1/4 = 225%
3/9 =33% (removed myself and Mathblade)
Yes. That is factually correct.
15. Four in hood. 11 out. The odds were the chances of hitting scum at random excluding Mathblade.In post 5851, Enchant wrote:Do we have just 11 people alive?
So then why are you continually trying to not elim in the hood?In post 5854, Titus wrote:15. Four in hood. 11 out. The odds were the chances of hitting scum at random excluding Mathblade.In post 5851, Enchant wrote:Do we have just 11 people alive?
To be fair, if you exclude Galron, the random odds of hitting scum in and out of the hood become exactly even.
Correct, but shouldn't the odds be to the highest odds, even if we assume the scum in the hood.In post 5853, MathBlade wrote:Yes. That is factually correct.
However the entire game barring you thinks there is scum in the hood
AND
The odds of two places scum can never see of secret chat is absymally low
Even if assume kill masons N1 and N2
You’d have secret communication until Day 6 at best.
That’s just not feasible to pass review
I don't have a strong scumread in the hood at all. I'd rather push higher odds of a flip with higher strength of scum.In post 5855, MathBlade wrote:So then why are you continually trying to not elim in the hood?In post 5854, Titus wrote:15. Four in hood. 11 out. The odds were the chances of hitting scum at random excluding Mathblade.In post 5851, Enchant wrote:Do we have just 11 people alive?
To be fair, if you exclude Galron, the random odds of hitting scum in and out of the hood become exactly even.
If you think VP and Galron are town push Nero or Cape
I am doing what is the highest odds AND where every player in the game but you agreesIn post 5857, Titus wrote:Correct, but shouldn't the odds be to the highest odds, even if we assume the scum in the hood.In post 5853, MathBlade wrote:Yes. That is factually correct.
However the entire game barring you thinks there is scum in the hood
AND
The odds of two places scum can never see of secret chat is absymally low
Even if assume kill masons N1 and N2
You’d have secret communication until Day 6 at best.
That’s just not feasible to pass review
Like if you insist, I'll vote VP solely because he and you cannot be in elo together.
My argument is that you haven't been weighing the options, you just have had 1 static suspicion on VP and the only reason you see me as town is because I'm not VP. You literally don't have a good reason to TR meIn post 5795, Nero Cain wrote:If your argument is that you are town that means that I am correctly reading you and VP so...are you actully arguing that I'm wrong and that you are scum?In post 5788, Cape90 wrote:I think you have the higher chance of flipping mafia just on the virtue of you kinda just seeming to underplay things
I went over that cognitive disonnance. I'm not torpedoing it. I'm accepting that VP will likely be the lim. I'm just wanting to discuss everything, including the possibility of me being wrong or y'all being wrong. I'm willing to discuss any situation that's reasonably possible.In post 5860, MathBlade wrote:I am doing what is the highest odds AND where every player in the game but you agreesIn post 5857, Titus wrote:Correct, but shouldn't the odds be to the highest odds, even if we assume the scum in the hood.In post 5853, MathBlade wrote:Yes. That is factually correct.
However the entire game barring you thinks there is scum in the hood
AND
The odds of two places scum can never see of secret chat is absymally low
Even if assume kill masons N1 and N2
You’d have secret communication until Day 6 at best.
That’s just not feasible to pass review
Like if you insist, I'll vote VP solely because he and you cannot be in elo together.
Why are you torpedoing town agreement?
Yes. It's Nero Galron VP Cape.In post 5864, Enchant wrote:Nero in hood with VP right?
Except you’re not coming at it from a discussion of where you’re wrong.In post 5862, Titus wrote:I went over that cognitive disonnance. I'm not torpedoing it. I'm accepting that VP will likely be the lim. I'm just wanting to discuss everything, including the possibility of me being wrong or y'all being wrong. I'm willing to discuss any situation that's reasonably possible.In post 5860, MathBlade wrote:I am doing what is the highest odds AND where every player in the game but you agreesIn post 5857, Titus wrote:Correct, but shouldn't the odds be to the highest odds, even if we assume the scum in the hood.In post 5853, MathBlade wrote:Yes. That is factually correct.
