Much inconsistentIn post 2897, MalcolmTucker wrote:Your vote on me here doesn't feel particularly consistent with some of your posts from before? Feels a bit opportunistic, like you're realising I could be a convenient elimination to take some heat away from your slot which was under pressure before STD dropped out.
Such opportunistic
Spoiler:
Like you were in my scum pile, and then when I looked at my scum pile, I saw that my town reads were interested in BCG (NM) and you (Marci), so was willing to back either option to progress the game.
My other town reads shot down BCG (Toog and MB)
So here we are.
----
You were in my scum pile because when I read part of Day 2, your defense when Frog called out your bcg's town logic, your response was "but are we partnered" and when Marci called out your MariaR read, your response was "but what about my STD read."
Both defenses feel like they make more sense coming from a point of view of "but what about these other, unrelated things that I did that I thought would make people think that I was town" instead of "oh, you think me doing this is scummy, well you are wrong because I did it / thought it and am town."
-----
ngl, you calling it inconsistent without backing it up at all, sure doesn't make me think you are less likely to be scum, because this just seems like shade for the sake of shade.
