How is general wu the most controversial today? Nero talked about him fluff posting a lot, which is pretty whatever.In post 738, fua wrote:I think him not mentioning where he stands on GeneralWu is a little weird considering he's been one of the most controversial out so far today
Yeah yeah.In post 749, VP Baltar wrote:Well, those aren't the same thing for one....In post 736, Nordom wrote:Pressure, throwing shade, what does it matter?
Do you have a previous case of Datisi pressuring you off the bat? Is it scum!indicative for him to be interacting with people other than you?In post 751, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Which makes me suspicious because if Datisi remembers me as the one who "ripped through town" in that one game, then he must have due cause to pressure me.
He lowered his opinion of your scum game based on Nero giving him a counter example.In post 751, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Also, when prompted by Nero, he gave up assessing my meta at the mere sight of the word "daddy".
Haha OK. Make sure you announce it so it looks naturalIn post 754, Nordom wrote:If Datisi's replies in a satisfactory manner, I'm switching my vote to VP.
maybe he's trying to play lowkey, maybe he's too preoccupied under heavy pressure, maybe he doesn't want to accidentally create a good townblock that can put this directionless game in a more focused one. there could be countless of answers, some might not be too obvious to us at the minute. But why town datisi wont is a bigger concern for me.In post 753, Aristeia wrote:Why does Scum Tisi decide to not create a townblock?
How are you making this assessment?In post 751, humaneatingmonkey wrote:His participation does not influence this game, which is pinging my bottom.
why are you trying to pick a fight?In post 755, Aristeia wrote:also why do you think it's impossible for you to form reads this early but also claim datisi should be able to form a townblock this early?
are your abilities so much lower than his?
In post 758, VP Baltar wrote:Haha OK. Make sure you announce it so it looks naturalIn post 754, Nordom wrote:If Datisi's replies in a satisfactory manner, I'm switching my vote to VP.
I think you're mafia and I think datisi is town and I find your reasoning in your post to be absolutely ridiculous on its face.In post 761, humaneatingmonkey wrote:why are you trying to pick a fight?In post 755, Aristeia wrote:also why do you think it's impossible for you to form reads this early but also claim datisi should be able to form a townblock this early?
are your abilities so much lower than his?
also yes, datisi is terribly more experienced than me.
No, but if he does claim that I'm good scum, I expect him to be more suspicious. I only had two completed games with Datisi iirc.In post 756, Aristeia wrote:Do you have a previous case of Datisi pressuring you off the bat? Is it scum!indicative for him to be interacting with people other than you?
What do you mean by "townblock"? Can you quote the reply where he implied that?In post 765, Aristeia wrote:I think you're mafia and I think datisi is town and I find your reasoning in your post to be absolutely ridiculous on its face.In post 761, humaneatingmonkey wrote:why are you trying to pick a fight?In post 755, Aristeia wrote:also why do you think it's impossible for you to form reads this early but also claim datisi should be able to form a townblock this early?
are your abilities so much lower than his?
also yes, datisi is terribly more experienced than me.
You assume that Datisi is able to create a townblock in the first 24 hours of a large theme... which makes very little sense to me - you also previous stated you think nothing ai has actually happened and you think people shouldn't be able to form reads - this is a contradiction just on the surface.
You are imposing a standard that by your own admission is absurd upon Datisi and using it to push him.
i'm confused because you're not trying to play a game with me. you're actively becoming more hostile with mentions of me being less skilled or Datisi's opinion of me being lowered.In post 766, Aristeia wrote:like why are you even pretending to be confused by my actions?
in context he claimed you were good scum in order to defend you from people pushing you for giving a "lol" defense.In post 767, humaneatingmonkey wrote:No, but if he does claim that I'm good scum, I expect him to be more suspicious. I only had two completed games with Datisi iirc.In post 756, Aristeia wrote:Do you have a previous case of Datisi pressuring you off the bat? Is it scum!indicative for him to be interacting with people other than you?
do you know that i won this game?In post 757, Aristeia wrote:He lowered his opinion of your scum game based on Nero giving him a counter example.
You said on the last page I am trying to kill you because I am mafia.In post 769, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i'm confused because you're not trying to play a game with me. you're actively becoming more hostile with mentions of me being less skilled or Datisi's opinion of me being lowered.In post 766, Aristeia wrote:like why are you even pretending to be confused by my actions?
I care more about process, scumrange and how people play in different alignments/scenarios. Whether you win or lose a scum game is irrelevant to me.In post 771, humaneatingmonkey wrote:do you know that i won this game?In post 757, Aristeia wrote:He lowered his opinion of your scum game based on Nero giving him a counter example.
I assume Datisi is able to create a townblock because that's how i remember his playstyle in early games.In post 765, Aristeia wrote:You assume that Datisi is able to create a townblock in the first 24 hours of a large theme... which makes very little sense to me - you also previous stated you think nothing ai has actually happened and you think people shouldn't be able to form reads - this is a contradiction just on the surface.
You are imposing a standard that by your own admission is absurd upon Datisi and using it to push him.