Raivann wrote:Danakillsu wrote:
3) Lynch Raivann. But if we don't do this today, even if he's scum, it probably won't hurt us.
oops!
unvote, Vote: Danakillsu
This vote seems OMGUS-ish. I mean, dana just finishes outlining his opinion on who our valid lynch candidates are and - surprise surprise - you show up on the list. Then instantly vote him. I'll admit your quoted text does make it seem like dana is trying to deflect some heat off of your threat-level, but I'm sure that's more an impact-not-intent matter (that is to say, he did not mean for that outcome).
Raivann wrote:If you guys don't lynch dana for pretty much claiming scum or Richard who is obvious scum, please lynch me.
Mina is probscum too, thats why she is voting me. To negate my awesome scumhunting. Not gonna fool me this time Mina!
That's just plain pathetic. I'll gladly lynch you, and everyone else should hop on board that. Even if you're
not
scum,
telling everyone to lynch you is anti-town play
. Even I can see that. It's apparent at this point that you are either:
- Scum, and desperate to avoid the lynch, or;
- a village idiot who has no real concern for the outcome of the game.
PREVIEW EDIT:
Ugh, really Raivann?
Raivann wrote:Sorry I read Dana's post wrong, I'm buzzing pretty good right now.
I thought he meant even if he's town it wont hurt us and typed scum because of a scumslip.... ugh.
I would rather we lynch Richard, but it doesn't seem to be going that way, so I hopped on popular wagon. Do I believe we have better chance of hiting scum with Richard lynch? Yes. But I'll go with the flow D1.
You draw tons of suspicion to yourself, now you're just trying to double back and save face. And failing pretty mightily. "Woops, I messed up, I'll just do what you guys want." Scum. A million times over.
Raivann wrote:Super smash goes out of his way to appear townie which makes him scummy.
FoS:SupersmashBrosfan
The accusation might actually hold some ground if you tried to justify it with a case. You just seem more and more desperate to avoid any suspicion, so you're just tossing spaghetti around at this point and hoping it sticks somewhere. In the last what - 40 minutes? - you've named no fewer than
four
"scummy" players and provided cases and/or evidence for
zero
. You best put on your thinking cap and make the best damn case you can - not to lynch someone else, but to let us know why the hell we shouldn't lynch you, because at this point I'm hoping it's apparent to everyone else what you are.
Douchebags get kind of a bad rap. They provide a useful service.