hi, i'm large normal 242. you and i are day 6

[Save The Dragons]

your case is wishy washy, all over the place, and untrue. it feels like you decided i'm scum and are just coming up with more and more reasons to pigeonhole me into this mindset. i think you've confirmbiased yourself and need to reset and actually consider what's been put out vs. decided i'm low content and therefore must be scum.

i don't know why you think i'm dodgy, i don't think i've been dodgy at all. i've given my reads my way and have been pretty clear about them.

most of this post is blustering and not an actual case and i'm not sure what you're hoping to gain from this, it almost seems like you're being dodgy especially since someone asked you a question about me and you get distracted by someone else

Why does this sound like a copypasta?

i don't think it does but what does that even tell you about me? did you read what i said

[MalcolmTucker]

On STD, the big rant against Frogster does deflect a bit...but I feel like STD has typically been much calmer/less confrontational when I've correctly accused them of being scum previously? Or more hedgy at least. It's making me lean more to frustrated town here. Scum want to win sceptic townies over and I don't feel like their responses to Frogster come with that intention.

[MalcolmTucker]

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p13305810

This post the last time (I think?) I played with scum STD feels very different to the more confrontational posts we've seen in response to suspicion. It still deflects and tries to use meta to direct me away from what ended up being an accurate scumread but it's not particularly abrasive or something that's necessarily going to harden my read on a personal level. I'm wary to rely on meta too much of course but not feeling STD scum here.

[Save The Dragons]

i don't really know what to think right now

i at first didn't like MT's catch up because it just seemed like an easy MarieR suspicion. He could be white knighting me but it's hard to want to vote someone who's reading me correctly literally at this very moment

[Toogeloo]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Big Chunga

[Save The Dragons]

i actually don't think BCG is doing nothing, but i'd like to see more from them though

[Toogeloo]

I actually like this vote from Pooky, tbqh.

[Save The Dragons]

are people over mariar

VOTE: MariaR for now

[Save The Dragons]

will you tell us why, toog

[schadd_]

Spoiler:

vote count 1.6 !

Big Chungus Gaming (3):

KittyTacky, PookyTheMagicalBear, Toogeloo

Save The Dragons (3):

Gamma Emerald, Frogsterking, Charloux

MalcolmTucker (2):

MariaR, Big Chungus Gaming

MariaR (2):

Nero Cain, Save The Dragons

Cape90 (1):

SirRhett

Toogeloo (1):

marcistar

Frogsterking (1):

Greeting

Charloux (1):

Cape90

not voting (2):

MalcolmTucker, Fennec

with 16 alive, it takes 9 to blow someone up. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-10-12 15:00:00)

modorator notes

• prodding fennec & sirrhett, who don't seem to have returned after the site outage

[Toogeloo]

Vibez

[KittyTacky]

Honestly I can sheep the case on Dragons, it makes sense to me.

Honestly?

Do better

Scum.

[KittyTacky]

But I prefer BCG today.

[KittyTacky]

MT is townbinned for the catchup posts.

[KittyTacky]

your case is wishy washy, all over the place, and untrue. it feels like you decided i'm scum and are just coming up with more and more reasons to pigeonhole me into this mindset. i think you've confirmbiased yourself and need to reset and actually consider what's been put out vs. decided i'm low content and therefore must be scum.

i don't know why you think i'm dodgy, i don't think i've been dodgy at all. i've given my reads my way and have been pretty clear about them.

most of this post is blustering and not an actual case and i'm not sure what you're hoping to gain from this, it almost seems like you're being dodgy especially since someone asked you a question about me and you get distracted by someone else

Why does this sound like a copypasta?

If it isn't, it should be. It's a bit like a parody of a case rebuttal.

[KittyTacky]

Though

Frog

kinda has a point, the Crescent/

BCG

slot is bad and we might need to just policy elim them.

It isn't a policy if they're legit scummy. If they were just a townie-looking player with a bad playstyle it would be a policy and I oppose that. But it isn't imho.

[KittyTacky]

are people over mariar

VOTE: MariaR for now

Deflection.

[KittyTacky]

SCUM SCUM SCUM SCUM SCUM SCUM

[Charloux]

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Greeting

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Crescent

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Maria

UNVOTE:
VOTE: MalcolmTucker

Malcom sleeps...

I admit my mistake. A true fencesitter should never, under any circumstances offer his opinion and only post fluff. Maybe a naked vote with no reasoning or context?

VOTE: Dragons

Now excuse me, need to eat some enslaved potasium.

This feels like an odd post, like an attempt at humour following a vote/bit of pressure which is actually just an attempt to deflect.

Nice double standard you got there. Is one of Pooky/Toog your scum buddy so you didn't call them out for naked votes? That doesn't make a lot of sense...

OH WAIT

Apart from Gamma; toogeloo, pooky and dragons are viable for me right now.

Well dragons will get replaced prob so not them.

I'm afraid of reading Maria because of ptsd.

I'm not understanding what you think makes Dragons particularly viable here if you expect they're likely to get replaced-out anyway, especially when you basically renege on the point yourself. That would surely be NAI no?

Ah your double standard makes a lot more sense if you are defending your buddy. What a big slip you made. That's 2/4 scum right here.

[marcistar]

who do i vote

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

sheep me

[Save The Dragons]

are people over mariar

VOTE: MariaR for now

Deflection.

See this is a problem. I spent 4 posts talking about me. I'm tired of talking about me it's a distraction but I did it anyway. And you just ignored that fact to call me continuing to play the game a deflection.

You would have dammed me for any vote I made.

I don't know if you are just lazy scum or you need to take a breath but this is bullshit either way

[Big Chungus Gaming]

pooky why did you find crescent suspicious? Can you explain your read there?

No marci, do not sheep pooky, I'm town

I just got home btw reads list incoming.

Full disclosure i havent read most of the game yet.

@std i think ur town but maria is srsly not the play here. Pls consider voting with me here: VOTE: frogster

kitty is prob town here, i think they're grossly wrong, but probably town.

@charloux, consider reading some of STDs recent stuff. Let off the gas. Let the slot breathe. Their reaction is towny. If you are looking for them to do something you gotta let em breathe i get you feel you "got" them but considee that... you dont.

[Cape90]

I admit my mistake. A true fencesitter should never, under any circumstances offer his opinion and only post fluff. Maybe a naked vote with no reasoning or context?

VOTE: Dragons

Now excuse me, need to eat some enslaved potasium.

i don't even know what to say to you

Charloux is scum, don't let Big Chungus fool you

[Cape90]

your case is wishy washy, all over the place, and untrue. it feels like you decided i'm scum and are just coming up with more and more reasons to pigeonhole me into this mindset. i think you've confirmbiased yourself and need to reset and actually consider what's been put out vs. decided i'm low content and therefore must be scum.

i don't know why you think i'm dodgy, i don't think i've been dodgy at all. i've given my reads my way and have been pretty clear about them.

most of this post is blustering and not an actual case and i'm not sure what you're hoping to gain from this, it almost seems like you're being dodgy especially since someone asked you a question about me and you get distracted by someone else

Why does this sound like a copypasta?

If it isn't, it should be. It's a bit like a parody of a case rebuttal.

The whole thing is just
"You say "x" about me when I am not "x"
You accuse me of "y" also when i don't know why you accuse me of "y"
idk ur being dodgy"