i hated this entrance at the time.In post 29, Vivax wrote:Gettin scum feels from George Bayleys series of posts as entrance.
Leaving it at that.
post 119 a vote for corwind
pairing up votesIn post 295, Vivax wrote:Good morning.
UNVOTE: Corwinoid
VOTE: GeorgeBailey
Almost voted not_mafia, but it'd be more useful to keep him around as pet troll for now.
If he really triggers that many people to the point it's all I can read about, I'll reconsider.
Corwin/George looks like a good combo still.
and back againIn post 424, Vivax wrote:Scummy post.In post 393, Corwinoid wrote:I really want to know what your fascination with me is. Since your RVS vote you haven't even looked anywhere else or engaged meaningfully with any other slot in the game. Seriously, what's going on here?In post 307, UNOwen wrote:Where is Corwin on your list and why?In post 305, Elsa Jay wrote: Won't say who yet but reading the last four pages made 2 people move up in my town list and 1 down. I'm here to interact all day as well.
VOTE: UNOwen
UNVOTE: GeorgeBailey
VOTE: Corwinoid
why do they care what their scum read thinks?In post 427, Vivax wrote:Do you have a townread on Corwin?In post 402, GeorgeBailey wrote:Agreed, Uno hasn't moved their vote since RVS and the shade in [post]307[post] feels like, er, posturing? Or would the right word be rallying.In post 398, Corwinoid wrote:Somewhat engaged how? The only people with less posts are gibus, GB and NM (and the mod), and almost half (5/13) of his posts including his RVS are engaging with me exclusively. This looks a lot more like someone trying to hide and shade a slot than any actual engagement.Crescent wrote:It's true he has not named anyone else as scummy, but he's also been somewhat engaged. I'm still null on Unowen though - It's nowhere near as bad as players like George.
Like whether or not they should move their vote in case there's any traction.
i think this is their only interaction with me up to this point. there ar emore after but nothing seriousIn post 599, Vivax wrote:When you come back, remember to do this.In post 513, geraintm wrote:Crescent, stop calling my random vote not random.
You are talking out of your ass.
I will ignore you the for the rest of the game because your insistence that you know my actions better than me is just baffling me.
weird post asking someone else for permission to voteIn post 676, Vivax wrote:And if the town doesn't vote Corwin, who should we be voting in your opinion?In post 675, Eiralox wrote:this can read null. it might be genuine town though-process coming from Corwin, and while I certainly wouldn't be thinking this way, it's not enough for a scum lean by itself. Corwin might merely be wondering why town! Vivax didn't do full private research regarding the setup(which, again, is not scummy on Vivax's part--- I myself stated my own ignorance on the matter.In post 588, Corwinoid wrote: No. I knew the game was Normal, and what invalid roles there are.
Someone genuinely trying to solve would want to know what they're up against.
This can be T/T.
George still?
back we go
Day 2....i dunno.
they are ignoring Corwin's claim which is weird.
i didn't liek their day 1 play, there are too many instances of just posts that are off to me and the fixation on george (town) and COrwin (who i am making the assumption is town at this point until proven otherwise, i cannot see their play today being from scum) looks so so bad.
considering the progression of their wagon today, i think id be ok with a vote there.
addendum
Not mafia is infuriating to play with. If town, they need to be sorted at some point through a night action or an elimination. if scum, they just get a free pass.
crescent - they feel like a different person on Day 2. they are just ignorning me - did i scare them off?