Your posts are constructive, reasonably aggressive, and based on solid justification. Nothing jumps out as a reason to sr you. The only reason you're not higher up is because I do not get the sense that you'd readily give something away as scum, so I can't really put a solid tr. It was a short read because I don't have many thoughts on you.In post 842, whiskey delta wrote:Quick thoughts before work:
@Cheapside - can you explain your read on me more? Also, irt Somnus - my read on D1 was based on them showing what I thought were obvious signs of irritability. Imagine that you’re on you’re fourth or fifth (?) game and have never rolled Town before. Suddenly this time you did. Would you be happy or mad about that? It’s odd to me that we have the same substance for a read but opposite conclusions. Am I wrong or do you just know better?
Also, if you are familiar at all with MU then you know your posts complaining about the game state would probably earn you some SRs. IME players who are mad because others post a lot are typically scum. A busy thread is a hard one to hide and blend into.
On the fourth game, I'd be resigned - and with a 2:1 winrate, calm and collected. I don't think it's strange that we've come to different conclusions based on psychological considerations, as neither of us know that much about Somnus' thought processes.
Complaints about activity being dubious is definitely fair enough, but it's easy enough to hide if >50% of the day is two people. Until my vote on Vasex, I seem to have been basically invisible to most players. That's precisely the problem with flooding the thread. In any case, people seem to be more interested in my reads than the complaint/vote yesterday, surpisingly enough.
