Mini 2273: Science Diagrams That Look Like Shitposts 2 [END]

[GeorgeBailey]

I'm lurking cause I had an awful sleep last night, I can barely think.

I'll catch up tonight sorry

Beatlejuice
Beatlejuice

[gibus]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Really just coincidence.

[Crescent]

How interesting that I start a push on the two people who appear to be hiding from the game and then both of them show up in short order...

[Alexcellent]

Tbh the big push on Gibus feels bad. His ISO is lacking but I don't see anything that screams scum to me.

Also keen to hear from George.

P-Edit: pretty much what Vivax said. Looking forward to the catch up George.

[gibus]

Spoiler:

Alrighty. Making my own tentative list of townies and scum.

People who are probs good

Crescent
Vivax
Umlaut
Alex
Eiralox
Clidd

Peeps who need more analysis

Corwin
Goldfish
George
Owen
Gera

If they die I wouldn't mind

NotMaf
Gibus

Clidd's position here does bother me.
Could you walk me through your read?

[Crescent]

I'm lurking cause I had an awful sleep last night, I can barely think.

I'll catch up tonight sorry

Beatlejuice
Beatlejuice

Also this is another post that doesn't vibe remotely similarly to how he vibed in 2272. He didn't make joke posts like this.

[Crescent]

Tbh the big push on Gibus feels bad. His ISO is lacking but I don't see anything that screams scum to me.

Also keen to hear from George.

P-Edit: pretty much what Vivax said. Looking forward to the catch up George.

I went with the one who already had a vote. I didn't realize George also had one but I didn't want to split the votes any further.

But.... It did it's job, and got BOTH of them to post. My desire to kill George is still higher than my desire to kill Gibus.

UNVOTE: Gibus

[Eiralox]

@ Eiralox

Good morning.

UNVOTE: Corwinoid
VOTE: GeorgeBailey

Almost voted not_mafia, but it'd be more useful to keep him around as pet troll for now.
If he really triggers that many people to the point it's all I can read about, I'll reconsider.

Corwin/George looks like a good combo still.

ok, figured that post summed it up. As i told crescent i'll be looking at George so i'll prob give feedback on pos corwin/george in a day or what. corwin can still be town but there's a disconnect i'm feeling. their unvote on mafia i find interesting tho admittedly it can be non-indicative

[Alexcellent]

Crescent and Gibus are scum together, got it

Alexcellent,

considering the thread as it is now, is this pairing more or less probable since start of day one?

I was mainly joking there at the start, but less probable, IMO.
Feels like an unnecessary bus from Cres if they were both scum, given her whole spiel about how she rarely changes her vote after she makes it.

P-Edit: ... and she just unvoted. Nevermind.

[Crescent]

I made it clear when I voted that the scum equity wasn't high enough and the primary drive was to force the hiding players to post. My vote served it's intended purpose~

[Eiralox]

Spoiler:

Alrighty. Making my own tentative list of townies and scum.

People who are probs good

Crescent
Vivax
Umlaut
Alex
Eiralox
Clidd

Peeps who need more analysis

Corwin
Goldfish
George
Owen
Gera

If they die I wouldn't mind

NotMaf
Gibus

Clidd's position here does bother me.
Could you walk me through your read?

@Elsa this is an interesting question, i know ur reads have shifted by now but i do wonder why Goldfish is in the null pile while Clidd is not.

[Eiralox]

Crescent and Gibus are scum together, got it

Alexcellent,

considering the thread as it is now, is this pairing more or less probable since start of day one?

I was mainly joking there at the start, but less probable, IMO.
Feels like an unnecessary bus from Cres if they were both scum, given her whole spiel about how she rarely changes her vote after she makes it.

P-Edit: ... and she just unvoted. Nevermind.

ok cool beans

[Crescent]

Would sure be nice if anyone would compare GB here to Uncle Vanya last game because it's apparently the same person but there's exactly one post GB has made all game that vibes remotely similarly to the 27 he made last game.

I feel like there's been some active resistance from some people into actually looking into GB.

[Alexcellent]

Tbh the big push on Gibus feels bad. His ISO is lacking but I don't see anything that screams scum to me.

Also keen to hear from George.

P-Edit: pretty much what Vivax said. Looking forward to the catch up George.

I went with the one who already had a vote. I didn't realize George also had one but I didn't want to split the votes any further.

But.... It did it's job, and got BOTH of them to post. My desire to kill George is still higher than my desire to kill Gibus.

