In post 1095, Vivax wrote:I'm gonna openly OMGUS this, go look at clidds reads, and call geraintm mafia for this. And because the logic to vote for me is hilariously lazy and he doesn't apply it in reverse.
And there's also your reason for clidd getting NKd.
So I guess my work here is done. I'll just sheep a good dead town, because it's what mafia wouldn't want me to do.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: geraintm
im like, the 4th person to vote you and you turn on me?
what do you mean by my my reason for clidd?
oh seen in a few posts down. you give me way more credit for noticing that clidd always thought me scum. and surely i would have picked on Crescent in that case, they hated me yesterday?
you look bad for wanting to get rid of Not mafia because a policy elimination right then was a terrible, terrible idea that felt like wanting to come from scum wanting an easy elimination of a townie - hence me saying if not mafia turns out green you looked awful.
you point out i didnt follow up on Alex the same way i have with you for doing the same thing with the policy elimination of not mafia - and i think i said i may have confirmation bias when looking at you so i guess that is fair. but i wasnt voting you for just the one thing, its been a whole host
In post 1101, Vivax wrote:And since every good coffin needs four nails, here's the final one:
Day 2....i dunno.
they are ignoring Corwin's claim which is weird.
What claim?
Did geraintm tell him to claim vig today or where does this come from.
ok, this is embarressing, i was 100% sure that they had said something like "with the infomation i have" when they voted for you - which i took to mean they had some info from a night action about your guilt. it was why i was looking so hard at you first.
but i cannot find it in their ISO, so now i am wondering why i ever thought it??
@corwin - did you say something like that?
because it was why i thought you were so likely town - i couldnt think scum would make that suggestion you had night info like that and make such a strong vote on vivax.
now though, with them moving their vote off you they clearly didnt have strong night info like i had assumed.
Post 1102 - it is comforting that crescent is agreeing with me liek this - not the first time i dont think ether.
In post 1103, Vivax wrote: In post 1102, Crescent wrote:To expand: You can't possibly think I look bad for wanting to launch NM today when he's still alive and you don't know his alignment.
*Raises hand*
The NM vote was legitimately bad because a vote on him that early in the day achieves absolutely nothing. It's the ultimate sinkhole. I've made it no secret I find him insufferable and want him out of this game, but rushing him out is not pro-town.
I'm only on phone at the moment so tabbing all over the place isn't an option but next up I'm taking a peek at Gera's day 2 ISO.
Not that NM matters now as for what I believe, I found the other mafia. You're kind of on an old page.
The argument is very bad as it puts something that happens in a possible future (NM dies and flips town) as a fact in the present (NM would die as town and that makes you look bad now).
this is horrible circular logic. you cannot find mafia because they thought you did something scummy - when you are talking to someone else who thinks you are scummy too! or have you found the whole team??
??
In post 1106, Vivax wrote:I was kind of drawing up a massive for almost an hour post when I started out wanting to make a simple flowchart in response to crescent.
But the end result is that crescent is likely mafia.
oh, you have found the whole scum team!
