Datisi's Café [game over!]

[Vivax]

That petapan fellow has my hair and a good banner.

bc this game doesn't have a postcap and larges can sometimes get kinda miserable without one, if d1 starts to get close to like idk 80-100 pages i suggest we simply yeet someone

who wants to join me on this mission

we need 10 more to sign the pact

VOTE: ausuka

What's the mission and what's the pact?

[mastina]

I'm on a path that is intertwined with
A debt that's paid when the world goes silent

Me too

Hope it's soon cause I've been on the party path for 3 years and don't want regrets

Town.

[fireisredsir]

alright we have 2 votes for 50 i can work with that

vivax the mission is to avoid d1 thread bloat that will make the game unreadable and a slog and make everyone apathetic and want to die

the pact is that if the thread gets too big, we yeet someone

[Nero Cain]

VOTE: mastina

[mastina]

this is not a mod note.

Almost missed this, but town.

[mastina]

VOTE: Ausuka

VOTE: Ircher

Scum.

[mastina]

bc this game doesn't have a postcap and larges can sometimes get kinda miserable without one, if d1 starts to get close to like idk 80-100 pages i suggest we simply yeet someone

who wants to join me on this mission

we need 10 more to sign the pact

VOTE: ausuka

Probably a scum try hard, which on D1 is a treat-as-town.

[Vivax]

bc this game doesn't have a postcap and larges can sometimes get kinda miserable without one, if d1 starts to get close to like idk 80-100 pages i suggest we simply yeet someone

who wants to join me on this mission

we need 10 more to sign the pact

VOTE: ausuka

Probably a scum try hard, which on D1 is a treat-as-town.

I townread you for this.
I have some reservations about fire's tone from when they replied to me as well.

[Vivax]

as petapan was saying that, Malakittens, Lukewarm, Titus, Andresvmb, and fireisredsir

Host solved the game for us we got em

VOTE: lukewarm

[fireisredsir]

(those are the people who played in datisi's previous large theme, ktane)

except im actually lukewarm in that game lore-wise so idk how that works, exactly

[Lukewarm]

I have not been having a lot of fun with Day 1 of large games. So I might try to coast this one out.

But I also might be bad at sticking to that lol.

But for now, and until I inevitably fail at holding back, Peta I declare you a double voter

VOTE: Klick

[Roden]

bc this game doesn't have a postcap and larges can sometimes get kinda miserable without one, if d1 starts to get close to like idk 80-100 pages i suggest we simply yeet someone

who wants to join me on this mission

we need 10 more to sign the pact

VOTE: ausuka

let's do 50

I'm down.

[Lukewarm]

Hi y'all, I'm gonna be fully transparent with this:

I am setting my productivity to 0% today.

You may call that anti-town as much as you want; you can consider it suspicious as much as you want. Which is fair. The scum extra kill mechanism is ludicrously strong and I am fully aware of the risks.

But I have very strong reasons for doing so. I promise that by D4, you'll know why.
I won't go 0% more than once.

But for ~reasons~ I need to go 0% today. Let's just say I'll become a scumhunting GOD.

I kinda feel like you should have just done this, and not declared it tbh.

Are you basically claiming that you have a power worth the over all productivity taking a hit?

Conversely, people probably should not declare intent to go to 100% productivity, because that is paramount to claiming either a VT or a PR with a bad ability.

[mastina]

I have not been having a lot of fun with Day 1 of large games. So I might try to coast this one out.

But I also might be bad at sticking to that lol.

But for now, and until I inevitably fail at holding back, Peta I declare you a double voter

VOTE: Klick

Oh is this the mythical Lukewarm scumgame?

...'Cause it looks like a mythical Lukewarm scumgame.

[Lukewarm]

As long as we achieve 1,275 points out of 1,700 points each day, we will be fine. If mastina is setting hers to 0%, then we need to average 80 points per player to avoid the extra night kills.

Is this just you guessing that this game is a 17:4, or did I miss that info somewhere, or?

[mastina]

Hi y'all, I'm gonna be fully transparent with this:

I am setting my productivity to 0% today.

You may call that anti-town as much as you want; you can consider it suspicious as much as you want. Which is fair. The scum extra kill mechanism is ludicrously strong and I am fully aware of the risks.

But I have very strong reasons for doing so. I promise that by D4, you'll know why.
I won't go 0% more than once.

