What I was referring to was this:SlySly wrote:You may want to give pablito's thoughts on the topic a reread.Crazy wrote: I don't see how it's scummy (like pablito pointed out.)
pablito wrote: Thinking more and more about the whole pov thing, I was thinking paltry as town, but it makes me thing of him more as scummy now. There was a bit too much willingness to use it, even before kmd went up. As for llama's reaction, I'd have to think harder on that one.
Me too. What do you think the meaning of the bolded part is?Crazy wrote:What I was referring to was this:SlySly wrote:You may want to give pablito's thoughts on the topic a reread.Crazy wrote: I don't see how it's scummy (like pablito pointed out.)
pablito wrote: Thinking more and more about the whole pov thing,I was thinking paltry as town, but it makes me thing of him more as scummy now.There was a bit too much willingness to use it, even before kmd went up. As for llama's reaction, I'd have to think harder on that one.
Grandi wrote:HoH applicationform
1) Do you think it matters a good/experienced player gets elected as HoH?
No. What made HoHs fail in the first BB Mafia was that they went too far from the town's opinion and took full responsibility for the nominations. They started off well with a system, but an experienced player was seen as a good scumhunter and kept getting nominated, but he never actually nominated scum. Also, I think townies mostly had HoH if I remember correctly, it was good choosing by evicted people. What matters most is that the person is willing to take the forefront, and ask good questions while at the same time keeping their viewpoints transparent.
2) Do you think HoH should be guided by town? (as in, we still vote, and HoH picks the highest 2 in the VC)
Yes. one of the early HoHs abandoned whatever system was in place and no one ever returned to it. It really stifled all discussion. That was bad. I like the ideas already set forth that HoH should be able to explain why they do not go with town majority, and it should be fully expected in advance. No surprise attacks, please
3) If you are very suspicious of someone, would you pick him together with a seemingly town person if you were HoH to be sure your suspect gets lynched?
No. Always two big suspects. One of the biggest ways to pick up information is to see how people react to the nominee vs. nominee situation. Will someone attack nominee B just because he wants to save nominee A? Therefore both nominees must be people that need to be examined more closely or someone that everyone needs to pick an opinion on.
4) If i were HoH, i would pick ___ and ___
two people on the list of execution
Llama is about to go up. I have already explained why but I will summarize. He has tunneled on me for most of his time in the game and he panic lobbied for Paltry to waste the POV when kmd was in no danger. zwet and saber both null tell reads from my perspective. If people don't want Llama put up, they should quickly present a case as to why someone else is scummy.pablito wrote: I like the ideas already set forth that HoH should be able to explain why they do not go with town majority, and it should be fully expected in advance. No surprise attacks, please
I highly suspected kmd and Sens. That is why I put them up. I suspect hewitt far less than I suspected Sens. I suspect Paltry and Llama heavily for each of their parts in the POV wasting. Everyone else available for nomination is a null tell from my perspective. If you guys don't want Llama going up, convince me quick, time is running out.pablito wrote: Always two big suspects. One of the biggest ways to pick up information is to see how people react to the nominee vs. nominee situation. Will someone attack nominee B just because he wants to save nominee A? Therefore both nominees must be people that need to be examined more closely or someone that everyone needs to pick an opinion on.
-------------------------------SlySly wrote: Llama is on the hotseat. What do you think of the POV being wasted on you when you had no votes on you? Think that decision was a little on the rushed side? If yes, what does that say to you?
SlySly wrote:If it was town vs town, why weren't people going to vote kmd because he wasn't Sens? What made kmd the preferred townie to save over Sens? Was there maybe some actual basis about what I was saying about Sens?LlamaFluff wrote: Its an anti-lynch, not a policy lynch. That is why its so wrong. People arent going to saying "sens cause he is scummy" but "sens because he isnt kmd"
kmd got taken on the block with 0 votes against him in a hasty wasting of the POV by Paltry.animorpherv1 wrote:Can anyoen tell me why 2 people got replaced, and not 1 (kmd)?????
This. Hewitt is not on the block, I am, and I don't know why.farside22 wrote:replacement nominee vote count:
saberwolf (1) hewitt
Morph (1) Crazy
Note HOH must have a replacement nom in just about 3 hours from this point
This is farside's attempt at tracking the suggestion votes for who is to replace kmd on the block. Refer to my list, farside is just looking for bold post and missed a few. You are not on the block at this point.animorpherv1 wrote:This. Hewitt is not on the block, I am, and I don't know why.farside22 wrote:replacement nominee vote count:
saberwolf (1) hewitt
Morph (1) Crazy
Note HOH must have a replacement nom in just about 3 hours from this point