I simply don't agree, when putting a vote on right after someone else you should always check and make sure you aren't putting them on E-1, while I do also typically put E-2 if my vote is putting someone there, putting someone to E-2 isnt putting someone in range of a quickhammer and thus much worse.In post 290, Bellaphant wrote:No, I think it's a bit shit, but it also could have been a mistake, same as mine was. If I didn't know it was e-2, it's just as reasonable that he missed it too.
I felt like the scum reads on bbt piled on pretty quick and yours seemed to have the least behind in..you may say that's because you had less posts in total, but it also seemed a very weird, very quick pile on.
The same way you and rad seemed to have piled on me. I dislike 'bella thought' and 'bella acted' and then seeing things that are totally unrecognisable to me: I don't think that's unreasonable.
@rad, I believe that. It was also, in context, a comment on you doing a 180 on a read based on massively over thinking it, which I think was also pointed out by whiskey delta. It's not s controversial statement.
Its not just about less posts in total it was my second post on here as I joined late and had to catch up. So scum reading me purely because I put some feelers out there on a scum read to be the basis of your scum read on me is very weak indeed.
Honestly bella I was town reading you initially from when I was skimming through I still need to read through in more detail but I agreed with what I read from Rad and that along with the coincidence of the votes placed on you to the next page with you jumping on me for a reason of I scum read BBT in my second post... its just fishy.