In post 3899, VP Baltar wrote:If that was the team, this game would be so easy it'd be a joke.In post 3897, MathBlade wrote:I think that team would be excellent because only VP is under suspicion.
I think maybe I win as scum a lot because I play scum differently?
Don't worry, fam. I got you if you're town. I'm leaning into my lim for a reason. I'll flip green to set this game rightIn post 3896, April Ludgate wrote:Also, yeah, Fire/DV has scum in them, VPB. Don't know which, but you're stuck in the center of it.
I don’t think this is a good idea if you’re town.In post 3901, VP Baltar wrote:Don't worry, fam. I got you if you're town. I'm leaning into my lim for a reason. I'll flip green to set this game rightIn post 3896, April Ludgate wrote:Also, yeah, Fire/DV has scum in them, VPB. Don't know which, but you're stuck in the center of it.
In post 3764, April Ludgate wrote:Also, I want people to look into this way of phrasing.
He said there's no "actual" evidence, implying that there would indeed be some type of evidence that could be found.
If he was town, "actual" evidence wouldn't be something he needs to bring up, because it would simply be "there's no evidence".
This is a "they're right but for the wrong reasons/no reason" scum defense by Malcolm.
In post 3766, April Ludgate wrote:In post 3759, MalcolmTucker wrote:genuinely astonishingly lazy
also this.
I think it's fairly obvious I've put a lot of effort into trying to get a wagon going on him. The fact he calls it lazy is laughable. He is simply attempting to discredit as much as he can because the reasoning I gave for why he is scum is true, but he thinks it's a bad reasoning that he shouldn't be caught for.
In post 3773, April Ludgate wrote:In post 3768, MalcolmTucker wrote:What is your actual case against me? You admitted early on you "shoot your shot" early because you had no actual case. Now you're just manufacturing it.In post 3764, April Ludgate wrote:Also, I want people to look into this way of phrasing.
He said there's no "actual" evidence, implying that there would indeed be some type of evidence that could be found.
If he was town, "actual" evidence wouldn't be something he needs to bring up, because it would simply be "there's no evidence".
This is a "they're right but for the wrong reasons/no reason" scum defense by Malcolm.
it was a combination of the way you acted towards Tene during that bout, the gamestate momentum, and the political placing you were in during the time.
That was a theory, of course, at that time, and I have been trying to dive deeper into it since, and I finally got a little bit of momentum.
You have actively tried to discredit and push faults rather than look for scum, you shade pushes against you like they're nothing, when even if you were town, they aren't nothing, they're completely valid thoughts.
You have been focused on "no case, no evidence" which is just an overall straight discredit attempt that hopes to brush the problem away rather than confront it until necessary.
Cases are for scum, are for late game big solves. Any case that could me made right now is a simple "hmm, dont know if im feeling that" doesn't mean it's not true.
People can not like the case based on their own individual reads, but it's 100% a case.
Tbh I would I just lack spoons.In post 3904, April Ludgate wrote:People can say they don't like the case, but why say No instead of Maybe. I see no real reason to actively shut it away especially since i havent seen anyone try to town case Malcolm really.
End of the day, cases are weaksauce until Day 4+
You play how you play, I play how I play. Scum want to come at me, I will make them do it head on and regret it long term.In post 3902, MathBlade wrote:I don’t think this is a good idea if you’re town.In post 3901, VP Baltar wrote:Don't worry, fam. I got you if you're town. I'm leaning into my lim for a reason. I'll flip green to set this game rightIn post 3896, April Ludgate wrote:Also, yeah, Fire/DV has scum in them, VPB. Don't know which, but you're stuck in the center of it.
People do this and it works at best 25-50% of the time
How do you know what game VP is talking about?In post 3911, Yeet wrote:You were likely to die last game too…
In post 3910, MathBlade wrote:Problem is I likely die tonight so it’s nothing like last game.
That’s not an assumptionIn post 3916, Yeet wrote:Idk I just assumed
im not. i don't think his attacks (or his willingness to die) are genuine. but if it's not gonna happen id switch back to malcIn post 3912, April Ludgate wrote:Are we over this VPB wagon yet?
The DV-Fire line is sketching it up, and I really don't think it's an optimal fade.
Nah.In post 3912, April Ludgate wrote:Are we over this VPB wagon yet?
I don’t really agree. Not many players have posted since the wagon took off, it hasn’t been very long, and not many active players have /not/ voted Malcolm.In post 3920, April Ludgate wrote:I think people just don't want me to be right, but frankly, I only think I know 1 scum for sure.
This is hella hard to get this wagon going on a slot I feel nobody's really defending.
Who is boon?In post 3868, Nero Cain wrote:Boon is prob town and scum are sheeping him on Malcolm.