In post 8, Ausuka wrote:This is a pretty standard game opener for this site, I didn't really have anything to say to you because nothing you said was alignment indicative, sorry for ignoring you
yeah your opener pretty paint by numbers but you're aware so
like
vote someone
say something about someone else in same post
encourage engagement
make an early read!!
the swans, in discouragement, have migrated from the poisonous lakes this evening
wonderfullest things are ever the unmentionable; deep memories yield no epitaphs;
it then — it — abandon of the impersonal — of the infini-
tive — at last resigned — to embody — with flesh in pain
— to embody like the thumbnail — it then
In post 25, Ausuka wrote:Not sure what you're trying to say here.
though i am now kinda curious what else you could have thought i was trying to say there (also to me i am simply saying it not trying to say but i understand that i am often unclear and am happy to clarify)
the swans, in discouragement, have migrated from the poisonous lakes this evening
wonderfullest things are ever the unmentionable; deep memories yield no epitaphs;
it then — it — abandon of the impersonal — of the infini-
tive — at last resigned — to embody — with flesh in pain
— to embody like the thumbnail — it then
the swans, in discouragement, have migrated from the poisonous lakes this evening
wonderfullest things are ever the unmentionable; deep memories yield no epitaphs;
it then — it — abandon of the impersonal — of the infini-
tive — at last resigned — to embody — with flesh in pain
— to embody like the thumbnail — it then
the swans, in discouragement, have migrated from the poisonous lakes this evening
wonderfullest things are ever the unmentionable; deep memories yield no epitaphs;
it then — it — abandon of the impersonal — of the infini-
tive — at last resigned — to embody — with flesh in pain
— to embody like the thumbnail — it then
In post 25, Ausuka wrote:Not sure what you're trying to say here.
though i am now kinda curious what else you could have thought i was trying to say there (also to me i am simply saying it not trying to say but i understand that i am often unclear and am happy to clarify)
I didn't really know. I mean, I think talking about my opener being textbook RVS seems somewhat nonsensical? It's the very start of the game, there aren't many options.
I don't really have a feeling about hoppip. Maybe I will later, idk.
Pedit: I'm trying to ask, like, what are you getting at with what you're saying? Were you just narrating my play?
In post 25, Ausuka wrote:Not sure what you're trying to say here.
though i am now kinda curious what else you could have thought i was trying to say there (also to me i am simply saying it not trying to say but i understand that i am often unclear and am happy to clarify)
I didn't really know. I mean, I think talking about my opener being textbook RVS seems somewhat nonsensical? It's the very start of the game, there aren't many options.
I don't really have a feeling about hoppip. Maybe I will later, idk.
Pedit: I'm trying to ask, like, what are you getting at with what you're saying? Were you just narrating my play?
you made very common opener, which you were aware of and said when asked, i guess i was thinking through the noteworthiness of nuclear gandhi's questioning of it and your response to it
shrug
i guess i don't really understand as it still kinda feels like you're just doing the engagement thing with me but that's more player indicative and not alignment indicative so
the swans, in discouragement, have migrated from the poisonous lakes this evening
wonderfullest things are ever the unmentionable; deep memories yield no epitaphs;
it then — it — abandon of the impersonal — of the infini-
tive — at last resigned — to embody — with flesh in pain
— to embody like the thumbnail — it then
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
In post 25, Ausuka wrote:Not sure what you're trying to say here.
though i am now kinda curious what else you could have thought i was trying to say there (also to me i am simply saying it not trying to say but i understand that i am often unclear and am happy to clarify)
I didn't really know. I mean, I think talking about my opener being textbook RVS seems somewhat nonsensical? It's the very start of the game, there aren't many options.
I don't really have a feeling about hoppip. Maybe I will later, idk.
Pedit: I'm trying to ask, like, what are you getting at with what you're saying? Were you just narrating my play?
you made very common opener, which you were aware of and said when asked, i guess i was thinking through the noteworthiness of nuclear gandhi's questioning of it and your response to it
shrug
i guess i don't really understand as it still kinda feels like you're just doing the engagement thing with me but that's more player indicative and not alignment indicative so
like it's not like i thought
"and now i will narrate ausuka's play"
but if you want to describe my posting that way you probable can it's not not applicable ya know
the swans, in discouragement, have migrated from the poisonous lakes this evening
wonderfullest things are ever the unmentionable; deep memories yield no epitaphs;
it then — it — abandon of the impersonal — of the infini-
tive — at last resigned — to embody — with flesh in pain
— to embody like the thumbnail — it then
In post 32, Ausuka wrote:I don't really have a feeling about hoppip. Maybe I will later, idk.
Why bring it up then?
