In post 1333, Datisi wrote:attempting to analyze skitter's coalition preferences and pushes, starting from page 24:
page 24 is the first time ari offers to sheep skitter.
591 is skitt having a preference of skitt/dats/irrel/std/mena, idk who to go after if that fails. then we figure out the deadline is not as short, ok cool there's more time.
In post 791, skitter30 wrote:but yeah i guess i'll go through the thought experiment:
ari agreeing to be left out of a coalition of me/irrel/mena/std/dats
means it doesn't make sense for her to be scum with fire/mala/nk15
tbh i don't see anything impossible for ari + any of irrel/mena/std/dats
this is the next relevant post in the skitt/ari discussion - where skitter says it doesn't make sense for ari to be scum with a "lower-rated" player but does with a "higher-rated" player (you know what i mean)
In post 875, skitter30 wrote:Probably still you but apparently i relish paranoia and indecision
I.e. i'm still not confident on a 5th yet, if i had to pick one would probably be you but still not confident enuf to settle on that if that makes sense
I will probably get over this closer to deadline
next relevant post - skitter says she still prefers skitt/dats/irrel/std/mena, with me being lowest confidence
next relevant post...
In post 971, skitter30 wrote: In post 969, skitter30 wrote: In post 887, fireisredsir wrote:i think if ari is scum she's likely scum with someone who is already in, and so there is very little utility to leaving her out
... honestly this is a p good point
Tbh the more I think abt it from this pov i'm not entirelu opposed to putting ari in
(On the condition that if it fails and she doesnt, like, solve the game she gets flipped before elo)
is skitter saying how fire has a point in his analysis and basically saying she could maybe sorta put ari into the coalition.
In post 993, skitter30 wrote:Mala do u have any response to my posts towards u on the prior page?
I'm leaning towards me/mena/irrel/std + one of ari/dats/fire rn
again, this is like, not showing a huge preference on which person gets added as the 5th.
In post 1018, skitter30 wrote:And then i guess i kinda vibe with fire's point that if ari is scum its probably with someone in the consensus coalition anyways, so i'm no longer entirely opposed
I guess i dont object to putting ari in but i'd want her to go in with dats, and i want the condition to be that if its elo and she hasnt found all the scum, she gets flipped
Otherwise i probably want dats in
i cut this post a bit but the important part is that skitter was decently fine with ari being in a coalition, mostly due to fire's arguments
In post 1026, skitter30 wrote: In post 1019, Aristeia wrote:I think if you want to be the leader here you should put the reads you feel confident in.
I have a lot of thoughts about Dats and I'm not sure how helpful it will be for you to read them but I can write them down if you want me to.
I'm not confident I can find scum!him.
I mean i dont think i indicated i wanted to be a leader here at all >.> my reads arent confident enuf , and its not like i'm strongly pushing a given coalition either
And if ur not confident in dats either idk if i want to pit him in, but then it's hard for me to find a confident fifth
this is the next relevant post, where ari is nudging skitter to be a leader, and she openly says that she doesn't want to be the leader, she's not feeling confident enough, she's not strongly pushing, etc
1038 is a hmm post to me because i felt like std was viable at the time and the fact that she was going "is std viable? no? i guess i can remove him..." is Concerning
In post 1068, skitter30 wrote: In post 1056, Aristeia wrote:I think he knows I'm very hard to mis-eliminate so putting me into a coalition really is limiting his own mislim opportunities and making it harder for himself post-coalition failure and I'm not sure why he would want to do that? It really does feel like he wants a coalition that will work.
Ty for writing that all out, i appreciate it
I think the above is a cogent point + there's quite a lot of depth/nuance here that i had to ask for (i.e. it doesnt seem like a read that you made up to share to look Nuanced, its more just something internally that youu were wresting with that you shared when i asked), which makes me think its more likely real
this is a kind of a townread of ari
In post 1094, skitter30 wrote:I still reallh want me/mena/irrel/std but alas we cannot all have the things we want
this is i think the last time skitter commented how much she wants the coalition, but immediately notes it's most likely not happening.
then it's mena appearing, the hammer, coalition failure, etc.
In post 1182, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1035, Aristeia wrote:don't stress skitts pls let's make this a very low key and fun thing : )
I mean this is what i was pushing for a few days, you never seemed interested, and when i directly asked you this is what u answered
I also asked u directly about std a few posts down and you told me you wanted dats over him
this is what she says shortly after d2 starts.
and like, i have problems with her characterizing her posts on a coalition with std as "pushes" because all she did was ask a few times if a core that includes std is ok. like, that's not a push. she wasn't pushing for std to be included, she mentioned a few times that she townreads him (unless i missed it, it wasn't even explained why) and that she doesn't want ari and ari is not her first choice. except she also has so many posts on why she could maybe sorta put ari into the coalition.