In post 58, tenebrousluminary wrote:VOTE: Datisi
Post 39 feels unnatural to me.
Frogsterking, you may need to do some research on what to expect from this game.
In post 97, tenebrousluminary wrote: In post 93, Datisi wrote:tenebro on the other hand walked in, saw that i'm getting pressure, dropped a vote on me based on weak reasoning, and left.
Did you feel pressured by one vote?
Are you expecting strong reasoning so early in the game?
In post 202, tenebrousluminary wrote: In post 180, Datisi wrote: In post 170, Yeet wrote:Datisi do you think I am meme-pushing you? Is that why you feel rather unaffected by my push on you? I can assure you that I am not memeing with this push on you.
anyone who thinks they can lockscum me on page 2 is lying either to themselves or to everyone else
you may not be meming but the push itself is a meme
I see a contradiction here. If you really were so unconcerned about this push, you would not need to dismiss it this way.
In post 246, tenebrousluminary wrote:
Why shouldn't it? Everyone wants to talk about me! I'm drinking in the attention! Plus, I can't get any information from how players approach me if there is universal agreement about me. That's boring.
In post 260, tenebrousluminary wrote:I am not sure how you got that idea from what I wrote, but okay.
It would be difficult for me to think any case against me had merit when I know it to be wrong.
In post 263, tenebrousluminary wrote:I am not trying to be dismissive of anyone. But I do think it goes without saying that I do not agree with votes against me.
My hope was to be a good listener. It sounds like I'm not doing well.
In post 268, tenebrousluminary wrote:It seems like you are simultaneously demanding that I be defensive and demanding that I go on an offensive in order to satisfy you.
Convincing you is not at the top of my priority list right now anyway, thank you. I am planning to engage with more people and trying to hunt, but you are the one who said I was being dismissive. Suspecting me for responding to it seems at odds with your point that I am suspicious for not responding to the suspicions of others.
In post 269, tenebrousluminary wrote: In post 267, fua wrote:Like. If you take issue with votes on you, then start a dialogue, like you literally stated yourself.
Thank you, but I plan to play the game my way. I'm sorry if that does not line up with your ideas about townie behavior.
In post 318, tenebrousluminary wrote:VOTE: fua
This person chose to pick a fight with me because they perceived me as a weak player they could win an argument against, but their attack did not make sense. Furthermore, in the bottom of 266, they treat me like they know I am town.
In post 304, Datisi wrote:some people not mentioned in your list haven't even posted?? excuse me for asking i guess
class starting back again, cheers
I don't like the way Datisi focused on nitpicking rather than the substance of Nero Cain's argument.
@tenebros, re your previous post to me
I'm not "crushing off" your post, I just didn't think it provided particularly strong reasoning for your play so far from a town POV.
In pretty much every post here you're basically either incredibly defensive, something you thought may have been a mafia tell for Datisi, you joke about being suspected, or you don't actually acknowledge any reasoning against you and try to twist it against the person accusing you to take the heat off without having to make any substantive points.
Like there's basically nothing in here which gives anyone a better idea as to your alignment either way despite there being plenty of posts, it's mostly deflection designed at directing suspicion onto someone else after you got some heat for a fairly weak first vote.