Mini 2284: The Thing Anonymous [Day 2]
Forum rules
- Blair~
-
Blair~ Townie
- Blair~
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 60
- Joined: November 2, 2022
in a normal game, you can bus for towncred and get towncred to endgame because really good bussing makes people look very town - that's the incentive to bus your teammate in a normal game
in this game - we are re-evaluating every slot every day because alignments can change so that bus credit doesn't do you any good - it's not like you can bus your teammate on day one and coast for a few days.- MacReady~
-
MacReady~
- Blair~
-
Blair~ Townie
- Blair~
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 60
- Joined: November 2, 2022
yea but his later posts are decent so I don't think he would decide to gimmick open with a really weird reason to scumread me.In post 374, MacReady~ wrote:
And I guess, I think it's actually something scum might latch onto though, for lack of anything betterIn post 372, Blair~ wrote:
I thought his "reasoning" for thinking I am mafia is too stupid for a mafia player to make up.In post 370, MacReady~ wrote:Why do you think Windows is townie?- Norris~
-
Norris~ Townie
- Norris~
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 53
- Joined: November 2, 2022
Oh yeah I did read it in scumchat, my bad thanks for letting me know.In post 369, Blair~ wrote:Thinking more about Norris trolling and refusing to answer the question about which post made him think Clark is a Newb and not having an answer I feel like it might be somewhat more susp as if they had read it somewhere else like in the Mafia PT and subconsciously put it into their head then they might have slipped so it's not just trolling but possibly covering up a slip. I am fine with voting there if we want that- Norris~
-
Norris~ Townie
- Norris~
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 53
- Joined: November 2, 2022
- MacReady~
-
MacReady~ Goon
- MacReady~
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 104
- Joined: November 2, 2022
- Fuchs~
-
Fuchs~ Goon
- Fuchs~
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 127
- Joined: November 2, 2022
I don't think I understand what you are saying here?In post 166, Nauls~ wrote:Odds of Fuchs/Norris scum and that one part of 116 made about my intro was some sort of chainsaw defense? Or maybe the "where to vote thing" is too genuine to come from that team. Both of them looks iffy to me regardless.
You think that my comment about Palmer was a chainsaw defense of Norris?
I am not calling you scum here, I am vaguely leaning town on you. I was calling Palmer's reasoning non-genuine looking, like he was looking for a way to make an alignment based statement about you vs seeing something that he actually thought was alignment indicative, and that then influencing his read. I feel like I have reworded my point a few times, but am struggling to get people to actually understand my point about Palmer's post (including Palmer lol)
Just to add, this self referential nature of viewing the game does leans me more to you being town.- Fuchs~
-
Fuchs~ Goon
- Fuchs~
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 127
- Joined: November 2, 2022
I town read Lars's posts about Norris here for the exact reasons that you scum read them lmao.In post 201, Palmer~ wrote:I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that Lars' treatment of Norris isworsethan Copper's is, assuming Norris is town. Copper's vote is naked and unexplained, sure. But reading through Lars' posts on the bottom of page 7 and top of page 8, they give off this aura of Lars trying really hard to appear superior to Norris. It doesn't read like he's actually interrogating Norris, it reads like he's trying to show to the rest of us how unreasonable and scummy Norris is.
I also think Norris is a type of player that is easier to read if he's allowed to do his own thing, rather than if he gets jumped on early. Which is an additional point that gives me the chills about Lars here.
Lars is putting in work on it, cross checking the tone of his recent posts vs how he presented prior, and putting himself in the forefront of the push by being the strongest, loudest, most detailed pusher. This is not where scum want to be on a town!Norris wagon.
It is early Day 1, and Norris is doing a decent job of making himself look bad. No need for scum to go this hard right there, so this looks more to me like town!Lars genuinely believing in his case.- Fuchs~
-
Fuchs~ Goon
- Fuchs~
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 127
- Joined: November 2, 2022
In post 281, Windows~ wrote:
Copper went from "mostly a gutread" to "this kind of behaviour is really scummy" in literally 2 minutes, you don't see a contradiction there?
Cooper tries to justify this but I don't buy it:
You finished the backread in the 2 minutes between those posts?In post 255, Copper~ wrote: I had not quite finished my backread when responding to Bennings, Norris started getting really trolly on page 8 which I didn't read during the "sheeping" comment, the "trolling" comment came after I read everything.
