In post 113, Roden wrote:I saw that, I mean what was their actual experience playing the game.
Hmmm not sure exactly what you're asking but I played via email as I've said and that was like more than a decade ago. I guess I have 10-15 games under my belt.
Not quite the answer that I was expecting, but it's interesting to know nonetheless.
In post 16, hutmeil wrote:I guess since this is Day 1, all the current votes are senseless.
My notes:
Alianna
- was informed that furtiveglance is Town?? (Mason or Friendly Neighbor?)
- asks who wants to be nightkilled (sus)
Originally, I thought this was just a joke, but then you made this post:
In post 68, whiskey delta wrote:hutmeil seems Elim Bait ish to me but I am bothered by how they assumed Alianna meant a Town role in her post 11. Can you talk about that
@hutmeil
?
Dislike Roden hedging on that wagon more though
VOTE: Roden
Well, according to Alianna, she was "informed" that furtiveglance is Town. That could mean several things:
- Alianna is a Mason, so it was the mod that "informed" her
- Alianna is FN, which is not likely since we started with Day 1 and not Night 1. She can only be informed after Night 1 (if I'm right).
Based on above, she's likely Mason (assuming she's Town). So that means, we're either setup Col A Row 3 or Col C Row 3.
Right now, I'm not inclined to vote either of them because if both of them are Town, then the other will die on Night 1. So that's 2 Towns in a row. I'd rather vote someone who like to bandwagon like:
UNVOTE: takotsubo syndrome
VOTE: Roden
If Roden, turns out scum, then I'd say takotsubo is scum too since they're the ones who started the bandwagon on me.
On another note, sorry about my late replies. I'm from GMT +8 so most probably not same timezone as you guys.
You double down on discussing PRs even though you've been told it's an anti-town thing to do. I could understand making this kind of mistake if you were just new, but you're claiming to have a pretty decent amount of experience under your belt. For comparison, it only takes five games to be considered SE (Semi-Experienced) on this site.
So considering your experience with the game, and your general tone that gives me the feeling that you know what you're doing, it makes me think that you openly discussing PRs is just feigned ignorance.
What this does not account for is the fact that the meta around discussing roles may have been different over a decade ago in email games.
Sure.
I really wouldn't want to eliminate anyone at that point in the game because if I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and if I'm right, we don't have much for associatives.
But if I had to, probably Tidus. He's lurked a lot, and 110 was very low-effort and basically a restatement of what was already discussed.
@Alianna sure. I do. But before I do, who would you eliminate right now if you theoretically had the hammer right now as at post 117?
72, please share those thoughts now.
I hope my answer is relevant to whatever you're going to say. We can't really afford to wait to share thoughts in this gamestate.
So here’s the deal with hutmeil I’m willing to give that slot the benefit of the doubt that this is just newer town posting, but it just seems like he acts like he doesn’t know how a role works and then goes yes I did. He wants to continue the anti town conversation even tho it’s been stated multiple times why it is and to stop it. I feel like if he is in fact scum then whoever the partner is prob not an active player currently.
This could just make him town, but he’s mostly someone I don’t want to stay til endgame because I think he could be more harmful
In post 78, furtiveglance wrote:I have early townleans on whiskey delta and hutmeil. I don't think anyone else has earned one yet.
Why
whiskey delta
?
I agreed about hutmeil. That's it pretty much
You mean you agree with
whiskey delta
's evaluation of
hutmeil
and that makes
whiskey delta
town? Why is that alignment indicative at all?
Yes, I don't really think that right=town is much of a fallacy. If I agree with what someone's saying about another player, I'll generally townread them for it.
In post 134, Alianna wrote:Sure.
I really wouldn't want to eliminate anyone at that point in the game because if I'm wrong, I'm wrong, and if I'm right, we don't have much for associatives.
But if I had to, probably Tidus. He's lurked a lot, and 110 was very low-effort and basically a restatement of what was already discussed.
