BlueBloodedToffee (4): Alexcellent, Crsecent, Corwinoid, Elsa Jay
Crescent (1): Vivax
geraintm (1): BlueBloodedToffee
Not voting (1): Eiralox, gibus,
With 10 alive, it takes 6 to launch.
dis time
yep, feels like it
i got here as fast as i can (you can check, most of my big posts are about this time of day, i leave the game after work and don't always check at night)In post 1721, Crescent wrote:The one thing striking me about Gera is he had that big leadup post to voting Gibus and has since vanished off the map. I would like to hear his response to the claims we just had preferably while the day is still going.
really, you still havent caught up?In post 1729, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I can't say 100% as I still haven't read how D1 ended.
There seemed a good few possibilities though to be fair
i am looking at one particular player at a time, i don't ISO everyone at the same time so i never get to see different players doing the same thing and comment on it. that is why it would look like i am shading one person and ignoring others who do the same.In post 1730, Crescent wrote: One thing in particular he shades Gibus for is something other people in the game have done, and something you did it at virtually the same time he did (asking me to vote with him).
The complete... Nothingness from him since then raises more eyebrows, and I want to see what he has to say now. Gibus' wagon was never a wagon I trusted to begin with.
a whole bunch of us voted gibus, they have been awful at points this game (the nah post?) and you cant just dump on people who voted for themIn post 1746, Alexcellent wrote:Was it though?In post 1731, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:My case on Gibus was good.
i really, reallylike Day 2 Crescent. Day 1 not so much, but Day 2 yepIn post 1776, Crescent wrote:Actually BBT not only never shades Gera at any point, he has several posts in a row where he shades Gibus, then immediately votes Gera without a word after Gibus claims and asks people to join him.
He didn't even make an argument. The only one who made anything resembling an argument was me, and I did it well after BBT's vote.
even i know that putting out a no kill is bad - but whenthe other option is yuorself it looks terrible.In post 1810, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:They can elect not to kill
this is amusingIn post 1328, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Gibus wanting to elim GB in 425 literally came from nowhere.
This is a really bad post.
fairly sure this could be directed at them tooIn post 1550, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:BingoIn post 1548, Alexcellent wrote: Gibus’s town reads are easy to fabricate if he’s scum given the info he has.
we haev not mafia in the game, if you mean to hammer then do it.In post 1833, gibus wrote:Intent to hammer
Convenient. What are your abilities?In post 1840, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Fish rolecopped Owen N1