And the "we're not even on page 10" sounds like you were caught up:
"I forgot to mention the scumminess of the posting style" is an explanation I could have bought but "I was still rereading" I don't think fits with that timeline.In post 206, Copper~ wrote:
I think windows is town for this post
Opportunistic how? It's mostly a gutread but we're not even on page 10.- Fuchs~
-
Fuchs~ Goon
- Fuchs~
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 127
- Joined: November 2, 2022
ebwopIn post 383, Fuchs~ wrote:
I think windows is town for this postIn post 281, Windows~ wrote:
Copper went from "mostly a gutread" to "this kind of behaviour is really scummy" in literally 2 minutes, you don't see a contradiction there?
Cooper tries to justify this but I don't buy it:
You finished the backread in the 2 minutes between those posts?In post 255, Copper~ wrote: I had not quite finished my backread when responding to Bennings, Norris started getting really trolly on page 8 which I didn't read during the "sheeping" comment, the "trolling" comment came after I read everything.
And the "we're not even on page 10" sounds like you were caught up:
"I forgot to mention the scumminess of the posting style" is an explanation I could have bought but "I was still rereading" I don't think fits with that timeline.In post 206, Copper~ wrote:
I think windows is town for this post
Opportunistic how? It's mostly a gutread but we're not even on page 10.
Put my comment in the middle of the quote lol- Fuchs~
-
Fuchs~ Goon
- Fuchs~
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 127
- Joined: November 2, 2022
Oh look, it meIn post 335, Norris~ wrote:Wheres Fuchs at though?- Blair~
-
Blair~ Townie
- Blair~
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 60
- Joined: November 2, 2022
In post 379, Norris~ wrote:Like literally Blair can you try shutting up
You must like my trolling huh? I've already said I'll stop trolling if we move topic but you're trying to bring it back...
at some point people will get annoyed enough by your shit to kill you just to shut you up- Fuchs~
-
Fuchs~ Goon
- Fuchs~
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 127
- Joined: November 2, 2022
This feels like really bad reasoning, but Norris putting his entire point inside a spoiler inside a quote makes me want to call him town again. At least back up to nullIn post 349, Norris~ wrote:
u can try opening fhe quote in the post ur looking at and opening the spoiler and read the italics i added on.. please?In post 347, Bennings~ wrote:
so what separates childs from the rest?In post 317, Norris~ wrote:I don't like everyone pushing me, but I don't complain about every single one of them.- Fuchs~
-
Fuchs~ Goon
- Fuchs~
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 127
- Joined: November 2, 2022
In post 317, Norris~ wrote:
I don't like everyone pushing me, but I don't complain about every single one of them.In post 316, MacReady~ wrote:You don't seem to like Childs pushing you so I wouldn't expect you to
But.. whateverIn post 311, MacReady~ wrote:Spoiler:
Pages 11 and 12 actually
I feel like his approach to your slot, particularly from these posts are unlikely to come from scum - he feels truly annoyed at the situation, is not pushing a policy lim, and is trying to understand Norris's behavior in an AI context. The cumulative effect feels townie to me, doesn't feel like a policy lim from scum- Blair~
-
Blair~ Townie
- Blair~
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 60
- Joined: November 2, 2022
I am not trying to bring up your shit
I have not asked you a question. I frankly don't give a fuck about your shit trolling. If it's disruptive enough to the game I'm happy to incinerate you because it annoys me.
I'm expressing my view on voting you. You don't have to respond to that by being a douchebag unless you really want to goad me into voting you for some reason because you believe getting yourself killed would somehow make you happy or whatever.- Fuchs~
-
Fuchs~ Goon
- Fuchs~
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 127
- Joined: November 2, 2022
Wow, managed to put my comment in the wrong place twice. Oh how I have goofed this nightIn post 388, Fuchs~ wrote:
And actually reading this, I kinda like the content of the post.In post 317, Norris~ wrote:
I don't like everyone pushing me, but I don't complain about every single one of them.In post 316, MacReady~ wrote:You don't seem to like Childs pushing you so I wouldn't expect you to
But.. whateverIn post 311, MacReady~ wrote:Spoiler:
Pages 11 and 12 actually
I feel like his approach to your slot, particularly from these posts are unlikely to come from scum - he feels truly annoyed at the situation, is not pushing a policy lim, and is trying to understand Norris's behavior in an AI context. The cumulative effect feels townie to me, doesn't feel like a policy lim from scum- Fuchs~
-
Fuchs~ Goon
- Fuchs~
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 127
- Joined: November 2, 2022
In post 356, Palmer~ wrote:If you read my posts, you will notice that I don't scumread any of the three wagons! And I DO scumread multiple people voting for those wagons!
