They're super opinionated and make a lot of assumptions, they're also pretty clumsy with word choice - Bell
Luke, respect for your scumgame has gone up massively - Hectic
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
In post 359, RCEnigma wrote:From the last 4ish pages, Titus +Town and PP +town. Everyone choosing to engage and re-engage the 4 scum/5 scum discussion tanking. Also hate the Titus vote timings. (As in the votes on Titus not the slot of Titus voting.)
interesting choice for a vanity considering it's on the one guy that called you out
out of interest, do these vibes also apply to furtive? if not, why?
didn't really feel like you had an actual interest in sorting me, felt like you were just checking a box on a list of things you're supposed to be doing in a mafia game. feels a little artificial
which is kinda how ive felt about a lot of your posting so far. it kinda reminds me of how i like to play scum actually, which maybe is why i noticed. it feels like you're playing with the goal of generating townreads on yourself and not with the goal of finding scum
In post 290, Vivax wrote:I don't like Luke's and Fire's harping on mechanics on Page 2, it's dressing up something simple as an overly complex reason to vote Ircher.
I am confused.
What part of my mechanics posting on page 2 was related to Ircher? (outside of my single line question to him)
I mean, I did chide Mastina about stating her productivity, and say other people should not do that. And then, cleared up a misunderstanding that Roden had.
But how or why are you drawing lines between those comments and Ircher? They are completely unrelated in my mind, with no bearing on one another, so like I said. I am confused.
How I draw lines is the subject of many questions, but having a semi-eidetic memory helps.
VOTE: petapan
For weird flails and misjudging vibes and cause by now Ircher seems too obvious to be scum.
Isn't Ircher yume? They wanted to sign up, I probably dumbtelled and they're not even in the game know wtf do I know I had four beers I am now a legitimized anarchist.
@fire
You can see my brain I got it on CD from when I was around 18-20. Can you interpret MRI imaging?
In post 290, Vivax wrote:I don't like Luke's and Fire's harping on mechanics on Page 2, it's dressing up something simple as an overly complex reason to vote Ircher.
I am confused.
What part of my mechanics posting on page 2 was related to Ircher? (outside of my single line question to him)
I mean, I did chide Mastina about stating her productivity, and say other people should not do that. And then, cleared up a misunderstanding that Roden had.
But how or why are you drawing lines between those comments and Ircher? They are completely unrelated in my mind, with no bearing on one another, so like I said. I am confused.
I still believe in the Ircher vote, guilty until proven innocent for me. Can't wait for them to come on and explain.
How I draw lines is the subject of many questions, but having a semi-eidetic memory helps.
VOTE: petapan
For weird flails and misjudging vibes and cause by now Ircher seems too obvious to be scum.
In post 290, Vivax wrote:I don't like Luke's and Fire's harping on mechanics on Page 2, it's dressing up something simple as an overly complex reason to vote Ircher.
I am confused.
What part of my mechanics posting on page 2 was related to Ircher? (outside of my single line question to him)
I mean, I did chide Mastina about stating her productivity, and say other people should not do that. And then, cleared up a misunderstanding that Roden had.
But how or why are you drawing lines between those comments and Ircher? They are completely unrelated in my mind, with no bearing on one another, so like I said. I am confused.
How I draw lines is the subject of many questions, but having a semi-eidetic memory helps.
VOTE: petapan
For weird flails and misjudging vibes and cause by now Ircher seems too obvious to be scum.
My bad, this is what I said: I still believe in the Ircher vote, guilty until proven innocent for me. Can't wait for them to come on and explain.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.