Wanna do Pooky? I want to see what happens.In post 1572, MariaR wrote:Back to the pool for me. Goated lists keep it up
pedit: You both could be a villagers tbh I'm not putting that world out.
Pooky is just a wolf but meh
They aren’t voting yet because it’s only been a short time and I would much rather BGCIn post 1575, Titus wrote:Wanna do Pooky? I want to see what happens.In post 1572, MariaR wrote:Back to the pool for me. Goated lists keep it up
pedit: You both could be a villagers tbh I'm not putting that world out.
Pooky is just a wolf but meh
Game is pretty stagnant. People yelling too much, not voting enough.
I need to say more to get BGC and their stances.
Why are you so against me trying to lead coordination?In post 1580, Titus wrote:VOTE: Pooky
And I'd rather get you to stop posting 4-5 times a page so people can coordinate...
Coordinate please...
No one wants to work with you Mathblade because you aren't listening. Everything gets filtered through your worldview and repeated over again. You respond to every conversation interrupting people and blocking reactions. I refused to give reads because it would cause you to post more and I feel like they are shit in this environment.In post 1579, MathBlade wrote:Like this many wagons to avoid BGC only reinforces BGC scum to me
If you're you have no idea what you're doing right nowIn post 1582, MathBlade wrote:Why are you so against me trying to lead coordination?
No one wants to work with me because of you and Frog.In post 1584, Titus wrote:No one wants to work with you Mathblade because you aren't listening. Everything gets filtered through your worldview and repeated over again. You respond to every conversation interrupting people and blocking reactions. I refused to give reads because it would cause you to post more and I feel like they are shit in this environment.In post 1579, MathBlade wrote:Like this many wagons to avoid BGC only reinforces BGC scum to me
I can't tell BCG from Save from Enchant atm.
Case in point.
+1 I have like 95% certainty on Frogsterking town.In post 1585, Frogsterking wrote:If you're you have no idea what you're doing right nowIn post 1582, MathBlade wrote:Why are you so against me trying to lead coordination?
Your actions fit my theory not the other way aroundIn post 1587, Titus wrote:Case in point.
Your Pooky read is dependent on your Frogsterking read. Data isn't changing and you aren't investigating.
You're fitting actions to your theory, which makes everyone eyeroll.
I also legit just said I can’t read Pooky.In post 1587, Titus wrote:Case in point.
Your Pooky read is dependent on your Frogsterking read. Data isn't changing and you aren't investigating.
You're fitting actions to your theory, which makes everyone eyeroll.
They're playing to their scum meta and their D1 votes were poor in hindsightIn post 1591, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.
What specifically is Pooky's scum meta? I find them hard to parse in most games but can't recall having actually played with scum Pooky now I think of it.In post 1592, Frogsterking wrote:They're playing to their scum meta and their D1 votes were poor in hindsightIn post 1591, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.
Lurk early game, power through late gameIn post 1593, MalcolmTucker wrote:What specifically is Pooky's scum meta? I find them hard to parse in most games but can't recall having actually played with scum Pooky now I think of it.In post 1592, Frogsterking wrote:They're playing to their scum meta and their D1 votes were poor in hindsightIn post 1591, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.
Hmmm, maybe notable that Pooky's been quieter this turn than they were D1. Been a few slots that could apply to. My view is you and Math has been TvT and therefore it's likely some scum have been lurking in the background to let that play out since it's useful for them.In post 1595, Frogsterking wrote:Lurk early game, power through late gameIn post 1593, MalcolmTucker wrote:What specifically is Pooky's scum meta? I find them hard to parse in most games but can't recall having actually played with scum Pooky now I think of it.In post 1592, Frogsterking wrote:They're playing to their scum meta and their D1 votes were poor in hindsightIn post 1591, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.
I have reservations about this because FMPOV Math is hitting all the same beats they did in Lost.In post 1596, MalcolmTucker wrote:Been a few slots that could apply to. My view is you and Math has been TvT and therefore it's likely some scum have been lurking in the background to let that play out since it's useful for them.
Lost felt different though because Math was coming into a slot that was already under heavy pressure and they had to work from the beginning to try and get town onto their side. Obviously didn't work out. Not sure Math as scum would have to opt for a similar approach here. Feel like their play so far is closer to how I'm used to them as town, bit more scattergun, ironically not a million miles away from you albeit different styles.In post 1597, Frogsterking wrote:I have reservations about this because FMPOV Math is hitting all the same beats they did in Lost.In post 1596, MalcolmTucker wrote:Been a few slots that could apply to. My view is you and Math has been TvT and therefore it's likely some scum have been lurking in the background to let that play out since it's useful for them.
What do you mean by this?In post 1598, MalcolmTucker wrote:Feel like their play so far is closer to how I'm used to them as town, bit more scattergun, ironically not a million miles away from you albeit different styles.