Why Fua on VCs?In post 4025, Titus wrote:That moment when I FoS myself lol
And I agree you’re sus based on VCs.
Why Fua on VCs?In post 4025, Titus wrote:That moment when I FoS myself lol
If by good you mean absolutely atrocious then yes I am the best.In post 4040, Frogsterking wrote:I'm worried shinier topics are going to distract from the VP wagon.In post 4032, Nero Cain wrote:scum do post during RVS so it's possible to find scum during "RVS"
can we kill VP now?
This post is fair because I wasn't asking any questions in 4029 so Titus is like mirroring me which makes me think town a little bit (or a deliberate pocketing attempt.)In post 4030, Titus wrote:Ooh fresh meat.In post 4027, Frogsterking wrote:Yeah it's potentially a LAMIST statement to make with a built in excuse to not share thoughts.
I think luminary suggested the first 60 pages and then skipping to when April becomes active which I'd like because Titus' slot is one I really need to sort.
An alternative approach, not really reading at all and providing fresh reads as they come, could be helpful for scum hunting but would be more difficult for us to read Titus' slot itself.
I'm not an easy player to read. I just think differently. I feel I'm pretty transparent but I'm the only one who feels this way.
I try to read people by what they do as opposed to what they say. I care more about why than the what. So early pregame RVS generally makes my eyes bleed. Occasionally I do try, but that try is legit NAI.
Okay so you think Datisi and fua seem scummy because they were viable mislim targets who weren't being pushed very much?In post 4031, Titus wrote:They're major wagons at various gamestates. Knowing the options scum have suggests where they might want to be on the wagon.In post 4028, Frogsterking wrote:Can you explain why your analysis is implicating Datisi and fua?In post 4024, Titus wrote:Using a quick view of the VCs, I would look at Datisi and fua closer. Not superb reasoning but developing reads on those two would give reads on the whole.
My current theory is that scum were sheeping people to punish controversy and just placing easy votes. While it's possible, it's rare for scum to be aggressive when they don't need to be.
Math's prior poster likely provoked a scum vote or two not because of his opinions but what he was saying. Such callousness would make me want to vote him out if he wasn't a mason.
Also does your method of VCA become more helpful the more slots are flipped?
Absolutely yes. I'm using it now to just get feet wet. The more we know about options, the more we can tell about an agenda.
For instance, assuming Math is a mason, then why would scum shoot monkey over Math? What does that say? Votes can and do tell a similar story.
As for HEM and Math I was looking at that earlier and the only difference that really stood out to me was that HEM was pretty vocal about sortng Yeet and even joined my vanity wagon for a little while and Math wasn't vocal about investigating Yeet.
@MathAre you good at reading your sister?
In reply to all this ridiculousness:In post 3964, fireisredsir wrote:ignoring the part that you were objectively wrong about in order to pretend that you were right, nice, very cool.In post 3962, VP Baltar wrote:My point is that DV is saying it is a fact at least one of you is town. That's not true from April's perspective, so either DV is trying to bullshit, or is implying they have inside knowledge. Like I said, reading comprehension.
if deas is town, it's a fact that he is town. here, I'll say it too: "it's a fact that at least one of me/VP is town". he did say April had to face that fact, so i won't die on that hill since i think it's ambiguous enough that your interpretation has some merit. but saying that he was saying one is definitely scum is just completely wrong
you also don't actually think I'm scum so this is bsIn post 3962, VP Baltar wrote:so either DV is trying to bullshit, or is implying they have inside knowledge
Why do you think VPB is town?In post 4048, April Ludgate wrote:I'm really just feelin good vibes from yeet, eyes, and hell even Nero. I also think VPB and Tene are both town.
@Titus - I think DeasV and Fire likely have 1 scum in them, curious on your thoughts on those slots.
Nah, I'm not trying to convince you right now. You made it clear long ago that you've hitched your wagon to fire. That's fine, not my problem. I'm not going to try to convince you you're wrong when everything I say, both of you come in to defend the other.In post 4054, DeasVail wrote:If VP is town, I believe he would expect that ultimately I would come to see this. But the dismissal of me and lack of attempt to show me the light does not match with this. I think VP is playing more like scum, who has written me off as someone who will continue scumreading him, and is focusing on maintaining his existing allies for survival.
I mean... you are Datisi.In post 4024, Titus wrote:I would look at Datisi and fua closer
So lazy,In post 4060, Cape90 wrote:VOTE: Scorpius
Meh, slot has not been towny still and people got off this, meanwhile when VP towned up more people went on them.
I have no reads yet. I was hoping your answer would narrow things down.In post 4037, Nero Cain wrote:In post 4031, Titus wrote:assuming Math is a mason
its Math...In post 4031, Titus wrote:then why would scum shoot monkey over Math?
So you read him? If so why did you not talk about him. If your post wasn't about VP then I have no clue what you are on about.In post 4034, Titus wrote:I didn't get a staunch read either way yet. Why?
No direct opinion aside from mech. I know Datisi's town and Enchant is very unlikely group scum and probably town. Could they have been acting scummy? Sure. However, given we had at least three non group scum wagoned most likely, scum are either the aggressors or merely sheeping the wagons that are on town and isolating those who are correct.In post 4040, Frogsterking wrote:Okay so you think Datisi and fua seem scummy because they were viable mislim targets who weren't being pushed very much?
In post 4064, Scorpious wrote:VOTE: Nero
Basics. Scum flooding the game to hide and make it impossible to case.
Ok.In post 4065, Scorpious wrote:I’m just looking at wagons and votes.
Based on the VP wagon I can see a possible scum Deas as well..
no u don't. lim all liars!In post 4058, VP Baltar wrote:Luv u bbIn post 4056, Nero Cain wrote:What id, we voted out VP as a birthday present?
clearly! I wouldn't call my a spam/shitposter...maybe a hyperposter but even then I don't feel like that's very apt just b/c hyper has a bit of a slight negative connotation to me. Engaged is more like it. I'm always pretty active as town and I don't see why you think my game play is any different than all those other games I have a high post count in.In post 4064, Scorpious wrote:VOTE: Nero
Basics. Scum flooding the game to hide and make it impossible to case.
He has not been adorable this game and I've provided several reasons I think he is town based on game actions. I do not blame you as much as you probably have not read my posts to that effect, but it really feels like we have scum on the ropes right now so I'm pretty sus of the motives of these sudden votes on not just a lurker, when we have some actually legit leads to pursue, but the towniest lurker.In post 4072, Titus wrote:I do. Scorpious struggles with content as scum and gets protected because he's adorable. He still wound up dying eventually but we won that game.