I'm finding less and less instances of "theatre" lately as whole amongst games. its like people cant be assed anymore to really "perform" as scum..In post 1250, ItalianoVD wrote:Even that exchange between him and HEM about HEM’s scumgame makes me kinda think they’re both town. I mean if they’re both scum doing theater than they got me. Naturally though I just feel that the more probable answer is that they’re both town.
It's not a free pass but I'm not sure Koopa makes it up at that point in the game. They weren't really nearing elimination or anything as such albeit they weren't in the clear; they appeared to detect the discussion between them and Flavor was going nowhere and a reveal was the best way to move past that. Such an approach feels quite townie to me. Do you still think Koopa is mafia in light of their claim?In post 1299, Scorpious wrote:This one of my favorite excerpts from this game so far.In post 1250, ItalianoVD wrote:I also like to point out that a pr claim is not a free pass to get townread. I’m not throwing shade koopa, but I don’t think anybody should townread you based on that claim. They should townread you on your play and how you’ve formulated your reads and such.
town points for this post
WTF?In post 1288, MathBlade wrote:You either fail to understand my point or are intentionally dense.In post 1286, Not Known 15 wrote:The other game is finished. There is no rush.In post 1267, MathBlade wrote:I am not really a reads list guy I am more a potential trans guy. If I stop catching up (as it is I am 5 pages behind and I have to start work now) then I would be doing so inaccurately as well. Therefore I will not do this.In post 1147, Not Known 15 wrote:@everyone
We should stop here for a moment(1 day or so) and everyone posts readslists and then we can discuss more.
What makes you post in this game and not in the prior game you were vigged?
I know that game finished I replaced into it.
During that game you did not post.
This game you are posting.
What is the difference as to why?
Yes. You were.In post 1303, Not Known 15 wrote:WTF?In post 1288, MathBlade wrote:You either fail to understand my point or are intentionally dense.In post 1286, Not Known 15 wrote:The other game is finished. There is no rush.In post 1267, MathBlade wrote:I am not really a reads list guy I am more a potential trans guy. If I stop catching up (as it is I am 5 pages behind and I have to start work now) then I would be doing so inaccurately as well. Therefore I will not do this.In post 1147, Not Known 15 wrote:@everyone
We should stop here for a moment(1 day or so) and everyone posts readslists and then we can discuss more.
What makes you post in this game and not in the prior game you were vigged?
I know that game finished I replaced into it.
During that game you did not post.
This game you are posting.
What is the difference as to why?
VOTE: Mathblade
I wasdeadwhen he replaced in. This is mudslinging.
It would be irresponsible for me to vote there D1,although I do not like the way it was presented. I'm not 100% convinced.In post 1302, MalcolmTucker wrote:It's not a free pass but I'm not sure Koopa makes it up at that point in the game. They weren't really nearing elimination or anything as such albeit they weren't in the clear; they appeared to detect the discussion between them and Flavor was going nowhere and a reveal was the best way to move past that. Such an approach feels quite townie to me. Do you still think Koopa is mafia in light of their claim?In post 1299, Scorpious wrote:This one of my favorite excerpts from this game so far.In post 1250, ItalianoVD wrote:I also like to point out that a pr claim is not a free pass to get townread. I’m not throwing shade koopa, but I don’t think anybody should townread you based on that claim. They should townread you on your play and how you’ve formulated your reads and such.
town points for this post
I respond with votes often when I'm scum...In post 1305, MathBlade wrote:Like you can argue mudslinging if you want it does make you look bad as you do look bad to me but anyone can go back and review the game.
You were a lurker and were shot for it.
Here you’re not.
My question is why and instead of an explanation I get a vote.
I have words but I am at work but I strongly disagree with this assertion.In post 1308, Scorpious wrote:way too early solve:
Mathblade,NK15,Jv...
Thats the pool right now, D1, too early, but thats where I'm at.
