I intend to look at eiralox's prior games but I do agree with you on the diff in the specific post you referencedIn post 1224, fireisredsir wrote:i feel like i had an actually kinda good point on eiralox and got zero engagement on it
Questioning a vote is not defending.In post 1208, VP Baltar wrote:Ari is definitely soft defending FB by questioning my vote there. How would you describe it?In post 1203, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 1179, Gamma Emerald wrote:wut?In post 1169, VP Baltar wrote:FB, what do you think of ari's meta defense of you?
Pretty sure Ari is doing to opposite of defending FBVP Balter, you gonna explain what made you think this?
Did you read ari's post? It was definitely a defense.In post 1226, Gamma Emerald wrote:Questioning a vote is not defending.In post 1208, VP Baltar wrote:Ari is definitely soft defending FB by questioning my vote there. How would you describe it?In post 1203, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 1179, Gamma Emerald wrote:wut?In post 1169, VP Baltar wrote:FB, what do you think of ari's meta defense of you?
Pretty sure Ari is doing to opposite of defending FBVP Balter, you gonna explain what made you think this?
*Bernie meme something something voting pweaseIn post 1230, T3 wrote:Not voting (7): Juice, marcistar, xofelf, Dunnstral, Eiralox, DeasVail
ok I've glanced through some Eiralox games and they don't seem to have any completed scum games? which is something I was kinda hoping to look at to compare as a baselineIn post 1224, fireisredsir wrote:i feel like i had an actually kinda good point on eiralox and got zero engagement on it
idk if that's meaningful or not
maybe it means nobody else thinks it was a good point. or maybe it means nobody is more aware than normal about pushes on eiralox bc nobody here is partnered with them. idk
also this GL vs VP thing is super uninteresting to me, maybe datisi is right
I think it was a reasonable interpretation given you were agreeing with a post by fire that was explaining a townread on me.In post 1063, GuiltyLion wrote:I think you're reading something into my post that isn't there, I was giving HEM a follow up to my initial response to his question about that post in 925. You're correct I am not trying to sort you with that post, I am not trying to give or justify a townread on you there eitherIn post 970, DeasVail wrote:This would be a very narrow thing to base a read of me on though. Fireisred gets away with it because of our previous game, but you seem to be, I suppose, dismissing the read on me rather than actually trying to sort me
I don't really like the suggestion in your later post that just because I'm not actively trying to sort you means I'm not actively trying to sort in general.I had 20+ pages to catch up on last night and I was stoned, and I didn't have any major issues with anything you had posted. If HEM hadn't asked I probably wouldn't have commented on you at all. That doesn't mean sorting isn't or won't happen, give it time
What did you want me to hang around for?In post 1240, humaneatingmonkey wrote:aww you cant hang around?
A few people townread me now, so you're probably going to have to do better than thatIn post 1242, Nero Cain wrote:no, his time is divided between here and the mafia pt.
how does it make you feel?In post 1246, Nero Cain wrote:I know, it's a bit of a trolly comment. Just say that you are sorting and they town read you. I told you it was going to be easy to fool them.
I don't recall you being so condescending when we've played together before.In post 1232, GuiltyLion wrote:namely his bad questions
