In post 656, Save The Dragons wrote:Control was a game I had an argument with you and misread you
This is a game where I feel like I'm misreading you
So the way I played in Control was pinging you similarly to how I'm playing now. But now you think you're just misreading me. Do I have that right?
What exactly did I do that pinged you this game? Because I had no idea that you scum read me until after you tried to disengage.
I didn't want to broadcast it because I wanted to be more confident I was actually reading you correctly and not just picking up on the nuanced things you do thst make me think you were scum in control and what I was able to use to help try and bury you in the coalition game that just ended.
I think attacking me for BS/bad whatever reads looks like posting just to post but maybe you just do that I dunno how to read you
Why? Like I said, I understand if all town or 3 town one scum were agreeing on a read that you have a point. But you claimed 2 or even all 3 scum agreeing on a read still makes it a good non-BS read. Like, how does that work out?
Why is this so important to you it's so insignificant to me
It's kinda important to know if you actually mean what you say and if you actually believe in it. Because you're implying that you're potentially pocketed by one, two, or all of NM Dwlee and HEM, and that even if you were that your Nancy read is still a good read.
Like, do you understand how that wouldn't really make any sense to me?
Why? Like I said, I understand if all town or 3 town one scum were agreeing on a read that you have a point. But you claimed 2 or even all 3 scum agreeing on a read still makes it a good non-BS read. Like, how does that work out?
Why is this so important to you it's so insignificant to me
It's kinda important to know if you actually mean what you say and if you actually believe in it. Because you're implying that you're potentially pocketed by one, two, or all of NM Dwlee and HEM, and that even if you were that your Nancy read is still a good read.
Like, do you understand how that wouldn't really make any sense to me?
Then 1 town still believes in the read so it's not purely a scum read
I understand exactly why it wouldn't make sense to you
I just don't understand why it matters whether I believe it's a bs read or not because it has nothing to do with my alignment I'm just going to tell you how I feel regardless of alignment. So what are you getting from this conversation?
In post 519, Save The Dragons wrote:I believe in some meta adjacent things but not meta itself. Like when people say "she's like this as town" maybe I agree.
When people say "In x game I was like this here's a link here's a quote" maybe I don't care
I hate the fact my history of reading you is so damned wrong.
Cause this sinks more than my ass during an IBS flare
In post 656, Save The Dragons wrote:Control was a game I had an argument with you and misread you
This is a game where I feel like I'm misreading you
So the way I played in Control was pinging you similarly to how I'm playing now. But now you think you're just misreading me. Do I have that right?
What exactly did I do that pinged you this game? Because I had no idea that you scum read me until after you tried to disengage.
I didn't want to broadcast it because I wanted to be more confident I was actually reading you correctly and not just picking up on the nuanced things you do thst make me think you were scum in control and what I was able to use to help try and bury you in the coalition game that just ended.
I think attacking me for BS/bad whatever reads looks like posting just to post but maybe you just do that I dunno how to read you
I...don't think I attacked you. I didn't even say it was scummy. I just thought your reasoning was flawed. I got annoyed when you just dismissed and disengaged instead of trying to solve. Like you can say you don't want to argue but I feel like you'd still rather fight than just debate a point.
Also...how is that me posting just to post? I was engaging with several players and had just town cased Sinatra before I said anything to you. I was already posting and don't really need an excuse to post more. I don't really get that.
Why? Like I said, I understand if all town or 3 town one scum were agreeing on a read that you have a point. But you claimed 2 or even all 3 scum agreeing on a read still makes it a good non-BS read. Like, how does that work out?
Why is this so important to you it's so insignificant to me
It's kinda important to know if you actually mean what you say and if you actually believe in it. Because you're implying that you're potentially pocketed by one, two, or all of NM Dwlee and HEM, and that even if you were that your Nancy read is still a good read.
Like, do you understand how that wouldn't really make any sense to me?
Then 1 town still believes in the read so it's not purely a scum read
I understand exactly why it wouldn't make sense to you
I...didn't say anything about it purely being a scum read.
If you understand then why is there a disconnect? Why do you think you can't read me?
In post 679, Save The Dragons wrote:I just don't understand why it matters whether I believe it's a bs read or not because it has nothing to do with my alignment I'm just going to tell you how I feel regardless of alignment. So what are you getting from this conversation?
Because that's how I read people. You already know this.
In post 656, Save The Dragons wrote:Control was a game I had an argument with you and misread you
This is a game where I feel like I'm misreading you
So the way I played in Control was pinging you similarly to how I'm playing now. But now you think you're just misreading me. Do I have that right?
What exactly did I do that pinged you this game? Because I had no idea that you scum read me until after you tried to disengage.
I didn't want to broadcast it because I wanted to be more confident I was actually reading you correctly and not just picking up on the nuanced things you do thst make me think you were scum in control and what I was able to use to help try and bury you in the coalition game that just ended.
I think attacking me for BS/bad whatever reads looks like posting just to post but maybe you just do that I dunno how to read you
I...don't think I attacked you. I didn't even say it was scummy. I just thought your reasoning was flawed. I got annoyed when you just dismissed and disengaged instead of trying to solve. Like you can say you don't want to argue but I feel like you'd still rather fight than just debate a point.
Also...how is that me posting just to post? I was engaging with several players and had just town cased Sinatra before I said anything to you. I was already posting and don't really need an excuse to post more. I don't really get that.
In post 605, Save The Dragons wrote:I've made my peace I'm happy to laugh at you all from the dead thread but what are you going to do when it's not me? What are you going to let Nancy and roden get away with?
Why? Like I said, I understand if all town or 3 town one scum were agreeing on a read that you have a point. But you claimed 2 or even all 3 scum agreeing on a read still makes it a good non-BS read. Like, how does that work out?
Why is this so important to you it's so insignificant to me
It's kinda important to know if you actually mean what you say and if you actually believe in it. Because you're implying that you're potentially pocketed by one, two, or all of NM Dwlee and HEM, and that even if you were that your Nancy read is still a good read.
Like, do you understand how that wouldn't really make any sense to me?
Then 1 town still believes in the read so it's not purely a scum read
I understand exactly why it wouldn't make sense to you
I...didn't say anything about it purely being a scum read.
If you understand then why is there a disconnect? Why do you think you can't read me?
In post 679, Save The Dragons wrote:I just don't understand why it matters whether I believe it's a bs read or not because it has nothing to do with my alignment I'm just going to tell you how I feel regardless of alignment. So what are you getting from this conversation?
Because that's how I read people. You already know this.
Great thats what I meant glad to see we jusr aren't on the same page like I said 10 posts ago
Understanding that we are different doesn't mean I know what to do with that knowledge to tr or sr you correctly
I don't because I don't care about meta and don't remember how everyone plays 100% of the time.
I'm tired of these dragons on that motherfucking fence...
This post warrants a scummie nom.
***
We just need to tread carefully because if you slip up around her as scum she notices and will tear your spine out and slap you to death with it. (I'm slightly scared of Nancy)
~the worst
*******
Nancy is pretty heavenly ngl
~CheekyTeeky
*******
Nancy-scum feels like a hot knife slicing through butter. Nancy-town feels like a magnifying glass in the sun glaring down at an insect.