But for ~reasons~ I need to go 0% today. Let's just say I'll become a scumhunting GOD.

I kinda feel like you should have just done this, and not declared it tbh.

Are you basically claiming that you have a power worth the over all productivity taking a hit?

Conversely, people probably should not declare intent to go to 100% productivity, because that is paramount to claiming either a VT or a PR with a bad ability.

I have my reasons.

I legit feel that me declaring this could break the game for the town.

The WHY is something that the scum will have to speculate about.

[Lukewarm]

Hi y'all, I'm gonna be fully transparent with this:

I am setting my productivity to 0% today.

You may call that anti-town as much as you want; you can consider it suspicious as much as you want. Which is fair. The scum extra kill mechanism is ludicrously strong and I am fully aware of the risks.

But I have very strong reasons for doing so. I promise that by D4, you'll know why.
I won't go 0% more than once.

But for ~reasons~ I need to go 0% today. Let's just say I'll become a scumhunting GOD.

I kinda feel like you should have just done this, and not declared it tbh.

Are you basically claiming that you have a power worth the over all productivity taking a hit?

Conversely, people probably should not declare intent to go to 100% productivity, because that is paramount to claiming either a VT or a PR with a bad ability.

I have my reasons.

I legit feel that me declaring this could break the game for the town.

The WHY is something that the scum will have to speculate about.

You already did it, so pointless to tell you really - regardless of your reasons.

But I did want to point out to other people that I think that they probably should not declare their intent one way or the other, because it is basically claiming to be a RP or a VT.

really just structured as commenting on you doing it, since that is what sparked the thought in my head.

[Roden]

2. using town power roles:

~ during each day, each member of the town may choose how productive they're going to be at work that day, ranging from 0% to 100%.
~ if they do not submit anything, they will default to 100% productivity.
~ at the start of each night, each town member will gain [100% minus their productivity that day] productivity percentage points.
~ for example, if they were 75% productive on d1, they will gain 25% productivity percentage points at the start of n1.
~ in order to use their power role, they must have the needed number of productivity percentage points, as said in their role pm.
~ productivity percentage points do not have to be used immediately, and they do not disappear if not used immediately.

If I understand this right, if we put in 50% productivity then we'll regain 50% back, keeping us at 100% productivity for the next day. Is there any reason that VTs and anyone with abilities that cost 50% or less shouldn't always put in at least 50%?

[Lukewarm]

2. using town power roles:

~ during each day, each member of the town may choose how productive they're going to be at work that day, ranging from 0% to 100%.
~ if they do not submit anything, they will default to 100% productivity.
~ at the start of each night, each town member will gain [100% minus their productivity that day] productivity percentage points.
~ for example, if they were 75% productive on d1, they will gain 25% productivity percentage points at the start of n1.
~ in order to use their power role, they must have the needed number of productivity percentage points, as said in their role pm.
~ productivity percentage points do not have to be used immediately, and they do not disappear if not used immediately.

If I understand this right, if we put in 50% productivity then we'll regain 50% back, keeping us at 100% productivity for the next day. Is there any reason that VTs and anyone with abilities that cost 50% or less shouldn't always put in at least 50%?

I don't think you are reading that right. My understanding is that

Every Start of Day, you get 100% productivity points. You chose how many to give to the Cafe that day (x)

You get [100 - x] points to power your pr, that you can bank.

VTs should put 100% to the Cafe during the day, because they have no pr to power.

Mastina is giving 0 to the Cafe, so she will have 100 points for her pr

[Lukewarm]

Calling what you give the Cafe "productivity", and calling the points you power a pr with "productivity points" does make it kinda confusing terminology wise

[fireisredsir]

i think of it like every day you get 100 cookies

you choose how many cookies you want to eat

the remaining cookies at the start of the night get put in the bank

at night if you have a role then you can use it by spending your banked cookies

and if town collectively banks too many cookies at once then maf get to shoot more people

then the next day you get 100 fresh cookies and do the same thing again. but your banked cookies stay (if you didn't spend them all)

i don't actually know if this makes it any more clear, but cookies are tastier than productivity

[Roden]

Ohhh

Ok that makes sense, my bad

[Nero Cain]

[mastina]

Btw Roden is scum here pretty sure.

[Andresvmb]

Btw Roden is scum here pretty sure.

Because they didn’t read carefully enough?

Btw I’m rusty since I haven’t played in 4 months, so bear with me.