In post 596, Garry~ wrote:I don't really like the plan of childs.
As said by Mac, novice vig doesn't imply town!Clark.
Yes it does, because Jailkeeper and Vigilante are meant to be paired together.
And, let me drop this bombshell:
WHAT MAKES CLARK LOOK LIKE SCUM TO YOU?
Serious question.
Would it be a lack of content?
Would it be the content being posted being scummy?
Both?
The claim into the above? The above into claim?
All valid, but follow along with me, here, that is important.
So you think BY PLAY that Clark is scum, yes???
Alrighty then.
Let's work with that!
WHAT'S THE WORST-CASE SCENARIO IF WE ELIMINATE A TOWN-CLARK?
We lose a Jailkeeper and me, with no scum dead and the two strongest TPRs dead before D2.
Alright, so let's cover the inverse, then!
WHAT'S THE WORST-CASE SCENARIO IF WE LET A SCUM-CLARK LIVE D1?
You've already given the answer to this repeatedly, the stupidly obvious,
Clark hops to a new body.
Okay but here's the most important part and why this fear mongering is fucking stupidity incarnated:
WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THAT ON D2 IN THE DISGUISED PLAYER'S BODY, CLARK WILL SOMEHOW MAGICALLY IMPROVE IN PLAY AS SCUM?
Clark is scummy as fuck by play, enough to get run up today.
Even if he's scum, that trait ain't magically going to disappear overnight from possessing a new body.
The scumminess of his content would still be there--just in a different body.
So, what's the risk?
Clark's scummy enough to be wagoner right now, he's scummy enough to be wagoner on whoever he'd hop to if he's scum.