hi, i'm large normal 242. you and i are day 6

[Cape90]

VOTE: pooky

Oh hell no

I don’t want Pooky anymore

Case in point.

Your Pooky read is dependent on your Frogsterking read. Data isn't changing and you aren't investigating.

You're fitting actions to your theory, which makes everyone eyeroll.

This was definitely correct

[Cape90]

I think Titus does look better actually
Also yes I do acknowledge Titus went back on the Pooky wagon after a while after that, and I do Indeed sign the paper of acknowledgement there

[Enchant]

I will update my list tomorrow, tired now

[Not_Mafia]

Nice

[MathBlade]

Nice

Enjoy conf townieness NM.

Hopefully even though my reads were terrible we can use you + me + Titus (maybe?) and start a townblock

Scum are already at two forced night kills me and you

If we get them up to impossible levels invests will win.

Part of me says we should use our abilities on Titus/vocal people to give scum no quarter and if scum want to shoot Titus it goes to BGC.

I also expect a lot of invest dumping since I wasn’t blocked I doubt a blocker unless they knew the result which tells a lot.

[marcistar]

my results useless

but yes u did visit pooky

[MathBlade]

I guess we should probably use “heal” tags for a secondary vote.

This would be who BGC/NM/me visit tonight as another cop check.

I kinda wanna try for town today to confirm NM doesn’t visit and BCG does.

Anyone wanna go Titus?

She could go mechanically either way. If two town rolecops exist then that’s kinda weird but best to resolve Titus now.

Then she and NM can run the table.

And we also need a confirm visit from BGC to confirm likely loyal.

Like I think Titus BGC (if she has a shot)
Marci BGC (if she has a shot)
NM Titus
Me Titus
BGC Titus

Might just get us a third/fourth townfirm.

NM from the vig
Titus from lack of second death
BGC from visit on my result + Titus rolecop

If BGC is loyal and I see BGC visit Titus and neither are dead
Then BGC + Titus + NM all town

I kinda doubt the loyal claim and I would like to do this if Titus is down as this game would be horribly broken by mass claim.

[Not_Mafia]

I'm just gonna sheep you

[MathBlade]

I'm just gonna sheep you

Mechanically sure

I am still resetting reads

I think the mech plan is sound but as for who is scum

Error 404: MathBlade rebooting

[Big Chungus Gaming]

VOTE: titus

i "visited"

[MathBlade]

VOTE: titus

i "visited"

Why are you voting Titus?

Weren’t you supposed to visit Pooky?

Of whom you didn’t visit?

I am so confused.

[Big Chungus Gaming]

I did visit pooky.

i think you fail to connect the dots of frogster's flip

[Big Chungus Gaming]

i said "visited" because it failed bc i obviously visited an illegal target

[MathBlade]

This you not visiting makes sense because if you are loyal and submitted an action to Pooky and you’re town you never “visit” so I don’t see it.

How does any of that result in a vote on Titus who I am suggesting the same tonight on?

[MathBlade]

I did visit pooky.

i think you fail to connect the dots of frogster's flip

Connect them for me?

[Big Chungus Gaming]

pooky claimed that frogster was clear somehow off an investigative action that pooky supposedly confirmed.

titus was claiming an action that implied frogster was 100% clear

there are too many investigatives here + i think the whole claim was suspicious around it

[Big Chungus Gaming]

well u better hope im not 1 shot, even night, or roleblocked tonight if u wanna do ur plan

[Titus]

pooky claimed that frogster was clear somehow off an investigative action that pooky supposedly confirmed.

titus was claiming an action that implied frogster was 100% clear

there are too many investigatives here + i think the whole claim was suspicious around it

This is incorrect. I visited MalcolmTucker n1. He's vanilla. I did get a result n2.

[MathBlade]

pooky claimed that frogster was clear somehow off an investigative action that pooky supposedly confirmed.

titus was claiming an action that implied frogster was 100% clear

there are too many investigatives here + i think the whole claim was suspicious around it

I think that mechanically Titus is suspicious because dual role cop.

But by play she really isn’t.

So by you me and NM doing the mass visit again if Titus is scum we aren’t spending pages and pages with Titus to sort her. We just use mech to do it.

If she’s town she won’t die and you won’t die

It’s the same thing as the Pooky plan.

Then we will know her rolecops are legit or not

I agree this level of invests is sus.

But scum killed Frogger over breaking up this conf town chain for a reason.

It’s either to sus Titus or protect her I think.

[MathBlade]

well u better hope im not 1 shot, even night, or roleblocked tonight if u wanna do ur plan

If you were those things you’d say so as to not waste the coordination.

So are you?

Should we just be aiming for scum?

I figured you’d love a townfirm.

[Big Chungus Gaming]

pooky claimed that frogster was clear somehow off an investigative action that pooky supposedly confirmed.

titus was claiming an action that implied frogster was 100% clear

there are too many investigatives here + i think the whole claim was suspicious around it

This is incorrect. I visited MalcolmTucker n1. He's vanilla. I did get a result n2.

you assumed i was clear because of frogster. this is incongruent.

[Big Chungus Gaming]

well u better hope im not 1 shot, even night, or roleblocked tonight if u wanna do ur plan

If you were those things you’d say so as to not waste the coordination.

So are you?

Should we just be aiming for scum?

I figured you’d love a townfirm.

idk if i want to to force scum to play around it

[MathBlade]

well u better hope im not 1 shot, even night, or roleblocked tonight if u wanna do ur plan

If you were those things you’d say so as to not waste the coordination.

So are you?

Should we just be aiming for scum?

I figured you’d love a townfirm.

idk if i want to to force scum to play around it

?? Elaborate please

You don’t want to force scum to have to have less options?

I don’t follow

[Big Chungus Gaming]

mech wifom (:

[MathBlade]

pooky claimed that frogster was clear somehow off an investigative action that pooky supposedly confirmed.

titus was claiming an action that implied frogster was 100% clear

there are too many investigatives here + i think the whole claim was suspicious around it

This is incorrect. I visited MalcolmTucker n1. He's vanilla. I did get a result n2.

Awesome. Are you gonna share or holding until midday?