This commentary starts with day 2. If you all want to know who I found most scummiest day 1, the answer is Pops. But one of the claimed cops says Pops is innocent so I will leave my comments about Pops for some other time aka when we know which of the cops is lying.
First of all, can the YE voters of day 1 tell me why they voted YE.
Cap wrote:I was considering YE to be scum
Why?
Cap wrote:I am inclined to believe both scum were on YE's wagon
That's easy for you to say as you weren't on it.
Cap wrote:I feel pops is town
Gut? If so, any quotes of which you get this feeling?
Pops wrote:I got back home just at the beginning of night 1. I was pretty unhappy to see that moratorium had dropped the hammer. I totally didn't feel it was time to hammer yet. If i was here when Eric had dropped into L-1, i would have withdrawn my vote, but i didn't get back so i couldn't.
Don't like this. Of course, he could mean it, but he could also try to win some townie points with this.
Pops wrote:Voting for someone you don't think is most suspicious
This happens quite often actually.
Moratorium, can you explain me why you chose Barros, instead of Pops as Pops was one of your number two suspects day 1.
Cap wrote:I believe Moratorium fully, who do you think is the other scum?
Don't like this as Cap voted Moratorium immediatly at the start of day 2.
Caps wrote:Well, the prime suspect right now would be guy0.
Or we could look into you
. But tell me why you think that both scum were on the wagon of YE?
Pops wrote:I don't fully buy his claim. But based off the numbers, I don't think it really matters if we buy or not.
It doesn't
?!
Wrong lynch gives us 2 scum no cop.
Good lynch gives us 1 scum and 1 cop.
Why does it not matter to you?
Pops wrote:What if vote around at the remaining players for scum?
I like this idea. We lynch you and with that we can perhaps clear Barros
Pops wrote:Whoever the doctor is, make sure you protect Moratorium tonight if he is not lynched. It doesn't matter if he might be lying, protect him.
Any reason that you don't think about the chance that there's no doc?
Moratorium wrote:I'm not going to answer this question today, it gives scum too much information.
But it also gives NO information to the town. Even if you don't tell us, you'll hurt us.
Pops wrote:But then Barros asks "Why so nervous?".
He never did!
Pops wrote:I think he was projecting, espionage and deception was on his mind because he is scum.
Sure. *Note my sarcastic look on my face right now*
Pops wrote:I didn't want to point this out for a while because it's Freudian, reachy, and we haven't been on the topic off Barros much, but i figured now was as good a time as any to point that out.
You thought he was scummy, but you didn't want to point it out until someone else gives a comment about Barros being scummy. Don't like this. I think it's called 'joining the crowd'.
Pops wrote:This suspicious bit form Barros is part of why I am leaning towards Moratorium being clean.
Okay *Note my surprised expression*
Pops wrote:I have a bit of concern about guy0,...
Yes, he scumhunts. Oh wait, didn't Cap just said something about Guy0 being scummy?
Many players do such thing. But you could have asked him about it, instead of making it an attack immediatly.
Pops wrote:I'd say that sounds pretty legit, considering Moratorium is going to investigate his pick for next scum.
If there's a roleblocker, do you think the roleblocker won't pick the claimed cop?
Pops wrote:If scum claims cop
Why did you only mention scum as claimer, while Moratorium could have lied about his claim?
Pops wrote:Based on his post history, I do really think he'd be a good lynch.
Was this based due to the insect dialogue or other posts as well?
Pops post 172 wrote:However, if we lynch him, we don't "get all the information we need". We get all the information we need to get to a 2 town 1 scum final day. That could be tough, especially since this fake claim would only be made if you had a pretty clean scum partner..... of course, i could use that expectation to find the final scum anyway. I'm leaning towards a Barros lynch more and more.
Can you rephrase this? I don't understand one bit of it
Moratorium, after Barros claimed he immediatly voted you. Why didn't you vote him in your first post of day 2, while 'your result' said he is scum?
Cap wrote:Many thanks for your input, Barros, you may curl up and die now.
Unvote, Revote Barros
No thoughts about him actually being the cop. Why is that?
Pops wrote:ANY DOCTOR should protect Moratorium if Barros flips roleblocker.
ANY DOCTOR should protect whoever they think is a good target if Barros flips goon.
Any reason why there's no part of: 'ANY DOC should protect ... if Moratorium flips...'?
Pops wrote:The way he claimed didn't sound totally clean, and a counter cop claim is infinitely suspicious.
You know, explanations aren't forbidden
.
Pops wrote:But, I'm inclined to believe him because i know the investigation he gave is right
I'm sure that if he is scum and you're not, he would also know you're townie.
Besides, scum would also say that they're townie.
Pops wrote:might be part of Moratorium's "master plan".
And saying this could be part of Pops's 'master plan'.
Pops wrote:If i was chosen as a scapegoat, i would probably have defended myself better.
We'll probably never know.
pops wrote:We could always call a mass claim to decide what setup we're in.
