a 5th scum, except…well, we don't.
So whatever the mold does, it NEEDS to make up for the lack of an extra scum.
I believe that if the mold was a benevolent 3p, they'd have claimed by now, since there's genuinely no reason not to.
That there isn't a mold source claim, combined by the game being severely underpowered by only 4 scum, means malevolence, beit malevolent 3p or scum.
Which makes sense, since lorewise, mold is very much not benevolent and is a secondary antagonist in the game.
(Can explain better when home.)- tictac
-
tictac Mafia Scum
- tictac
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2737
- Joined: May 24, 2015
u can't just agree w everything i say and then say i'm egragiously wrongIn post 6442, mastina wrote:This is egregiously wrong in a way to, using your own words, is a stance too naive to be believable.
In a vacuum, yes, lylo is better than Mylo.
We are not in a vacuum.
In this game, we both have a very obvious nighykill in the form of Three Bears (they are a universal townread with BOATLOADS of reasons to be town), but ALSO the looming threat of the mold.
so far i have observer zero mech effect from mold. maybe u have some specific fear youd like to adress rather than general fearmongering?You are blatantly and egregiously ignoring the very real threat that the mold possesses.
ah yes. noraa going "i dunno" is supes helpful cotribution.And a nolim just means that someone who we COULD have had contributing, would instead be dead.
adding one more headless chicken to the flock doesn't make them better a better football-team.
That, and even your stated reason for scumreading me is bullshit.
If every claim of being molded were a townstamp as you're saying that I am saying, then it'd mean that the scumteam would be precisely you+Norwee. Is that a scumteam which I have proposed?
…No?
…Yeah, thought not.In post 5977, mastina wrote:Bears is molded when mold is a scum ability; Bears cannot be scum.
seem to remember u saying this of roden as well. ii'll look 4 it if it's relevant.In post 5977, mastina wrote:I am town; I have been molded; I am not scum.
u neglectected to point out anything that was wrong w the post.
So, OBVIOUSLY, mold is not a guaranteed town stamp. One of Ceph/Roden MUST be scum. In other words, this post is bullshit in every way.
(is this helpful for folks? debate like this is better placed in LYLO-situation where we would both have votes down and people could usefully play referee. feels like skipping a step)- tictac
-
tictac Mafia Scum
- tictac
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2737
- Joined: May 24, 2015
- NorwegianboyEE
-
NorwegianboyEE Survivor
- NorwegianboyEE
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 24002
- Joined: August 25, 2019
- Location: Norway
- NorwegianboyEE
-
NorwegianboyEE Survivor
- NorwegianboyEE
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 24002
- Joined: August 25, 2019
- Location: Norway
- Roden
-
Roden He/HimMafia Scum
- Roden
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: May 24, 2021
- Pronoun: He/Him
- tictac
-
tictac Mafia Scum
- tictac
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2737
- Joined: May 24, 2015
see, that is either a lose-condition, or voting outside of (u,norw) will have been a mistake.In post 6448, Roden wrote:Gonna be voting Tictac tomorrow. I'd like if they voted somebody first though, instead of sticking to No Elim.
aka u leaving no valid incentive to comply - tictac
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Roden
- NorwegianboyEE
- NorwegianboyEE
- tictac
- tictac
- mastina
- mastina
- NorwegianboyEE
- tictac
- mastina
- mastina
- NorwegianboyEE
- The Three Bears
- The Three Bears
- Cephrir
- Cephrir
- NorwegianboyEE
- NorwegianboyEE
- NorwegianboyEE
- Cephrir
- Cephrir
- mastina
- NorwegianboyEE
- NorwegianboyEE