UNVOTE: Gibus

K, I just don't understand this or the motive behind it. Gibus isn't at any risk of immediate elimination, like there's no risk he's going to quickly be rushed to a hammer.
Are you genuinely happy with the content Gibus has provided since you voted him? What happens if he stops posting again, do you vote him again? Like I dunno if this is scummy or just perplexing to me.
Maybe it's a playstyle thing but it feels a lot more like you're being very careful and anxious about what wagon you're on.

Can I have your reads, please, Crescent?

[Crescent]

That said... I actually can't find a scum/scum motive there. I don't understand what my purpose would be in voting for him only to have him immediately post after because that would serve no value but to make him look worse. It's better just to nudge him into doing something without the theatrics because it gets him scum equity and reflects null on me. It's a net negative.

[Crescent]

Tbh the big push on Gibus feels bad. His ISO is lacking but I don't see anything that screams scum to me.

Also keen to hear from George.

P-Edit: pretty much what Vivax said. Looking forward to the catch up George.

I went with the one who already had a vote. I didn't realize George also had one but I didn't want to split the votes any further.

But.... It did it's job, and got BOTH of them to post. My desire to kill George is still higher than my desire to kill Gibus.

UNVOTE: Gibus

K, I just don't understand this or the motive behind it. Gibus isn't at any risk of immediate elimination, like there's no risk he's going to quickly be rushed to a hammer.
Are you genuinely happy with the content Gibus has provided since you voted him? What happens if he stops posting again, do you vote him again? Like I dunno if this is scummy or just perplexing to me.
Maybe it's a playstyle thing but it feels a lot more like you're being very careful and anxious about what wagon you're on.

Can I have your reads, please, Crescent?

No, I'm not, but Gibus was never my first choice anyway. I just went with the guy who A. Had a vote, and B. Someone I think is Town (Eiralox) was willing to vote. I went with the easier of the two to pressure into activity, because good lord this vote split is insane and anti-town and it's boggling my mind how no one can see having votes on NINE DIFFERENT PEOPLE is a bad thing.

GB has been my #1 for a good two days now, but people have constantly overlooked his total lack of existence for Gibus or for NM, or that he looks completely different from how he played in the very last game.


Eiralox is about as big a locktown as I'm ever putting someone on day 1.

You and Elsa are probably T/T but I don't have that same confidence thre.

Gera, Gibus, Corwi all also have varying degrees of scum equity. Clidd kinda does too for his awkwardness about Gera, but it did at least turn into a fair point against Gera.

I mean like... These are all things I've already said multiple times, except maybe the point on Corwi.

[Crescent]

I think a lot of the issue is when you're almost doubling #2 in posts and almost tripling #3 you just get asked a lot of questions you've already answered. This disparity was nowhere near this bad last game.

[Crescent]

And I'm on pace for significantly less posts on day 1, too.

zzzzzz.

[Alexcellent]

Thanks for your reads. It's good to get things summed up.

Goldfish/Unowen/Vivax are absent from that post, any thoughts on them?

[Crescent]

Thanks for your reads. It's good to get things summed up.

Goldfish/Unowen/Vivax are absent from that post, any thoughts on them?

Ah yes, I did have something to say about Vivax earlier that I forgot to rehash.

Gettin scum feels from George Bayleys series of posts as entrance.
Leaving it at that.

This looks pretty good if GB is in fact scum. My response to it looks comically bad if he's scum, too~

I briefly pointed out Unowen is a low poster that has pinged me in no specific direction somewhere in a single post. There's more of a natural flow to their posts than to GB's, but there isn't much there.

I don't think I've said anything about Goldfish the entire game. Like, anything at all. Maybe I should ISO them. Completely avoided my radar in every way. Like, I even said there were three "G" players earlier and then I realized Goldfish existed and actually made it 4.

[Crescent]

My one take from Goldfish ISO is they've occasionally defended other players but there's a vote on NM and nothing even resembling a scumread on anyone in there.

In the "needs to do more" pile as a result.

[Vivax]

My one take from Goldfish ISO is they've occasionally defended other players but there's a vote on NM and nothing even resembling a scumread on anyone in there.

In the "needs to do more" pile as a result.

There's this, where you = Alex as he was replying to him.

As for you/elsa, I think I coukd find reasons to scumread you both, I'm not going to take a side at this point.

His posts seem laid back/relaxed mostly, that looked townie to me so far.

[Vivax]

EBWOP

Her posts seem laid back/relaxed mostly, that looked townie to me so far.

[Crescent]

That line means nothing. "I think I could find reasons to scumread you both, but I'm not going to try" is a pretty blatant hedge. It's probably the worst thing about the ISO that it's the closest thing he has to making a scumread.

[Alexcellent]

@Crescent, why were you concerned about not splitting the votes earlier if you had no intention of eliminating Gibus and were going to unvote him anyway?