However the entire game barring you thinks there is scum in the hood
AND
The odds of two places scum can never see of secret chat is absymally low
Even if assume kill masons N1 and N2
You’d have secret communication until Day 6 at best.
That’s just not feasible to pass review
Like if you insist, I'll vote VP solely because he and you cannot be in elo together.
Why are you torpedoing town agreement?
AgreedIn post 5865, fireisredsir wrote:some thoughts
1) i think it's really risky to not flip in the hood today. we might have a better chance at hitting scum if we flip someone like deas, but if he's town, we've gotten nowhere. and if the whole hood is alive at elo there's no shot we win tbh
2) i think if scum april hard pushes malc yday, she has a plan for today. if her plan was to disappear and let someone else lead, then i think she's partnered with someone else who is active and talkative and can lead instead (possibilities include VP, titus, maaaybe nero if VP is town, and if im thinking objectively, prob me)
3) there's no way the scumteam is all people who are lurking today
I think it's real life for April. I don't see April willing ceding her social confession.In post 5865, fireisredsir wrote:some thoughts
1) i think it's really risky to not flip in the hood today. we might have a better chance at hitting scum if we flip someone like deas, but if he's town, we've gotten nowhere. and if the whole hood is alive at elo there's no shot we win tbh
2) i think if scum april hard pushes malc yday, she has a plan for today. if her plan was to disappear and let someone else lead, then i think she's partnered with someone else who is active and talkative and can lead instead (possibilities include VP, titus, maaaybe nero if VP is town, and if im thinking objectively, prob me)
3) there's no way the scumteam is all people who are lurking today
Tbf, I think people are just saying hood has 1 scum because that is the MOST LIKELY scenario, not because they are certain. As enchant points out, there are certainly exceptions, and we have no clue what is in scum to balance (such as a role that finds daytalk or something. )In post 5860, MathBlade wrote:I am doing what is the highest odds AND where every player in the game but you agrees
Why are you torpedoing town agreement?
I've literally been asking about who could have agency captured me if I am wrong, but we aren't discussing those slots or putting any possibility of eliminating them because they're coasting.In post 5867, MathBlade wrote:Except you’re not coming at it from a discussion of where you’re wrong.In post 5862, Titus wrote:I went over that cognitive disonnance. I'm not torpedoing it. I'm accepting that VP will likely be the lim. I'm just wanting to discuss everything, including the possibility of me being wrong or y'all being wrong. I'm willing to discuss any situation that's reasonably possible.In post 5860, MathBlade wrote:I am doing what is the highest odds AND where every player in the game but you agreesIn post 5857, Titus wrote:Correct, but shouldn't the odds be to the highest odds, even if we assume the scum in the hood.In post 5853, MathBlade wrote:Yes. That is factually correct.
However the entire game barring you thinks there is scum in the hood
AND
The odds of two places scum can never see of secret chat is absymally low
Even if assume kill masons N1 and N2
You’d have secret communication until Day 6 at best.
That’s just not feasible to pass review
Like if you insist, I'll vote VP solely because he and you cannot be in elo together.
Why are you torpedoing town agreement?
It’s been proven you are.
It’s more you asserting things
The more you do this the more I want to discard what you are saying.
What actions are you doing to resolve the cognitive dissonance?
Did people claim in the hood? This seems to imply that. I don't want to know the roles if they did.In post 5870, VP Baltar wrote:Tbf, I think people are just saying hood has 1 scum because that is the MOST LIKELY scenario, not because they are certain. As enchant points out, there are certainly exceptions, and we have no clue what is in scum to balance (such as a role that finds daytalk or something. )In post 5860, MathBlade wrote:I am doing what is the highest odds AND where every player in the game but you agrees
Why are you torpedoing town agreement?
I think Titus is using what feels most solid to her and you are using what feels most solid to you.
The primary drivers of my own scum read on Nero would he based on a number of setup assumptions that may or may not be true.Those assumptions are even mote complicated for people outside the hood.