In post 3525, Mistyx wrote: In post 3521, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:
I'M TAKING THIS THREAD FLAKE AS A SIGN THAT NO; NO YOU CAN NOT LINK TO WHERE YOU HAVE SEEN THIS SHIT BEFORE.
i'm not really interested in engaging with you if this is how you're going to be jumping to things
you're correct that i can't, i don't have the best memory for specific games
In post 3526, Mistyx wrote:VOTE: SCRRRDBEAR
this isnt a salt vote at least as far as i can tell - i just think comparing his handling of me now compared to earlier it comes off as generally kind of manipulative, and that's not the first time i've noticed this game
i think theres issues with his posts, i'll bring them up when i'm in a mood where i'm more willing to play
In post 2226, Mistyx wrote:
i mean i dont like how much of a fuss he's been making about catching up and then posts a completely unexplained readlist
In post 2288, Mistyx wrote:asks for people to engage with him answers a softball complains about being shaded then dips instead of answering actual questions
this can die
THIS IS FUN: KEEP THE ABOVE FROM MISTYX IN MIND WHEN READING THE BELOW.
In post 3241, Mistyx wrote: In post 3237, SCRRRDBEAR wrote:
THE MAIN CONTENTION WAS WHETHER I WAS OVERTHINKING YOUR SLOT OR THEY WERE UNDERTHINKING IT. I AGREED WITH WHAT THEY SAID BUT PROPOSED YOU WERE BEING SETUP AS A VIABLE MISLIM, FOR EXAMPLE, T3 END OF DAY BEHAVIOR BEING INTENDED TO FRAME YOU BY LOOKING LIKE A SHITTY DISTANCING ATTEMPT. IT WOULD HELP ME IF YOU EXPLAINED YOUR READ TRAJECTORIES D2.
my short term memory sucks
which ones specifically
In post 3516, Mistyx wrote:i mean most of the stuff i have to scumread him i already mentioned not much has changed since then
i think the "scum ss would talk more about T3 in order to get actual cred" argument has some merit but not as much as he's acting like it does
SO AFTER EVADING EXPLAINING ANYTHING TO ME FOR AS LONG AS POSSIBLE, I HAVE TO GO DIG THROUGH YOUR ISO TO FIND THE TWO POSTS WHERE YOU SAY ANYTHING ABOUT
WHY
YOU EVER THOUGHT SS IS SCUM IN THE FIRST PLACE. BY THE WAY, IT'S CALLED "WORKING MEMORY" MISTYX AND IT'S A SCUM TELL CALLED THE NSG TELL.
ANYWAY, I CAN NOW PRESENT YOUR 2 SS POSTS FOR ALL TO SEE:
In post 2726, Mistyx wrote:VOTE: Something_Smart
feel like this is a hit btw
Y to eat breakfast
GREAT STUFF. YOU HAVE TO GO EAT BREAKFAST. TOO BAD THAT DIDN'T HELP WITH YOUR "SHORT TERM MEMORY"
NOW THERE IS ONLY ONE POST WHERE YOU SAY ANYTHING ABOUT YOUR READ ON SS.
In post 2744, Mistyx wrote:
you're flying under the radar
this isnt indicative of anything on its own but i think you're doing that on purpose
townread kitty in 1444 then start pushing him in 1818 / 1831 / start of d2
i don't think you have conviction in your reads and are just posting stuff to not get pushed
#1 SS IS FLYING UNDER THE RADAR
...BUT APPARENTLY YOU ALSO THINK THAT'S NOT INDICATIVE OF ANYTHING. OKAY. YOU JUST THINK HE'S DOING IT ON PURPOSE.
#1 SS CHANGING HIS READ ON KITTY OVER THE SPAN OF ~400 POSTS, BETWEEN
1444 AND THEN
1818 /
1832 /
START OF D2
IS WHY YOU SUSPECT SS IS SCUM.
#2 YOU DON'T THINK SS HAS CONVICTION IN HIS READS AND
#3 HE IS JUST POSTING STUFF NOT TO GET PUSHED
==========
OKAY GREAT. THANKS FOR WASTING MY TIME PULLING ALL THAT UP.
YOUR EXPLANATION #1 IS HORSESHIT END OF STORY. SS READ CHANGING OVER THE COURSE OF A NIGHT A PHASE AND ~400 POSTS IS NOT SUSPICIOUS.
NOW, CAN YOU QUOTE THE POSTS OR INDICATE THE ABSENCE OF WORDS/POSTS WHERE YOU THINK SS WAS HOLDING BACK WHICH CAUSED YOU TO FORM YOUR OPINIONS #2 AND #3?
TO BE EXPLICITLY CLEAR, I WANT TO KNOW WHY YOU THINK #2 SS DOESN'T HAVE CONVICTION IN HIS READS AND #3 WHY YOU THINK SS IS JUST POSTING STUFF NOT TO GET PUSHED.