Right. I'm sure the doc will call himself out and I'm positive that the roleblocker will also get out of his shell
What's the use of this?
Pops wrote:I think Barros might even be vanilla townie.
If he is, he should have had no reason to lie about his cop claim.
Guy0 wrote:who were precisely who I was waiting for
Why did you want to wait?
Also I just saw this in Guy0's post:
Barros wrote:I dont beg the doc to protect me.
Are you that certain about a doc being in this game?
Pops wrote:I'd given Barros an FoS, I'd have backed you up.
Based on what would you have FoSed Barros?
I must say, post 193 is ... great.
I didn't like Cap's reactions towards the cop claims, but he's right. Moratorium as scum wouldn't have a good reason to claim right now as many players were already suspecting Barros. And 'sane' isn't mentioned.
So if that was a trap of Moratorium, it was a good one.
Post 195, is bad.
Especially the part about bullcharging Barros to gain townie points. Especially as I see you and Barros as scum duo.
Moratorium wrote:Barros flipped guilty, not scum. In Barros' counterclaim, he specified that pops flipped "not scum", which is not what the cop role reveals.
I haven't been cop yet (well one time. But that was in a game of Tar, so it doesn't count) so i don't know which answer you get. Sorry for not being able to help you in this case.
Barros wrote:Ok, all i got to say is: I really don't know what to do more, or you kill moratorium or you kill me, but, in the end, both will end up lynched...
We just got to wait that the one who is killed is scum.
Well, uhm, if you talk you can show us if you're a townie or not. And if you're a townie you would want us to see that you're a townie so that not both of you get lynched, but only the scum.
So, uhm, you know that you're hurting the town by not posting, right?
Pops wrote:Prum prum, by the by, if Barros did actually come up cop, somehow, the doctor should protect me. Saving an innocent is better than saving an unknown, having innocents in the game decreases like, the uncertainty and stuff. I don't know, the doctor started saving the innocent in a game i read.
How many :shock:s are allowed as I don't think one
is enough to show how
ed I am about this
ing post?
Cupcake Pops
Barros wrote:Moratorium is killed and turns out to be a cop. Then i'm killed even if i'm town.
Is this even possible?
Barros wrote:Moratorium is killed and turns out to be town. Maybe, i'm not killed.
Why would Moratorium lie if he's town?
Barros wrote:Moratorium is killed and turns out to be scum. I'm not killed.
You sure
?
Barros wrote:I'm killed and turn out to be scum. Moratorium is not killed.
You sure
?
Moratorium wrote:I want your opinion on the Cop claim/counterclaim central to this game at the moment.
I think I've answered this question in this post already. Short summary: I see Moratorium as cop more than Barros as cop.
Cap wrote:Scum just do not play like that
But as scum expect town to think this, they will.
But now that this is brought up, they won't.
But this will continue for some time, so they will.
Want me to continue?
Goomba, the question was 'who do you see as scummier of the claimed cops'?
Not, 'who should we lynch first'?
Post 249.
Yes, Pops looks for the real cop and discuss about them. Oh wait, Goomba just talked about Moratorium being scum. Are you going with both sides, Pops?
I agree with the points Moratorium brought up because of Goomba's post in post 250.
Yeah for post 251.
Guy0 wrote:I think he meant the whole appeal to emotion thing with the doc, and by saying "oh doc, please save me" you are gaining crowd support.
But when it seems logical to me that if you're a cop you want to survive. If the roleblocker is gone, you can still help town with your role.
Goomba wrote:he just seemed to randomly choose Barros for his investigation.
He didn't. He has said why he had chosen Barros. Why do you see that as random?
Goomba wrote:but his backing of Moratorium by wrapping it in a wall of math-based logic all of a sudden makes me think maybe Capricious and Moratorium are in cahoots.
And I think the scum are Pops and Barros. We're quite the good scumhunters together
.
Barros wrote:Since the beginning of this day (at least) capricious always, ALWAYS, agreeed with moratorium.
Such things will always happen. In my completed NG, the two IC's were agreeing with eachother the whole time. Neither turned up scum. And in a NG the last scum agreed the whole time with a townie player.
Agreeing with eachother doesn't make someone scum.
Pops wrote:and until i'm done asking that sub questions
Do you have questions?
Pops wrote:Jerseygoomba, do you think i'm town or scum?
Why do you want to know this?
Pops wrote:he thinks i'm innocent, which is a good thing,
Again a
ery comment. I want you to know how
ed I am by this
ing comment. What does this have to do with anything?
Pops wrote:I've gone over everyone in the game so far but myself i think, and i would definitely say not to investigate me.
, I'm even more
ed than I was
ed at the previous comment.
. I've got nothing else to say than
Moratorium wrote:I'd like to hear who everyone thinks I should investigate next, should I survive both D2 and N2.
Based upon my
s, I vote for a pops investigation.
Pops wrote:"sure you can investigate me, i'm innocent". That's a waste of time and provides him no info.
But saying "i would definitely say not to investigate me." does?