Surely it's natural for players to approach different games differently? I maintain a pretty consistent approach but then I'm a very boring player for the most part. I don't think posting more often/less often should automatically be seen as an indicator of a player's alignment unless it's something pretty stark compared to most previous games they've played.In post 1305, MathBlade wrote:Like you can argue mudslinging if you want it does make you look bad as you do look bad to me but anyone can go back and review the game.
You were a lurker and were shot for it.
Here you’re not.
My question is why and instead of an explanation I get a vote.
So now you reckon we are seeing some theatre from the mafia team?In post 1309, Scorpious wrote:I feel like mathblade came into scum chat and said lets ramp this up a bit..
reading over it yes..In post 1312, MalcolmTucker wrote:So now you reckon we are seeing some theatre from the mafia team?In post 1309, Scorpious wrote:I feel like mathblade came into scum chat and said lets ramp this up a bit..
In post 1310, MathBlade wrote:I have words but I am at work but I strongly disagree with this assertion.In post 1308, Scorpious wrote:way too early solve:
Mathblade,NK15,Jv...
Thats the pool right now, D1, too early, but thats where I'm at.
It’s like so I point out something that irks me about NK15
So NK votes me so NK15 plus me decide to fight when I could have just not responded and keep my vote on HEM in that world?
No,I think the reason you aren;t voting NK15 is because your playing carefully and don't want it to look like an OMGUS vote.
Your solve makes no sense
The reason I don’t cross vote NK15 is because I think HEM is more likely scum than NK15 based on thread moves.
I agree with this.In post 1311, MalcolmTucker wrote:Surely it's natural for players to approach different games differently? I maintain a pretty consistent approach but then I'm a very boring player for the most part. I don't think posting more often/less often should automatically be seen as an indicator of a player's alignment unless it's something pretty stark compared to most previous games they've played.In post 1305, MathBlade wrote:Like you can argue mudslinging if you want it does make you look bad as you do look bad to me but anyone can go back and review the game.
You were a lurker and were shot for it.
Here you’re not.
My question is why and instead of an explanation I get a vote.
I can see NK15's vote as definitely being quite suspect potentially. MathBlade feels unlikely to go out at the moment given they've replaced in and there's not a lot of pressure there so far. It's potentially an easy place for under pressure mafia to park a vote, but then I suppose that also depends on whether you think mafia are aiming to drive a town elimination at the moment or just try to avoid suspicion irrespective of who goes. Although I may be letting my own personal biases get in the way here based on who I've suspected so far: I thought your vote on Koopa was really lazy but didn't SR you for it.In post 1313, Scorpious wrote:reading over it yes..In post 1312, MalcolmTucker wrote:So now you reckon we are seeing some theatre from the mafia team?In post 1309, Scorpious wrote:I feel like mathblade came into scum chat and said lets ramp this up a bit..
Let me tell you, I am very good at scum. Very clearly put if I am scum I always vote NK15 and ride the cred and create a big argument and play emotions. Poor reaction votes like that are great for chaos and can provide several examples where I do this.In post 1315, Scorpious wrote:wtf.. sorry
No,I think the reason you aren;t voting NK15 is because your playing carefully and don't want it to look like an OMGUS vote.
The response is in there smh
Fair enough, I don't always like games getting too bogged down in meta and sometimes prefer to just let players play from scratch while basing reads on the individual game itself, but the vote in response was not a particularly good look at all for me.In post 1316, MathBlade wrote:I agree with this.In post 1311, MalcolmTucker wrote:Surely it's natural for players to approach different games differently? I maintain a pretty consistent approach but then I'm a very boring player for the most part. I don't think posting more often/less often should automatically be seen as an indicator of a player's alignment unless it's something pretty stark compared to most previous games they've played.In post 1305, MathBlade wrote:Like you can argue mudslinging if you want it does make you look bad as you do look bad to me but anyone can go back and review the game.
You were a lurker and were shot for it.
Here you’re not.
My question is why and instead of an explanation I get a vote.
That’s why I asked why.
Maybe NK15 saw something that made them more engaged which they would have said “Yo so and so is so obviously scum and that makes me more interested” or a reason.
