i think you're making a very basic mistake hereIn post 2073, fireisredsir wrote:bloodhail, do you think there's any merit to the argument that mena's cases aren't strong enough to justify his level of frustration/confidence?
wondering cause im not like super confident in it but it is kind of a sticking point for me atm
(references: 1794, 1796, and 1797 I talk about this, 1558, 1744, 1746, 1767 are examples of the kind of attitude i was talking about from him)
what you are calling out is that mena's expressed confidence level in his
the thing is, a case is only words someone puts together to try to make a read understandable to other people but the read is something that you develop before you put any words to it. that he is unable to explain it adequately doesn't make him scum. and i don't necessarily feel like the read feels like scum-flail as much as someone wrapped up in an ego clash (biased because i've ego clashed with him multiple times before)
i see what you're saying and, like, it's entirely possible that this is him putting on a show as scum but. that's not how i lean on it. when i've seen him as scum with his back against the wall it was bluster and stalling and not even really being able to manufacture a push on town. this looks more real. could be off base but thats my assessment. if i have time i'll reread him to be sure.