[/quote]
Jmj, do read again, the answer to said question is listed above in the quotes. The motivation behind
2. Lady Lam, can you link the game for that self meta? It's suppper stretching the argument when you apply that meta to another person. And the concept of defensiveness is slightly weak since there are multiple reasons for one's defensiveness.
In this case since almost all the attacks are on Jabloc over his cupcake attacks, he's clearly the only one defending from that. It's a biased argument, perpetuated by the Jabloc attacks.
Persona A attacks B. B defends. Person C states B is overly defensive. C attacks B. B tries to defend off attacker A and B in this argument. Then it snowballs into awfulness.
3. Zwet is crazy Ythan. Worrying about miller cpr claims before he can prove it is suspicious. If Zwet is even serious there will be extra kills or lack of them (weak since there are multiple reasons for those), and if he's a miller he's a good sanity check for cops. If he's scum we'll see that.
When I read your post: the subtext reads as "get rid of the claimed extra killer".
4. Chesskid is a good kill target. I'd totally daykill that guy for the case of: contributing thin air to the wagon.
5. Mothrax is off. Something about that post reads: bandwagon hopping. Which I think is fine this early in the game, but the reasons are off.
Edit Hm something about insults/ad hom attacks reminds me of the point I made earlier.
6. Fate OMGUS, lets be OMGUS buddies and cross vote!
7. Zwet is still a very good kill target. Less noise, but then I wouldn't be able to see his avatar giggle when he types "giggles". /creepy moment.
8. Holy crap monies. That's expensive.