That's one naked vote too many.
VOTE: BBT
I imagine my wagon looks like a convenient place to park a vote right now and BBT is pretty, you know, not present in the game.
That's one naked vote too many.
Roden seemed to have some insight into you, so I wanted to see what kind of insight you had in him. I don't think a "yes" or "no" means anything specific here. Just wondered what kind of reaction you'd get out of that.In post 1024, Galron wrote:Roden is going to scum read me regardless so I don't know. What would it mean to you if I said yes? What if I said no?In post 817, Rad wrote:@Galron - Based on your experience with Roden, is "Can we please scum read each other?" something you think would be risky to say to Roden as scum!Galron? Do you believe this statement from Roden?
We seem to scum read each other in about every game. But as I was skimming I saw something were he said he has had some irl changes that have affectied his mafia play. So maybe that isn't valid any longe.rIn post 1026, Rad wrote:Roden seemed to have some insight into you, so I wanted to see what kind of insight you had in him. I don't think a "yes" or "no" means anything specific here. Just wondered what kind of reaction you'd get out of that.In post 1024, Galron wrote:Roden is going to scum read me regardless so I don't know. What would it mean to you if I said yes? What if I said no?In post 817, Rad wrote:@Galron - Based on your experience with Roden, is "Can we please scum read each other?" something you think would be risky to say to Roden as scum!Galron? Do you believe this statement from Roden?
It would be good to have information rather than a senseless death no?In post 941, Bell wrote:I don't recall saying that Corwin was lying. I never think a person is lying about their circumstances nor do I doubt them. They can just be scum while also dealing with life stuff.
I also don't see how Corwin being eliminated now would be a bad thing beyond a loss of information this day phase. It is not something that is fundamentally bad to be voted out in a game of mafia.
VOTE: BellIn post 866, Dancing Puppets wrote:In post 847, Bell wrote:More corwinoid votes for saying they were gunna catch up and then never catching up.
Lim all liars.@Bell are you seriously kidding me?In post 640, Corwinoid wrote:I'm sorry everyone, I've been our the last day and a half with some unexpected family issues, I'm catching up now.
so why aren't you voting there, partner?In post 999, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I wouldn't like bet a kidney on it.In post 987, Cephrir wrote:pooky are you still sure this is scum because im notIn post 986, Frogsterking wrote:Nope, you asked and I answered. Posting style changes = meds wore off = probably an increase of "grenade style" posting like Bell was describing, among other things.
I don't see anything he's posted that makes me think oh yea this is town Frogster.
Wow, I didn't realize we were only 48 hours in. It feels like it's been a lot longer than that for me.In post 1034, T-Bone wrote:I understand that not all 25 player slots can be treated equally 48 hours into the game.
All in all, I think that Bell is town so far.In post 1034, T-Bone wrote:Low blow post on a VLA player aside, I feel a lot of manipulation coming from Bell's posts in the last 12 hours. Galton so helpfully quotes 941 for example. Bell is recanting now that there's pushback. Bell very clearly stated Corwin was lying about catching up. But in 941 we retcon to "oh well Corwin could just be scum because of random draw". (I am paraphrasing) Yeah, no shit. Then it's 'no big deal if we eliminate a content less player'. What a goalpost shift if I've ever saw one.
I'm also starting to find the way Bell decides whom to think could be scum or town to be arbitrary. I get that Bell is a meta player, and it's well documented I think meta is trash... but I feel Bell has applied this inconsistently thus far. Maybe someone else who feels like they use meta can comment on this. Some players get meta dives, some players get recollections from previous games, and some players Bell just takes someone else's word for it. I understand that not all 25 player slots can be treated equally 48 hours into the game. What Bell does feels to me more like just searching for an elimination for the sake of an elimination, rather than for the sake of eliminating scum. I know Bell has already said to the effect that he'll support any lim that isn't him but that's not really a defense for scummy behavior, just an excuse. It's way too early in the day phase for that.
The tl;dr is come to my aid trash meta users :p
This line in particular feels like you read that line from him completely divorced from the context of the conversation where he said itI know Bell has already said to the effect that he'll support any lim that isn't him but that's not really a defense for scummy behavior, just an excuse. It's way too early in the day phase for that.
Cephrir, are you secretly a Koba alt?
Bell had not claimed being in a PT with you.In post 1041, Taly wrote:Also Bell townlean for healthy caution in the PT
It appears that Bell has been on an anti-lurker sentiment outside of just CorwinoidIn post 657, Toogeloo wrote:My PT partner brought up the fact that they don't trust me, that I could be scum, and that I basically asked for a free pass through Day 1.
I don't agree with your interpretation of 878In post 1039, Lukewarm wrote:All in all, I think that Bell is town so far.In post 1034, T-Bone wrote:Low blow post on a VLA player aside, I feel a lot of manipulation coming from Bell's posts in the last 12 hours. Galton so helpfully quotes 941 for example. Bell is recanting now that there's pushback. Bell very clearly stated Corwin was lying about catching up. But in 941 we retcon to "oh well Corwin could just be scum because of random draw". (I am paraphrasing) Yeah, no shit. Then it's 'no big deal if we eliminate a content less player'. What a goalpost shift if I've ever saw one.
I'm also starting to find the way Bell decides whom to think could be scum or town to be arbitrary. I get that Bell is a meta player, and it's well documented I think meta is trash... but I feel Bell has applied this inconsistently thus far. Maybe someone else who feels like they use meta can comment on this. Some players get meta dives, some players get recollections from previous games, and some players Bell just takes someone else's word for it. I understand that not all 25 player slots can be treated equally 48 hours into the game. What Bell does feels to me more like just searching for an elimination for the sake of an elimination, rather than for the sake of eliminating scum. I know Bell has already said to the effect that he'll support any lim that isn't him but that's not really a defense for scummy behavior, just an excuse. It's way too early in the day phase for that.
The tl;dr is come to my aid trash meta users :p
That is a hyperbole, but the fact that he is the number two poster this game is a good sign for him in my opinion. Also tone stuff makes me think town.
This line in particular feels like you read that line from him completely divorced from the context of the conversation where he said itI know Bell has already said to the effect that he'll support any lim that isn't him but that's not really a defense for scummy behavior, just an excuse. It's way too early in the day phase for that.
Spoiler: Relevant Quotes
He had a distinct list of people he wanted to vote, I asked about 2 other people, he said that he would be willing to vote them (or anyone if he had too) but they were not his preference.
I feel like the context of that conversation makes the "It's way too early in the day phase for that." part of you point moot imo.
In post 1039, Lukewarm wrote:This line in particular feels like you read that line from him completely divorced from the context of the conversation where he said it
no, koba is a me alt
Taly, what made you think Bell had claimed?In post 1043, Taly wrote:Fuck, sorry Bell