What’s Dis?In post 3735, Frogsterking wrote:It's not fundamentally wrong dude,In post 3535, MathBlade wrote:Except this is fundamentally wrong.In post 3531, Frogsterking wrote:Replacements are more likely overall to be scum. I think context is important though. In this context I think players on a scum team who fall behind in a large game are more likely to replace out due to guilt of letting the team down.In post 3518, MathBlade wrote:Why?In post 3515, Frogsterking wrote:Yup Math is town.
Also, I feel like one of the replacements is probably scum
So I see there have been several rep-outs already and I'm thinking that the rep-out pool is a better place to hunt than the entire player list.
Replace outs are indicative of a player not playing/wanting to play/busy/RL/bans or millions of reasons.
Some games have replace outs from all town because town is losing or lack of cooperation or unfun.
This game is insanely large and we (from where I have caught up to) haven’t had a single wagon all fucking game except Cephrir and maybe one other person. That’s demoralizingyou are uninformed. These people at stanford used this very website as a corpus and showed that replace outs are more likely to be scum. You can find the corpus yourself online easily.
(