ReaperCharlie wrote:Your powers are weak, old man.
When I left you, I was but the learner; nowIam the master.
My reread will come tonight.
Absolutely. I thought he was more likely scum then town based on his behavior, and I didn't think he'd likely be someone a cult would recruit night zero cult recruit, so yes, I thought there was a good chance that he was a cult recruiter. Otherwise, I wouldn't have voted him.ReaperCharlie wrote:So Yos, I guess you were under the VERY STRONG impression that Furcolow was a cult recruiter yesterday?
So he clearly knew that the one-shot vig role was named "loose cannon", even though no one else had used that phrase. We know for a fact now that this is true, since Zwet flipped "loose cannon", and singersinger (TheLonging's replacement) also confirmed it.ooba wrote: Furcolow, Town reads based on
...
TheLonging - Secret reasons. He looks like a loose cannon.
Sure. Of course, the opposite is also true; you were dead wrong about your instance that dramonic was scum, and I was right in defending dramonic and refusing to vote for him.ReaperCharlie wrote:
Buuut you were still dead wrong, and I was right in refusing to vote for him.
Mmmmm. That makes a lot more sense.Yosarian2 wrote:Andreus: This was the day 1 breadcrumb. I didn't notice it myself until ooba pointed it out.
After TheLonging had softclaimed one-shot vig in a really obvious way, ooba said this
So he clearly knew that the one-shot vig role was named "loose cannon", even though no one else had used that phrase. We know for a fact now that this is true, since Zwet flipped "loose cannon", and singersinger (TheLonging's replacement) also confirmed it.ooba wrote: Furcolow, Town reads based on
...
TheLonging - Secret reasons. He looks like a loose cannon.
This doesn't really make sense. First, the ridiculous speculation on only one scum team? I suppose it is plausible; but the flavor, unless completely convoluted, suggests pretty clearly that there are two cult factions. Second, with you death how does that suggest only one scum group? With one or two scum groups either one would want you dead as long as you haven't been recruited to that group. Your death suggests that you were not a member of the scum group that killed you (unless you were shot by a town loose cannon which would be stupid) but it does not come close to suggesting that there is only one scum group.Andrius, 1596 wrote:So I had a thought; if I'm NK'd tonight, (barring any protection), there's probably only one scum-group. Because if there are 2, they'd possibly keep me around to hunt for each other? Especially if they can recruit me?
Was there a reason to think that someone might suggest a mass claim at this point? Isn't this pretty obvious?Andrius, 1613 wrote:Ugh. And no one better suggest a massclaim. That'd help the scum pick out what they want.
I see your point. But I fail to see why Faraday is likely recruiter beyond doubt; and unless I'm convinced that someone is actually a recruiter I'm satisfied with lynching a recruited person instead of someone who might not be either recruiter or recruited.Yosarian2, 1621 wrote:Question: how many days do you think the town can allow 2 cult recruiters to both survive and still have a reasonable chance of winning?
IMHO, The realistic answer is probably somewhere between 3 or 4. If both cult recruiters are still alive on day 5, we're talking up to 10 potential recruits; that's a worst case scenerio, but I don't really see town winning if both cult recruiters are still alive on day 5, even if we manage to lynch or vig a recruit or two before then.
So, in a 17 person game, we've got perhaps 3 chances to lynch a cult recruiter (today, tommorow, day 4) , or else town probably loses. Considering that we're talking about only 2/17 odds of hitting one if we lynch randomly today, the odds are not in our favor here, unless we get smart and put "lynching at least one cult recruiter" as our absolutely #1 priority.
Basically, looking at the numbers, I consider any argument in the form of "we shouldn't lynch X because he's probably not the recruiter" to be incredibly strong, because we don't have many chances left to lynch a cult recruiter and win. And I still don't see any likely scenerio here where ooba is a cult recruiter; the most likely scenerio here are that he's telling the truth about being a loose cannon, that he used his kill last night, and that he may or may not have been recruited at some point. If so, then we don't want to lynch him.
This is good posting. This I understand as to why ooba is not recruited. And regardless, as long as loose canons are only one shot and Ooba is telling the truth about shooting zwet then he is basically vanilla so he isn't a threat to be recruited.Yosarian2, 1630 wrote:At this point, I'm almost positive Ooba is not a cult recruiter. In fact, if I had to guess, I'd guess that he's probably still town; it's possible he could have been recruited after he made the kill last night, but it's really not all that likely.
The way we were sitting here outing PRs. Like, 4 a day. :Sxvart wrote: Was there a reason to think that someone might suggest a mass claim at this point? Isn't this pretty obvious?
Because gandalf brought it up.xvart wrote: Andy - why are you still speculating on scum having a NK or not? The way I see it is that if the cults have to recruit loose canons to submit their NKs then there are probably a fairly large number of loose canons, which, if they all submitted their action night one could be a total disaster. Additionally, if you think this, then do you think we should ask all the loose canons to use their double vote during the day so they don't have the option of recruiting a NK?
lol Because they'd go ahead and kill dramonic while keeping me alive for recruiting? I feel like recruiting a bodyguard would be a top priority for me as scum in here. :/xvart wrote: I'm starting to think that Andy has certainly been recruited. He seems to go out of the way to try and explain how he is town, speculates on things that make the cults less powerful and thus providing misinformation to the town.
I was voting for him because at the time, I thought he was recruited (still figuring out how that works, sorry) based on what everyone else was saying about recruitment, and the fact that I didn't believe there were three loose canons in the game. But it seems to me that he wouldn't have admitted to the kill or pointed out TL's soft-claim if he was shooting for the other team. I also didn't realize he had pointed out the "loose-canon" reference before zwet's kill, which would've cleared all suspicions that he just took a claim from someone who already flipped. I probably should've unvoted sooner, but there wasn't a serious threat as of yet, and I needed that confusion cleared up first.Yosarian2 wrote:Um...I still don't get your actions, singer; YOU were the one who confirmed his role. Why were you voting him, again?
Read my previous post, 1574. In case you still haven't picked up on this: role does not prove alignment in this game.Chronopie wrote:So just "Outright Scummy"?Erg0 wrote:It's a choice between singer and Chrono right now. I'd like to hear an explanation from singer about his ooba vote, which doesn't seem all that well-reasoned to me. Chrono is more outright scummy, though.
Aim: Chronopie
No reasons, nothing to refute, just hoping on the wagon?
I can say, with 100% honesty, that I am not a recruiter, nor have I been recruited. After all, I've made my role clear enough that Ialmostqualify for a share in Andy's bakery