So saying "you may investigate me" is more suspicious than "don't investigate me" because?
Pops wrote:I've already pointed out I thought his tunnel vision reading of the thread was suspicious.
Tunnel vision is bad. Joining the crowd is also bad. The question is, which is worse?
Pops post 276 wrote:he is legit.
You know this, how?
Pops, why do you see Goomba as Barros partner if Barros flips scum?
Goomba wrote:The more you stick up for Moratorium, the more I'm beginning to think YOU are HIS scum partner.
Almost the same suspicions as I have
.
Enjoy
!
Post 299.
I don't like it when other players 'answer'. It was asked to Moratorium. Not to Pops.
I've seen some points now against Moratorium's choice of investigation. To me, he did it correctly. Pops would have been next.
This will be an 'if' situation.
What if you were the cop and you decided to investigate the most scummiest player. At day 2, all the other players start attacking the player you investigated. (We assume that it was a not guilty/ not scum result). You as cop now needs to defend him. If you fail, you have lost your extra information. If it comes so far that you need to claim, then the town will probably lose their power role. Both aren't good for town. There's the possibility that you will succeed, but try to do that, while everyone attacks your investigated player.
Moratorium wrote:Lynch Barros. If he flips town, lynch me.
If you're the cop, you should know he won't.
Moratorium wrote:Don't be in such a hurry to lynch, we have plenty of time so lets use it to our advantage. It can only help the town to have more time to discuss, and have more statements to analyze.
If Moratorium is the cop, I agree with him saying that. There are some players now who are looking negatively at him only because they want to discuss more. If this continues, it could mean a Moratorium lynch. If a quick-lynch will prevent this, then I would also go for a quick-lynch.
But this also goes for him being scum.
Guy0 wrote:I feel like we should lynch him just because of his inactivity
Not a
ery post like Pops, but still a
ery post.
Guy0 wrote:so pops chatterboxyness, which could either be town or scum would have been confirmed.
You should be happy. We have found scum. I don't understand why you're still whining about Moratorium's reason to investigate Barros.
Guy0 wrote:Moratorium investigates pops and gets innocent result: This would have been a very informative investigation result, as it would have allowed you to steer the town towards not voting pops, and towards another, since you and pops were now clean, there would be 2 scum and 3 town to choose from, which, combined with reasoning would be easier.
What would you have done if Moratorium starts defending Pops from out of the blue? Would you have thought Moratorium was a townie without his claim?
Guy0 wrote:Moratroium investigates Barros and gets innocent result: This result would provide ABSOLUTELY NO RELEVANT INFORMATION FOR DAY 2
True. NOT FOR DAY 2. But for later days it would have been. It's not all about day 2 you know. Stop being a drama queen. That's my job.
Guy0 wrote:So you "should" have thought (i use quotes because technically we are not 100% of your copiness), when you made your night choice, that an investigation on pops would be very beneficial with either investigation result as your would stop a mislynch, or reinforce a good one, with barros you only get a good amount of information from a guilty result, since an innocent result would simply allow you to scratch one person who hadn't been talking much off your list.
Your point? To me, he has made a good decision. Pops would probably have been lynched if Moratorium hadn't had the guilty result on Barros. Even if Moratorium had a not guilty result on Pops, I don't think it could have saved Pops without Moratorium claiming.
I liked you more when you were silent
I almost think you and Barros are the scumpair.
Also, if there's no doc and Moratorium had investigated Pops and received a not guilty result, I can predict who would have died N2 and N3.
Guy0 wrote:Fourth, you're just being annoying,
any investigation helps
, but one on pops would have been more useful, knowing what you did at the time.
So your point against Moratorium is?
Guy0 wrote:"well who cares if it was a good idea or not, it worked didn't it?"
If Moratorium is a cop, it was a risk. But I already showed you, why I think that it was a good move. I'm happy that he has chosen Barros over Pops. And yeah, it worked. What's wrong with saying that?
Pops wrote:everything I've done all day has made people in general think i'm innocent,
Like what? And who thinks this?
Guy0 wrote:I mean it was said that day 1 was not very well played and was incredibly short. I mean you can look at other games that have 20 pages by day 2 or, sometimes, even 1.
A few pages day 1=BAD!
Many pages day 1=BAD!
Quality is better than quantity.
Guy0 wrote:Then after barros gets lynched, moratorium goes, and then his scum buddy tries to get pops lynched, which gives a win for the mafia.
You know that this isn't possible right?
OK, I know my post is a little big
, but at least it contains everything I wanted to say.
Also to join Pops in the fun:
Cupcake Guy0 and Barros
You may cupvake multiple players right?
Mod is it possible to prod some players, like Moratorium, Barros and Capricious?
Is it also OK for me to PM Moratorium? I want to say something against him which is really offtopic and there's no reason to tell it here. I can understand it if it's not possible, but it's really urgent. If it means I have to let you check what I've written to PM him, I want to do that. I hope you get online soon so that I can hear your reply
Hope you guys are happy