So Corwin really only mentions Mala in any significant capacity in a couple places. First his reads list:
Yeah I'd lean towards scum not placing fellow scum at the bottom of the list, but it's not alignment definitive by any means.
And second where he just points out that mala's also been low activity:
In post 1763, Corwinoid wrote:It concerns me, though, that Frog conveniently forgot about mala who's been both low activity and low content when she is posting. It annoyed the hell out of me that people were up my ass for dealing with life issues, when mala's getting a pass with posts like
Actually that he's looking at every *other* low activity player is bothersome.
But I give more weight to this being a consistency attack against Frog than a lurker push against Mala. A few posts before this in
1754 Frog points out lurkers getting a TR for bad reasons and names Taly and Dwlee. Mala is being used as an example here and is the best example to use regardless of Mala's alignment because Mala's content is all low effort meme stuff.
In post 1768, Corwinoid wrote: In post 1765, Frogsterking wrote:Not true, Luke and I both TR Mala slot. You can find the exact point I decided to rule out the Mala slot for D1 in my iso.
You want to help me out with that, because your mentions of mala in your iso go from "I have played scum with scum!Mala and town with scum!Mala and I admit their start seems a little different in this game." in
482, to town binning her for pooky's spreadsheet at
1260, to not mentioning her again a single time (at least by name) until just now.
Here he continues his consistency attack on Frog, still using Mala as an example of him being inconsistent.
In post 1843, Corwinoid wrote: In post 1823, Frogsterking wrote:
@Corwin
In post 1768, Corwinoid wrote: In post 1765, Frogsterking wrote:Not true, Luke and I both TR Mala slot. You can find the exact point I decided to rule out the Mala slot for D1 in my iso.
You want to help me out with that, because your mentions of mala in your iso go from "I have played scum with scum!Mala and town with scum!Mala and I admit their start seems a little different in this game." in
482, to town binning her for pooky's spreadsheet at
1260, to not mentioning her again a single time (at least by name) until just now.
This is possibly a contrived attempt at pretend-solving, I specifically decided to town bin Mala around the time I posted 482. That was my main motivation for sharing that comment in 482. Mala isn't mentioned again because I had no new takes on the slot. That's not difficult to understand. If you're town and this isn't pretend-solving, then stop shading my slot for no reason.
Holy shit dude, you made a read ~52 pages ago based on the start of the game, FoSed every other inactive player, and never looked twice at your very early read even given the "content" of her posts. And you don't think that's giving that slot a pass?
And again.
In post 1849, Corwinoid wrote: In post 1846, Cephrir wrote: In post 1843, Corwinoid wrote: In post 1823, Frogsterking wrote:
@Corwin
In post 1768, Corwinoid wrote: In post 1765, Frogsterking wrote:Not true, Luke and I both TR Mala slot. You can find the exact point I decided to rule out the Mala slot for D1 in my iso.
You want to help me out with that, because your mentions of mala in your iso go from "I have played scum with scum!Mala and town with scum!Mala and I admit their start seems a little different in this game." in
482, to town binning her for pooky's spreadsheet at
1260, to not mentioning her again a single time (at least by name) until just now.
This is possibly a contrived attempt at pretend-solving, I specifically decided to town bin Mala around the time I posted 482. That was my main motivation for sharing that comment in 482. Mala isn't mentioned again because I had no new takes on the slot. That's not difficult to understand. If you're town and this isn't pretend-solving, then stop shading my slot for no reason.
Holy shit dude, you made a read ~52 pages ago based on the start of the game, FoSed every other inactive player, and never looked twice at your very early read even given the "content" of her posts. And you don't think that's giving that slot a pass?
What's the difference between townreading and giving a pass? And why does this bother you so much?
Reads change, he's showing no interest in re-evaluating her while mudslinging half a dozen other people for exactly the same things. Which suggest his motivations about one or the other aren't entirely honest.
And again.
In post 1865, Corwinoid wrote: In post 1860, Cephrir wrote:granted ill reeval if mala continues to do nothing but im way happier with her than other low content slots right now so i can certainly understand how frogsterking arrived at the same conclusion
I am... actually surprised how acceptable I find this.
Hell, here he even suggests that Ceph's town read on Mala is acceptable
Maybe using Mala over Taly or Dwlee points to some alignment indication of Mala but I dunno. Mala is certainly the easiest of them all to point at and say "see Mala's not doing anything and just memeing" but that's because it's just the truth.
I believe, based on past experience with corwin, that he probably DID have actual time issues and this was legitimately frustrating for him. If scum!Mala had already said they can bus her if they want cause she's just going to lurk through this entire game, then this is incredibly easy for corwin to do. It's easy for corwin to push town!Mala here too, but that's because Mala just isn't townie in this game, especially not earlier.
I'll take a look at Math's interactions later. I'm not sold on Corwin clearing Mala from this.