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
the swans, in discouragement, have migrated from the poisonous lakes this evening
wonderfullest things are ever the unmentionable; deep memories yield no epitaphs;
it then — it — abandon of the impersonal — of the infini-
tive — at last resigned — to embody — with flesh in pain
— to embody like the thumbnail — it then
can you at least do whatever it is you would do to sort me as it feels like the extent of your scumread if you're town is simply that i do not communicate effectively which is obvious and i would rather this not continue to detract from us finding mafias
the swans, in discouragement, have migrated from the poisonous lakes this evening
wonderfullest things are ever the unmentionable; deep memories yield no epitaphs;
it then — it — abandon of the impersonal — of the infini-
tive — at last resigned — to embody — with flesh in pain
— to embody like the thumbnail — it then
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
can you at least do whatever it is you would do to sort me as it feels like the extent of your scumread if you're town is simply that i do not communicate effectively which is obvious and i would rather this not continue to detract from us finding mafias
I think 22 is weird considering you say you're not scumreading me - tonally it doesn't sit right with me, especially the double exclamation points
What mafias should I be looking at right now instead?
In post 40, inutile wrote:i would rather this not continue to detract from us finding mafias
Oh it will.
You've both helped me though, so it balances out.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
can you at least do whatever it is you would do to sort me as it feels like the extent of your scumread if you're town is simply that i do not communicate effectively which is obvious and i would rather this not continue to detract from us finding mafias
I think 22 is weird considering you say you're not scumreading me - tonally it doesn't sit right with me, especially the double exclamation points
What mafias should I be looking at right now instead?
It's called elimination by pathing. If the scum team can't figure out what I'm doing they're going to have to kill me.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
can you at least do whatever it is you would do to sort me as it feels like the extent of your scumread if you're town is simply that i do not communicate effectively which is obvious and i would rather this not continue to detract from us finding mafias
I think 22 is weird considering you say you're not scumreading me - tonally it doesn't sit right with me, especially the double exclamation points
What mafias should I be looking at right now instead?
? it could easily be explained as coming from either mafia or town, why would i only consider the scumread aspect of it?
the only read i am currently sure of is that i am town, thus, anyone else
i wasn't saying,
go look at X instead
i was if you're town look at me however it is you do so because i am town and the sooner you discover that the better for the game
like i am willing to walk through the same five posts or whatever forever if necessary
but they seem to be a much bigger deal to non-me parties than they are to me i was simply thinking through the interaction between you and nuclear gandhi as i read it
the swans, in discouragement, have migrated from the poisonous lakes this evening
wonderfullest things are ever the unmentionable; deep memories yield no epitaphs;
it then — it — abandon of the impersonal — of the infini-
tive — at last resigned — to embody — with flesh in pain
— to embody like the thumbnail — it then
can you at least do whatever it is you would do to sort me as it feels like the extent of your scumread if you're town is simply that i do not communicate effectively which is obvious and i would rather this not continue to detract from us finding mafias
I think 22 is weird considering you say you're not scumreading me - tonally it doesn't sit right with me, especially the double exclamation points
What mafias should I be looking at right now instead?
? it could easily be explained as coming from either mafia or town, why would i only consider the scumread aspect of it?
the only read i am currently sure of is that i am town, thus, anyone else
i wasn't saying,
go look at X instead
i was if you're town look at me however it is you do so because i am town and the sooner you discover that the better for the game
like i am willing to walk through the same five posts or whatever forever if necessary
but they seem to be a much bigger deal to non-me parties than they are to me i was simply thinking through the interaction between you and nuclear gandhi as i read it
like i came to the game and thought,
oh hoppip voted me maybe i know hoppip
and then
hm, that was a kinda weird interaction between ausuka and nuclear gandhi, lemme see what ausuka might have been doing and why nuclear gandhi might have thought it was noteworthy
and that was pretty much the extent of it
and it feels like you're now scumreading me because i did not communicate that well
like i use exclamations like that a lot i don't really know what to tell you there
the swans, in discouragement, have migrated from the poisonous lakes this evening
wonderfullest things are ever the unmentionable; deep memories yield no epitaphs;
it then — it — abandon of the impersonal — of the infini-
tive — at last resigned — to embody — with flesh in pain
— to embody like the thumbnail — it then
can you at least do whatever it is you would do to sort me as it feels like the extent of your scumread if you're town is simply that i do not communicate effectively which is obvious and i would rather this not continue to detract from us finding mafias
I think 22 is weird considering you say you're not scumreading me - tonally it doesn't sit right with me, especially the double exclamation points
What mafias should I be looking at right now instead?
It's called elimination by pathing. If the scum team can't figure out what I'm doing they're going to have to kill me.
Also Asuka, the irony in your statement about the mafias is that there is 1 scum who is findable already. You didn't notice them because you were distracted by your fight with inutile. You and inutile are fighting because you're both Town and you both have conviction in your right to be here.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
In post 47, Frogsterking wrote:Also Asuka, the irony in your statement about the mafias is that there is 1 scum who is findable already. You didn't notice them because you were distracted by your fight with inutile.
Is it you?
You seem to have this idea in your head that I'm tunneled because I voted someone on page 2. Maybe I just don't agree with your read? Who knows.