In addition to that, I do not care about baseless VCA!
Not liking the wagons in part because you scum read multiple people voting on those wagons feels pretty contradictory to coming back and arguing that maybe scum does not feel the need to push any of the wagons since they are all town.In post 362, Palmer~ wrote:Or maybe these are three town wagons and the things don't give two shits about pushing town wagons when there's no threat for them. But I dunno.- Fuchs~
-
Fuchs~ Goon
- Fuchs~
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 127
- Joined: November 2, 2022
I think that Blair, Lars, Nails, Copper, Windows, Norris and MacReady are all town of varying degrees of strength
I have had conflicting thoughts on Childs, so he is in: I don't know where these balance out, so I'll call it Null Tier.
I have had 0 retained thoughts on Garry or Bennings, so they are in null:scum.
Palmer and Clark in the scum pile- Fuchs~
-
Fuchs~ Goon
- Fuchs~
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 127
- Joined: November 2, 2022
- Lars~
-
Lars~ Townie
- Lars~
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 54
- Joined: November 2, 2022
I think you're still misinterpreting here, he's saying that the virtue signaling is about choosing not to E-1 someone. It's reasonable to see that as a bit performative.In post 368, Blair~ wrote:actually on second thought I don't think it's that relevant because it could just be about E-1ing in general and not about Clark's alignment in this particular game.- Lars~
-
Lars~ Townie
- Lars~
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 54
- Joined: November 2, 2022
thanks for pointing this out. I had completely missed the spoilered comments (and didn't understand what the comment referencing it was talking about) until now.In post 387, Fuchs~ wrote:
This feels like really bad reasoning, but Norris putting his entire point inside a spoiler inside a quote makes me want to call him town again. At least back up to nullIn post 349, Norris~ wrote:
u can try opening fhe quote in the post ur looking at and opening the spoiler and read the italics i added on.. please?In post 347, Bennings~ wrote:
so what separates childs from the rest?In post 317, Norris~ wrote:I don't like everyone pushing me, but I don't complain about every single one of them.
points to you for making this clear and points to Norris for the comments themselves, which I think are good
VOTE: Clark- Lars~
-
Lars~ Townie
- Lars~
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 54
- Joined: November 2, 2022
- Copper~
-
Copper~ Townie
- Copper~
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 52
- Joined: November 2, 2022
Doesn't seem like genuine LHF town and more like scum trolling to look like LHF. Subtle difference.In post 343, Bennings~ wrote:
Yeah I'm getting LHF vibesIn post 248, Nauls~ wrote:Honestly I’m not the biggest fan of the votes that have piled onto Norris, but Norris also hasn’t given me any reason to feel any better about them than before.- Copper~
-
Copper~ Townie
- Copper~
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 52
- Joined: November 2, 2022
Possible but I'm like 95% sure there is at least one scum between those 3 wagons. imo it's Norris.In post 362, Palmer~ wrote:Or maybe these are three town wagons and the things don't give two shits about pushing town wagons when there's no threat for them. But I dunno.- Copper~
-
Copper~ Townie
- Copper~
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 52
- Joined: November 2, 2022
Elaborate.In post 384, Fuchs~ wrote:
ebwopIn post 383, Fuchs~ wrote:
I think windows is town for this postIn post 281, Windows~ wrote:
Copper went from "mostly a gutread" to "this kind of behaviour is really scummy" in literally 2 minutes, you don't see a contradiction there?
Cooper tries to justify this but I don't buy it:
You finished the backread in the 2 minutes between those posts?In post 255, Copper~ wrote: I had not quite finished my backread when responding to Bennings, Norris started getting really trolly on page 8 which I didn't read during the "sheeping" comment, the "trolling" comment came after I read everything.
And the "we're not even on page 10" sounds like you were caught up:
"I forgot to mention the scumminess of the posting style" is an explanation I could have bought but "I was still rereading" I don't think fits with that timeline.In post 206, Copper~ wrote:
I think windows is town for this post
Opportunistic how? It's mostly a gutread but we're not even on page 10.
Put my comment in the middle of the quote lol - Copper~
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Copper~
- Copper~
- Lars~
- Lars~
- Lars~
- Fuchs~
- Fuchs~
- Fuchs~
- Fuchs~
- Blair~
- Fuchs~
- Fuchs~
- Blair~
- Fuchs~
- Fuchs~
- Fuchs~
- Fuchs~
- Fuchs~
- MacReady~
- Norris~
- Norris~
- Blair~
- Blair~