furtiveglance, aligned with
Night 2 begins. Privately message me if you would like fast night, and night will end early on unanimity.
This post was made in twilight, so I’m really confused..In post 871, ItalianoVD wrote:Sounds like scum giving up. Don’t think a townie would give up like that, especially given the context of his play today.In post 866, furtiveglance wrote:I will say goodbye then before this gets locked. Thanks to numberQ for modding, this is a cool setup. Peace
I agree with this. No more fishing for muses.In post 877, fireisredsir wrote:if they were right on both, then maf only really has hope of winning by finding the muses, so muses should be careful, since we likely won't need their info to win and anything to reveal would only hurt town. that's only in the case where both enchant and scorpious are maf, though, there are other possibilities
Confused about what?In post 879, Scorpious wrote:This post was made in twilight, so I’m really confused..In post 871, ItalianoVD wrote:Sounds like scum giving up. Don’t think a townie would give up like that, especially given the context of his play today.In post 866, furtiveglance wrote:I will say goodbye then before this gets locked. Thanks to numberQ for modding, this is a cool setup. Peace
You jumped on someone for “giving up”.. they were already limmed .In post 885, ItalianoVD wrote:Confused about what?In post 879, Scorpious wrote:This post was made in twilight, so I’m really confused..In post 871, ItalianoVD wrote:Sounds like scum giving up. Don’t think a townie would give up like that, especially given the context of his play today.In post 866, furtiveglance wrote:I will say goodbye then before this gets locked. Thanks to numberQ for modding, this is a cool setup. Peace
In post 882, ItalianoVD wrote:But yeah, I’m pretty sure that was as obvious of a flip and night action anyone has ever seen. It was obvious to me that furtive was scum. Just happy we didn’t kill off another innocent.
In post 877, fireisredsir wrote:well, if butterflies was completely wrong on the rest of their solve, i see no reason for maf to kill them, considering they would do everything they can to push those lims through.
so, i think they were likely right on at least one of enchant and umlaut (now scorpious)
if they were right on both, then maf only really has hope of winning by finding the muses, so muses should be careful, since we likely won't need their info to win and anything to reveal would only hurt town. that's only in the case where both enchant and scorpious are maf, though, there are other possibilities
hi scorpious!
whatIn post 888, Scorpious wrote:By this logic though. This game is completely unbalanced barring a d1 scum flip(which happened). And I don’t see a game being so one sided..
Well, unless I’m reading this entirely wrong, which is always a possibility. You are saying for the muses to “be careful”. With them and scum being the only ones that know who scum is, I feel like they should NOT be careful and discuss freely. Some of us don’t know anything and are reliant on the - would it be “TMI” in this case from the muses..In post 889, fireisredsir wrote:whatIn post 888, Scorpious wrote:By this logic though. This game is completely unbalanced barring a d1 scum flip(which happened). And I don’t see a game being so one sided..
expand on this
Now I’m confused. Jumped on? I was already voting him and that comment just moreso solidified my feelings. Town motivation? Again you’re gonna have elaborate on that because I’m lost.In post 886, Scorpious wrote:You jumped on someone for “giving up”.. they were already limmed .In post 885, ItalianoVD wrote:Confused about what?In post 879, Scorpious wrote:This post was made in twilight, so I’m really confused..In post 871, ItalianoVD wrote:Sounds like scum giving up. Don’t think a townie would give up like that, especially given the context of his play today.In post 866, furtiveglance wrote:I will say goodbye then before this gets locked. Thanks to numberQ for modding, this is a cool setup. Peace
What would be your town motivation for doing that?
It feels like a caught scum greatly enhances the odds for town I’m this setup to ultimately end upIn post 891, fireisredsir wrote:im saying that if we've already solved the game, muses have no reason to out themselves by confirming that, and we can just keep going in the direction we're going and it will get confirmed by the flips
if we are way off, then the muses may need to exert some influence, but still should be careful not to out
maf didn't flip d1, that was d2
in which direction are you saying the setup is one-sided? town-sided or maf-sided?
You said this after the hammer. We’re you not aware they had been hammered.In post 893, ItalianoVD wrote:Now I’m confused. Jumped on? I was already voting him and that comment just moreso solidified my feelings. Town motivation? Again you’re gonna have elaborate on that because I’m lost.In post 886, Scorpious wrote:You jumped on someone for “giving up”.. they were already limmed .In post 885, ItalianoVD wrote:Confused about what?In post 879, Scorpious wrote:This post was made in twilight, so I’m really confused..In post 871, ItalianoVD wrote:Sounds like scum giving up. Don’t think a townie would give up like that, especially given the context of his play today.In post 866, furtiveglance wrote:I will say goodbye then before this gets locked. Thanks to numberQ for modding, this is a cool setup. Peace
What would be your town motivation for doing that?
Not a lie. I said what I said and meant it. Don’t try to think for me. Furtive’s comment felt like it was coming from scum, not from town. Where is the town inspiration in his comment?In post 887, Scorpious wrote:In post 882, ItalianoVD wrote:But yeah, I’m pretty sure that was as obvious of a flip and night action anyone has ever seen. It was obvious to me that furtive was scum. Just happy we didn’t kill off another innocent.
This is a lie based on your post-hammer comment.
You didn’t know… it wasn’t obvious to you..
I defer to my question aboveIn post 896, ItalianoVD wrote:Not a lie. I said what I said and meant it. Don’t try to think for me. Furtive’s comment felt like it was coming from scum, not from town. Where is the town inspiration in his comment?In post 887, Scorpious wrote:In post 882, ItalianoVD wrote:But yeah, I’m pretty sure that was as obvious of a flip and night action anyone has ever seen. It was obvious to me that furtive was scum. Just happy we didn’t kill off another innocent.
This is a lie based on your post-hammer comment.
You didn’t know… it wasn’t obvious to you..
yeah, that's fine, i get it. in this case it really doesn't have much to do with the setup i feel, it's just that butterflies had a clear solve that they were pounding home, most people have those people in their poe at least if not their top suspicions, the first of the 3 in the solve flipped scum, and butterflies died. so it's more due to the current state of the game than the setupIn post 894, Scorpious wrote:It feels like a caught scum greatly enhances the odds for town I’m this setup to ultimately end up
At the scenario you are describing.
Which as I write it and read seems more like a more common idea. Like “of course catching maf increases chances”
Idk, I’m just trying to fall into the game here.
I generally agree with all this.In post 877, fireisredsir wrote:well, if butterflies was completely wrong on the rest of their solve, i see no reason for maf to kill them, considering they would do everything they can to push those lims through.
so, i think they were likely right on at least one of enchant and umlaut (now scorpious)
if they were right on both, then maf only really has hope of winning by finding the muses, so muses should be careful, since we likely won't need their info to win and anything to reveal would only hurt town. that's only in the case where both enchant and scorpious are maf, though, there are other possibilities
hi scorpious!