In post 5297, MathBlade wrote:I didIn post 5295, Titus wrote:Can you slow down and combine into one post? It's hard to follow your train of thought.In post 5294, MathBlade wrote:That’s what I am doingIn post 5291, Titus wrote:Right. I agree with most of his wall but minus a few conclusions. I feel he's taking chances and risks to save town. I haven't read D1 but leaders on D1 are usually town unless scum really need a shakeup. Given later days, that's not likely. I've engaged with fire to where I partially see his points but I feel fire assumes scum play like he would when there's multiple ways to go about things.In post 5287, MathBlade wrote:Why does it feel wrong? Iirc you’re the one that said there’s more than feelings?
I'd like you to engage me like Fire has.
You said don’t use 3/4ths of the reasons to scum or TR someone and said to answer your question
So I am
You said to engage you like fire is
So I am one reason at a time
Like wtf?
His Malcolm progression is horrible and is just saving his own butt
He said he won’t use the hood until it is de scummed
This is bad hood play which you Titus would disagree with because when town you love them
But yet he doesn’t ever want to elim in the hood
The cog dissonance is real
Then there’s the never states my points right either
Slow down. Proper sentences with citations. I'm trying to listen to you. Please make it easier. I want this argument to be here for everyone. If I lose, I lose. I just want everyone to understand. Your disjointed frequently rushed posts are difficult to follow, thus I miss points and misunderstand you. You're playing with passion but it's overwhelming you.