In post 571, Beat wrote:The latter I later decided was AI as I imagined it came up in ISOing me which scum could do but I wouldnt expect it that early.
this feels like kind of a reach, how do you know he ISO'd you instead of just quick replying to a random post he thought he could jump on?
In post 571, Beat wrote:They also have been fairly consistent all around and not manipulative in my opinion.
I disagree with this one, I feel saying Isis was "
so
" over the top was embellishment and his reasoning on Gamma being "put me to sleep" (330) and "posts deserve a vote" (336) is all language meant to manipulate people's posts into sounding 'bad' without detailing why Cakez actually believes they're alignment indicative.
who do you think might be scum in addition to Meuh? I see a lot of townreads coming from you but not a lot of directed pressure at players
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 379, Beat wrote:I dont really see any reason Pav should be scumread at this point and it makes me wary of the motion in that direction. VOTE: Meuh
Like this feels like how scum would defend their partner
-Through scumreading a third party
-While not actively stating they think their partner is town
Especially how much this setup make red flips bad for the scumteam
Agreed, and that's exactly what I noticed. This is a common tactic referred to as a chainsaw.
In post 554, the worst wrote:probably gonna stay on meuh? I liked cakez' skitter read but I can't remember like anything else he's done this game
Are you really scum? Where's the worst I know?
I like these posts and am leaning town on Titus at the moment, she feels pretty natural. Plus I like the theory on Pav/Beat because that's something I also had in mind.
In post 564, GuiltyLion wrote:marci can you use your vote constructively somewhere? the game has too many vanity or no voters right now and I have a feeling your marci wagon is not gonna happen at this point
ill get to it when i get to it smhsmh
In post 574, GuiltyLion wrote:tigers don't wear dresses, silly! and as for the sandwich I ate it
whats this then???
also btw HOW LONG DID U HAVE THAT RED SCARF ON I NEVER NOTICED IT-
I think Marci's alignment is probably going to win the game so I'm hoping I'm part of it!! & I also have 0 other non-tonal reads on the entire remainder of the sundress core.
my loyal sheep are making me doubt that theyre all loyal..
If it helps I didn't even realize you were voting Gamma I think their posts on page 12 were so bad they deserve a vote regardless
I don't really think Gamma's posts were that bad
and I don't like the phrasing of "deserve a vote", makes it kinda sound like your motivation is to punish Gamma for 'bad' posts more than you actually think Gamma is more likely to be scum
It's just my way of speaking obviously I'm not trying to "punish" Gamma I just mean it was scummy enough to be worth voting for pressure
Cuz GL coming in to question the Gamma wagon was town regardless of Gammas alignment and I liked that Meuh went to bat over it with GL when they could have let it go