In post 668, Aristeia wrote:This is KT's first post with suspicion;
atp in time the only people who had voted for Loki Dokie are Dannflor and Fireisredsir, fire had unvoted at this point.
~ 3 hours later - Roden votes for Loki Dokie
188
KT comes back and reiterates his position here:
In post 369, KittyTacky wrote:I will repeat that the string of naked votes on Loki is just HMMMMMMM to me.
which is incongruent with:
I don't see how you can suspect naked Loki voters and also be null on someone who fits your criteria.
Roden did not make any other content and just making a naked vote isn't enough to sus him.
When I press KT on which Loki voters he suspects, his response is:
In post 548, KittyTacky wrote:The ones who actually gave content so far. I can't read someone who made so few posts at all regardless of if they made a naked vote or not.
Which implies that he is scumreading one of the other loki voters for their content - but he hasn't actually explained specifically what content he is suspecting.
I further push him to be specific about who he is scumreading at he responds with:
In post 630, KittyTacky wrote: In post 553, Aristeia wrote: In post 548, KittyTacky wrote: In post 375, Aristeia wrote:
I don't understand how you can sus the loki voters and also be null on roden
this feels like a contradiction to me.
I'm not heavily scumreading the Loki voters. And explain how is it a contradiction?
The ones who actually gave content so far. I can't read someone who made so few posts at all regardless of if they made a naked vote or not.
name names
Don't like Dannflor, mostly.
Now this is weird to me because
(1) he's given absolutely no indication prior to this point that Dannflor is a person of interest or suspect for him.
I did though, see my previous comments.
There's no indication in his iso that he suspects Dannflor at all.
(2) in fact he even sheeps Dannflor with this vote:
In post 552, KittyTacky wrote: In post 450, Radical Rat wrote:Dear God, this whole "I don't get scumread" thing is insufferable.
I don't think it's necessarily scummy, because the same thing happened somewhat in Terminator, but it IS obnoxious and makes the game way harder to follow for anyone else.
Anyway,
VOTE: Greeting
Ignoring the actual substance of posts in favor of superficial "tells" is probably as scummy as it's gonna get D1.
Did a reread of the whole game so far, yeah I can sheep this.
VOTE: Greeting
I can sheep a case by someone else that someone I sussed is voting too.
(3) all of his responses to me feel manufactured on the spot and not part of an actual thought process to find scum. I would guess that his initial comment about the Loki voters wasn't real suspicion and really just playing on Loki's extreme sensitivity to being suspected to try to pocket Loki. Which is why he is having such a hard time actually showing any thought process that involves actually pushing or suspecting any of the people who naked voted Loki to begin with.
No that's just my writing style. I'm always sorta detached from the game.