I never explained this vote.
I was fed up of Frogsterking going "Delta/Gandhi/MND are being so sus rn it's really confbiasing my confbias about my Delta/Gandhi/MND solve look at me guys I'm confbiasing so hard rn".
It seemed LAMIST and fake.
I never explained this vote.
Take out Frog obviously, put MND in, put Gandhi inIn post 363, furtiveglance wrote:I'd say I wouldn't vote you/DeltaWave/Frog/Greeting/Hoppip/Inutile today.In post 362, Ausuka wrote:Who is town or mafia in this game?In post 359, Mohab500 wrote:I mean, in most cases doesn't recognising town mean you also recognise mafia as its either town or mafia?In post 358, furtiveglance wrote:I find town easier to recognise than mafia in general.In post 357, Ausuka wrote:That argument makes no sense. Obviously nothing is perfectly scum indicative. By that logic you shouldn't be scumreading Juice. They're just doing whatever they want as well, you just have a cookie cutter idea of what town play looks like.
No? Where did you get that from?In post 740, Frogsterking wrote:So in 733 you're stating that in 707 you intentionally withheld information you were aware of in order to make hutmeil look worse?In post 733, Mapuche Never Die wrote:I do get that hutmeil townreads you for taking Juice off E-1. I still think that’s scummy on hutmeil’s side.In post 731, Frogsterking wrote:I don't think anyone wants to read this level 0 analysis bullshit. Hutmeil townread my unvote in 403 because it took juice off e-1. Realizing that is like...not even an original take on its own and you missed that point completely. Why bother catching up post-by-post if the given analysis is LESS detailed than someone can muster by skimming the thread and blurting out obvious things?In post 707, Mapuche Never Die wrote:hutmeil votes Juice, then gives Frogster townpoints for unvoting juiceIn post 404, hutmeil wrote:Nice. I guess townie points for you. I'm still waiting for your survey though.
MND towniest, Hoppip town, Greeting least townIn post 754, Ausuka wrote:Furtive can you talk about your MND/greeting/hoppip reads
If you don't have much time I'm most interested in the greeting one I think
Pedit: Hutmeil was being sarcastic
But when has anyone ever voted due to wagon composition?In post 757, furtiveglance wrote:Wagon composition suggests I should vote for hutmeil seeing as we're nearing crunch time
I think hutmeil is town, same with MND. If my dream vote on Frog won't go through today I'd vote Greeting.In post 757, furtiveglance wrote:Wagon composition suggests I should vote for hutmeil seeing as we're nearing crunch time
Alright I skimmed the isos. I had some reservations that hutmeil rolled their first TPR, but one hutmeil's completed games was as a mason and that iso looks significantly better than this one.In post 745, Ausuka wrote:I'd be willing to consider it. I've read his other games to compare, and I don't think his playstyle explains his play here, though. I also think, while people pleasing could explain some of his scummy behaviour, there are other things I scumread that would not be explained by that.In post 743, Frogsterking wrote:@Ausuka
Are you open to the idea that hutmeil's townplay has qualities of people pleasing which is the cause of their scummy appearance in this game?
Just be thankful furtiveglance isn't a RadiantCowbells alt.In post 760, Ausuka wrote:I'm just confused. Why are you townreading hutmeil when he wasn't in your earlier list of townreads? And the whole move where you propose to vote Hutmeil and then make two new posts saying "no Actually I don't want to do that" just feels... strange.
It's worth pointing out that this is more likely to annoy you if you know that I'm Town scumreading Town for stupid reasons. If you're playing from an uninformed perspective how are you so sure that my solve is bad that you're getting annoyed by me pushing it etc.In post 750, furtiveglance wrote:I never explained this vote.
I was fed up of Frogsterking going "Delta/Gandhi/MND are being so sus rn it's really confbiasing my confbias about my Delta/Gandhi/MND solve look at me guys I'm confbiasing so hard rn".
It seemed LAMIST and fake.
Hutmeil was previously not in the townreads because they did nothing towny. But given the urgency of the situation, I decided to reread their ISO and simplify my read on them to the binary level, and I think they're town. What I really want is for you and Delta to get off Hutmeil, I suppose that was the point to the multiple posts, if there was a point.In post 760, Ausuka wrote:I'm just confused. Why are you townreading hutmeil when he wasn't in your earlier list of townreads? And the whole move where you propose to vote Hutmeil and then make two new posts saying "no Actually I don't want to do that" just feels... strange.
Ok, why is he townIn post 764, furtiveglance wrote:Hutmeil was previously not in the townreads because they did nothing towny. But given the urgency of the situation, I decided to reread their ISO and simplify my read on them to the binary level, and I think they're town. What I really want is for you and Delta to get off Hutmeil, I suppose that was the point to the multiple posts, if there was a point.In post 760, Ausuka wrote:I'm just confused. Why are you townreading hutmeil when he wasn't in your earlier list of townreads? And the whole move where you propose to vote Hutmeil and then make two new posts saying "no Actually I don't want to do that" just feels... strange.
Uninformed doesn't mean clueless, I have thoughts about the game. You're calling 2 townreads and a null read the scumteam, I'm sure it's not correct. Besides, the manner of your self-conscious proclamations of 'confbias' (an affliction which only troubles town) was more than a little overdone. You were acting.In post 763, Frogsterking wrote:It's worth pointing out that this is more likely to annoy you if you know that I'm Town scumreading Town for stupid reasons. If you're playing from an uninformed perspective how are you so sure that my solve is bad that you're getting annoyed by me pushing it etc.In post 750, furtiveglance wrote:I never explained this vote.
I was fed up of Frogsterking going "Delta/Gandhi/MND are being so sus rn it's really confbiasing my confbias about my Delta/Gandhi/MND solve look at me guys I'm confbiasing so hard rn".
It seemed LAMIST and fake.
This is a weird thing to fake if you're mafia.In post 132, hutmeil wrote:UNVOTE: Furtive
I had the same question as him for Frog which I TR him for.
We're disagreeing about a lot.In post 768, Ausuka wrote:I really disagree and struggle to see what you're seeing in that
I am scumleaning you - you are probably more likely to be town than scum but I think you are >Rand likely to be scum hereIn post 769, furtiveglance wrote:We're disagreeing about a lot.In post 768, Ausuka wrote:I really disagree and struggle to see what you're seeing in that
What's annoying me is that we're disagreeing, you're scumreading me, but I'm townreading you. I wouldn't blame an observer for scumreading me just based on that. Are you still scumreading me or can you afford me level ground?
the scumhunting feels genuine. it seems like they're really trying to consider the game in a way that doesn't seem calculated. but like i said before, i'm not happy with the fact that gandhi will never catch up at this rate and i'd like to see more real participation.In post 729, Nero Cain wrote:why you town reading MND and Gandhi. I think you were asked both.
he replaced in late d1 what do you expect my guyIn post 770, Nero Cain wrote: I think MND's plodding catchup is fake.