It’s asking why to see if it’s scum indicative. A turnaround vote is not an appropriate response.
It was a lazy vote,they were just being so irritating..In post 1317, MalcolmTucker wrote:I can see NK15's vote as definitely being quite suspect potentially. MathBlade feels unlikely to go out at the moment given they've replaced in and there's not a lot of pressure there so far. It's potentially an easy place for under pressure mafia to park a vote, but then I suppose that also depends on whether you think mafia are aiming to drive a town elimination at the moment or just try to avoid suspicion irrespective of who goes. Although I may be letting my own personal biases get in the way here based on who I've suspected so far: I thought your vote on Koopa was really lazy but didn't SR you for it.In post 1313, Scorpious wrote:reading over it yes..In post 1312, MalcolmTucker wrote:So now you reckon we are seeing some theatre from the mafia team?In post 1309, Scorpious wrote:I feel like mathblade came into scum chat and said lets ramp this up a bit..
But then if you're very good as scum, and if you have an approach to the game you always follow as scum when it comes to voting, and if you're keen on meta, then a clever player could reverse such an approach every so often to throw a spanner in the works...In post 1319, MathBlade wrote:Let me tell you, I am very good at scum. Very clearly put if I am scum I always vote NK15 and ride the cred and create a big argument and play emotions. Poor reaction votes like that are great for chaos and can provide several examples where I do this.In post 1315, Scorpious wrote:wtf.. sorry
No,I think the reason you aren;t voting NK15 is because your playing carefully and don't want it to look like an OMGUS vote.
The response is in there smh
I agree as scum I am manipulative but here I am being straightforward.
You can go back in my null pile.In post 1320, MalcolmTucker wrote:Fair enough, I don't always like games getting too bogged down in meta and sometimes prefer to just let players play from scratch while basing reads on the individual game itself, but the vote in response was not a particularly good look at all for me.In post 1316, MathBlade wrote:I agree with this.In post 1311, MalcolmTucker wrote:Surely it's natural for players to approach different games differently? I maintain a pretty consistent approach but then I'm a very boring player for the most part. I don't think posting more often/less often should automatically be seen as an indicator of a player's alignment unless it's something pretty stark compared to most previous games they've played.In post 1305, MathBlade wrote:Like you can argue mudslinging if you want it does make you look bad as you do look bad to me but anyone can go back and review the game.
You were a lurker and were shot for it.
Here you’re not.
My question is why and instead of an explanation I get a vote.
That’s why I asked why.
Maybe NK15 saw something that made them more engaged which they would have said “Yo so and so is so obviously scum and that makes me more interested” or a reason.
It’s asking why to see if it’s scum indicative. A turnaround vote is not an appropriate response.
NK15's vote pattern today - opting for HEM after not previously suspecting them, and voting you now, isn't a great look at all. Question is whether it's an approach scum would employ.
Fair. Just pointing out that I've TR'd you for a lazy vote, so I'm aware it could seem contradictory to do so for NK15 when they've made a lazy vote, but the difference is I suppose I SR'd them already.In post 1321, Scorpious wrote:It was a lazy vote,they were just being so irritating..In post 1317, MalcolmTucker wrote:I can see NK15's vote as definitely being quite suspect potentially. MathBlade feels unlikely to go out at the moment given they've replaced in and there's not a lot of pressure there so far. It's potentially an easy place for under pressure mafia to park a vote, but then I suppose that also depends on whether you think mafia are aiming to drive a town elimination at the moment or just try to avoid suspicion irrespective of who goes. Although I may be letting my own personal biases get in the way here based on who I've suspected so far: I thought your vote on Koopa was really lazy but didn't SR you for it.In post 1313, Scorpious wrote:reading over it yes..In post 1312, MalcolmTucker wrote:So now you reckon we are seeing some theatre from the mafia team?In post 1309, Scorpious wrote:I feel like mathblade came into scum chat and said lets ramp this up a bit..