i just think in general, scum don't like attention drawn to them.
is that not something that lines up with what dwlees doing right now? only posting when they
It doesn't make any sense for marcistar to be scum...yet I did a great job framing her.In post 972, marcistar wrote:it doesn't make any sense for me to be scum here. shes clearly framed me well and like.. good job!
STD's doing that too now and you don't have him as Mafia.In post 975, marcistar wrote:not necessarily. i don't have a good memory so I don't remember dwlees scumgame at all.
i just think in general, scum don't like attention drawn to them.
is that not something that lines up with what dwlees doing right now? only posting when theyneedto? : D
This is in relation to the marci instavote, with Dwlee wondering why they get the towncred and Luke doesn't. I would again be pleasantly surprised if this was S/S theater. This is somewhat pedestrian.In post 53, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:its fake distancing bullshit if luke actually BELIEVED that shit he would've gotten his modkit and jumped into SGB to yeet herIn post 51, Dwlee99 wrote:Why Luke he called out Marci first
In post 175, Datisi wrote:vote count 1.03
with 3 possible channels to be assigned to, it takes 2 full channels to end the day. day 1 deadline is in (expired on 2022-06-23 12:30:00).
I am the one to flag the potential autoloss here from a scum votesplit. 2 out of 3 of the current SGB players (ie. 2 of the 3 players I can be partnered with) aren't voting. I instantly point out the scum autowin loophole and how to exploit it.In post 181, Faker wrote:I'm a bit concerned by this, it's already not possible in this game but this entails configurations such that scum can automatically force a win Day 1. It is actually pretty trivial for them to do so; if town are split into a configuration of exactly 1-1-1 with scum unassigned the scum have already won the game.In post 175, Datisi wrote:highlighting one of the rules here: if the day deadline runs out, the hackers will immediately win.
Perhaps this was intentional, but in my ruleset that was why I required at least one town player remaining unassigned for this to kick in.
Shoutout to my guy Luke in the graveyard. I disagree with this being an easier outright win for me (I think clearing RH9 and letting me try to pocket him goes better, and I think a lot of our dialogue today reinforces how I could accomplish that even as I struggle to read him) but close enough, still not really clear how this helped us win SGB.In post 300, Lukewarm wrote:I am disinclined to believe that the scum team would move town!marci to 1v1 with faker, simply because scum!faker could 1v1 most people, and I think that they would want her to go up against someone who was not already primed to lose a different minigame.
It would be like trading an win at SGB for a win at MD, but why prioritize giving your hard hitter an easier win, instead of prioritizing another scum player.
I'm sorry but who on earth looks at the extended dialogue with me/Pooky/Lukewarm,In post 448, marcistar wrote:oh yeah page 16 is horrible
its kinda funny but pooky looks so obviously scum from it. i dont think pooky is even trying to legitmately read the game.. he looks like hes just memeing
pooky do u seriously think penguins town rn?
I see.In post 988, Faker wrote:Right now I'd go on you (RH9), my posts on why I have Dragons-leantown and RH9-scumlean aren't at all related to interactions and are better off collated from ISO.
Have you checked Open 839, Open 838, Dragon Game and Micro 1036?In post 990, Faker wrote:I had a vague idea about how frequent you were with nuanced follow-ups to points people raised, taking them one step further for example, as I thought I remembered those happening in Open House. On quick skim, it wasn't very backed-up by your town posts in Holiday Dance, and I found a few scumpost examples in Guardians that could have fit that mold.
Got that.In post 990, Faker wrote:I'm also going to try to finish and finish my current read before I respond to any other questions you have.
Which one?In post 993, Faker wrote:Page 31 update: This minigame is actually so hard, holy shit
These are the posts that to me seem unpartnered. I suggested earlier maybe she's doing this intentionally to clear RH9, but I honestly don't think she's thinking this far ahead. I think she's just trying to convince herself she's town and saying whatever random defense she comes up with to whoever is nearby. Still...maybe +town for RH9.In post 787, RH9 wrote:I would say that from the posts that you've referenced, Faker is more or less just being assertive.In post 781, marcistar wrote:670 reads like shes trying to feed you a read a certain way (the explanation after the question makes it that way)In post 745, RH9 wrote:Good idea, actually.
Could you please find. examples of Faker buddying?
I probably missed them all.
681 same thing, shes trying to pick apart your reads and shoot down any progressive thought process.. but shes trying to do it in a way that won't agitate you. notice in the post how she hasnt said its a bad thought process at all? she just calls it "surprising" which is a sort of buddy buddy way of shooting down a read without making a person angry.
688 not buddying, but its like she isn't stating a suspicion on any of the stop getting banned players in that post; shes replying to you in a non accusatory way, she states somethings "in dwlees favor", she gives a "dragons isnt out of range" but in a half way where she doesnt use it further later on. she isnt hunting.
maybe buddying isnt the right word for these posts, its hard to do this while im tired..
alot of her posts regarding you is just asking questions/pushing your read forward which i view as a form of buddying. <670, 681 fit this> its like shes trying to get in your head and appear helpful and solving, when in reality she isn't putting in the work and she's making you do the brunt of it. she isnt outright doing stuff that will offend and trigger you, but shes doing it like back of the mind sort of thing
690 reads super buddyie imo
However, I still don't think that she is trying to directly buddy because I can't help advance her wincon if she's scum.
Yours, not mine lmaoIn post 994, RH9 wrote:Which one?In post 993, Faker wrote:Page 31 update: This minigame is actually so hard, holy shit
I see.In post 996, Faker wrote:Yours, not mine lmaoIn post 994, RH9 wrote:Which one?In post 993, Faker wrote:Page 31 update: This minigame is actually so hard, holy shit
I was about to say the same thing… stop stealing my ideas RH9In post 979, RH9 wrote:STD's doing that too now and you don't have him as Mafia.In post 975, marcistar wrote:not necessarily. i don't have a good memory so I don't remember dwlees scumgame at all.
i just think in general, scum don't like attention drawn to them.
is that not something that lines up with what dwlees doing right now? only posting when theyneedto? : D
He's drawing way less attention than Dwlee who posts every once in a while with something super bound to get attention.
Honestly, STD's way more better than Dwlee at not standing out and getting noticed.
Nothing personal.