Datisi's Café [game over!]

[fireisredsir]

man i just wanna join someone’s pt

that does sound like a p fun role

[fireisredsir]

so looking back I may have misread that

Yup. It's a complicated role.

I'm off my lunchbreak.

Let's lim Fire today and Luke tomorrow.

p sure he was saying that he misread peta's role and you actually wouldn't even be a miller for him so your "count as one" doesn't even make sense lol

[Titus]

So Titus is claiming she has a role that failed, so nothing happened, but she fumbled 3 times trying to get that out there before landing solidly.

And it appeared to shift as we learned more about the exact way ydras ability worked.

Kinda sad we likely have to kill inside fire/mastina before we can kill her.

You're just desperate to kill me because I know you're scum.

Yes. So desperate you just quoted a post where I said I doubt I am trying to kill you today

You know it's not happening today with an unambiguous 1 v 1.

You've wanted to kill me since I pinned Ircher to the wall and called out your bad Vivax push.

[jjh927]

What fire just said is accurate

[Dannflor]

Mastina doesn’t appear to be claiming a hard guilty in her first post

VOTE: titus

[fireisredsir]

but she's claiming an investigative result and she is literally lying bc i checked her both nights and she hasn't done anything

[Dannflor]

The question should not have been why did roden have so much resistance, but why did Titus have so much resistance

[Dannflor]

Yeah I think it’s somewhat likely mastina could be town and also lying here

[Something_Smart]

Also claim your damn flavor

Not until after I see fireisredsir fullclaim.

That was aimed at Titus, but I'd like to hear yours too. Fire did fullclaim.

[fireisredsir]

isn't mastina's like whole thing that she hates lying about claims

[Ydrasse]

i am so good with using prs

[Klick]

like titus genuinely if all of the stuff ur saying rn is somehow true sorry but lol

This

[mastina]

LOL no you don't, hard counterclaim

im a reddit moderator, i can check if someone carried out a night action. i used it on mastina both nights and both nights she did not carry out an action. i just triple checked my results to make sure

25% + 5% each use

VOTE: mastina

Alright so fullclaim:
I'm a inspection company CEO's nibling, and a

1-shot Cop

.
The cost is 150%. (Do the math--0% productivity on D1 + 50% productivity on D2 = 150% banked for N2.)

I see if someone's aligned with

the inspectors

.

Last night, I targeted fireisredsir, but my N2 Cop Result was

My Action Failed; I got not result

.

Keep in mind:
We have a dead town jailkeeper and a dead town doctor--the town isn't going to have much in the realm of killstop power.
I said that I was going to do a big reveal on D4, not D3, so scum had no reason to roleblock me last night.

I

should

have gotten either a hard innocent or hard guilty--but my action failed. It shouldn't be a town killstop power and scum had no reason to roleblock me.

Ergo, the result indicated to me that fireisredsir had some form of protection his town self shouldn't have. A rolestopper on him, or more likely, an unclaimed ascetic.

Which is why the result was still damning. If he had claimed commuter or ascetic then it'd have been a travesty of town errors, but with him claiming to have tracked me two nights in a row when he explicitly had no reason to do so and not seen me visit either night means he is highly likely to be bullshitting here.

[fireisredsir]

i am so good with using prs

it was a nutty play i love it

[Andresvmb]

Btw just so we’re clear - Titus always dies today. It’s fine if we all want to express a view on mastina and fireisredsir, but we’re not executing between them first. That would be ridiculous.

[Lukewarm]

.........

[Dannflor]

isn't mastina's like whole thing that she hates lying about claims

I thought mastina’s whole thing was lying about claims

[Titus]

So tldr, fire visited mastina. Mastina faked a role. Then real claimed explaining my result.

Can we just lim Luke now mastina? Please.

VOTE: Lukewarm

[jjh927]

Oh boy so Mastina's guilty on Fire is explained by Mastina being roleblocked and Fire's guilty on Mastina is explained by Mastina being roleblocked

[Lukewarm]

Btw just so we’re clear - Titus always dies today. It’s fine if we all want to express a view on mastina and fireisredsir, but we’re not executing between them first. That would be ridiculous.

When mastina was claiming to have a result and fire was claiming to have an investigation result saying she did not act, we were going kill between them.

But mastina just walked that back

VOTE: titus

[fireisredsir]

Which is why the result was still damning. If he had claimed commuter or ascetic then it'd have been a travesty of town errors, but with him claiming to have tracked me two nights in a row when he explicitly had no reason to do so and not seen me visit either night means he is highly likely to be bullshitting here.

why would i not check you lmao you were the only one telegraphing a strong role and i wanted to see if you were legit or not

[Something_Smart]

scum had no reason to roleblock me

who would you have expected them to roleblock?

[Dannflor]

Hm that’s not a guilty

Also fire has every reason to track you

[mastina]

My second thought was he dropped down to 50% to try and stop the bonus kill. Have not looked at any numbers to see if it would make sense for them to get a bonus kill if he was running at 50%

I mean I was running at 50% yesterday, so keep that in the mind.

Didn't you claim you were using 100%?

I ran 0% on D1 to bank 100%, and 50% yesterday to bank 50%.

I could've done 25% on both days, but I figured that 100% into 50% made for a better support of the D4 reveal lie that I was planning. (From the moment I understood the mechanic, I put the "claim that I'll claim on D4" plan into place, but I DO have some--very subtle--crumbs in my iso which tell you that the true reveal was on D3.)

[Klick]

titus is saying that she has a neighborhood but also it goes last because nar but she also doesn’t have it yet but but but

ya this is a fake claim imo

Yeah just claim it all outright at the start

Unless you want to make up stuff to match your claim to info that comes out at a later point