Reckamonic's Ocarina of Time Mafia..OVER! Was Hyrule saved?

[Ythan]

And I'll note that you provide NO PROOF that I am lying. You just come out and say it. You flood the chat with meaningless drabble, just to make it look re-searched, when nothing in your statements is based on FACT.

You keep saying "I LIED". Prove it. Other wise, you are the liar.

I'm

explaining

why you're a liar. You don't need to make three posts in a row to complain about it.

Your explanation shows no "proof".

All you say is "You're lying" or "I'm right, stop complaining".

Prove it, scum. Defend yourself with logic, or be ignored. Honestly.

Keep whining. It really doesn't matter. I don't need to spoonfeed this to you ad nauseum. I've explained and you can bitch about it until you hang for all I care if you're not going to actually make a point.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

You're not making valid points. If you think you are then defend them instead of constantly bitching about me disputing them.

And that's not proof you gigantic fool. She claimed aquatic because she saw it on the Zora claim. Have you seriously not picked that up after all this time.

Dude.

The only thing you can dispute at this point in time, is whether Cupcake is actually Nayru.

Nayru MUST be aquatic. It makes sense for Nayru to be Aquatic. The fact that King Zora is "Aquatic" confirms it. Unless you are claiming that ChessKids claim is false too.

So, essentially, what is it you are disputing?

The fact Nayru is aquatic? Sorry, that's not disputable. That's FACT.

The fact Cupcake is actually Nayru? Disputable. But you don't seem to care about that. I think Cupcake's claim is real, based on your action, and the quoted PM given.

So, which is it?

[Ythan]

Why is it everytime someone makes a valid point, you refute it with "No." "Lol try harder" or "I'm right, the end".

What you are doing is not logic.

I will show you why Aquatic is accepted.

POINT A: KING ZORA IS CLAIMED AS AQUATIC. NOT "WATER" BUT AQUATIC. WE CAN ASSUME ALL WATER CREATURES WILL BE "AQUATIC".
POINT B: NAYRU IS CLAIMED AS AQUATIC. THIS POINT IS DISPUTED.
POINT C: IT IS PROVEN THAT NAYRU IS THE GODDESS OF THE SEAS, WATER AND THE ZORA'S. THIS ASSOCIATES HER WITH WATER/ZORA'S.
POINT D: ZORA IS AQUATIC. WE CAN ASSUME WATER IS CALLED AQUATIC (thanks to chesskid).

ERGO, NAYRU IS AN /AQUATIC/ GODDESS.

CHECKMATE.

This is a horrible horrible horrible argument lul. She claimed what she saw in the Zora claim so she must be telling the truth. Your evidence points to the exact opposite conclusion you bumbling oaf.

[Ythan]

She claimed aquatic when she claimed Nayru, after seeing the Zora claim. You are a moron. CHECKMATE.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

And I'll note that you provide NO PROOF that I am lying. You just come out and say it. You flood the chat with meaningless drabble, just to make it look re-searched, when nothing in your statements is based on FACT.

You keep saying "I LIED". Prove it. Other wise, you are the liar.

I'm

explaining

why you're a liar. You don't need to make three posts in a row to complain about it.

Your explanation shows no "proof".

All you say is "You're lying" or "I'm right, stop complaining".

Prove it, scum. Defend yourself with logic, or be ignored. Honestly.

Keep whining. It really doesn't matter. I don't need to spoonfeed this to you ad nauseum. I've explained and you can bitch about it until you hang for all I care if you're not going to actually make a point.

WOW. I ASK FOR LOGIC, OR PROOF. AND YOU REFUSE.

OBVSCUM MUCH? LOL

"KEEP WHINING". AGAIN. YOU JUST KEEP PROVING ME RIGHT YTHAN. GO AHEAD. I JUST PRAY TOWN SEES THIS TOO.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

I refuse to argue with scum anymore.

You don't present evidence. You present fallacies and illogical conclusions.

Let the town decide. My vote will not change from you.

Last note: Ythan is such obvscum town. Please lynch him. For heavens sake.

[Ythan]

I'm just going to do this until you explain how your Nayru must be aquatic thing makes sense. Also don't use caps only good players get to be in the CLA.

[GandalfIzSik]

Okay, I'm still not read up, but Nayru is NOT aquatic. She's a goddess, her race would reflect that. Oh, and ythan is town, please stop bein stupid.

[Ythan]

You don't present evidence. You present fallacies and illogical conclusions.

It's a shame that you won't actually point one out. Because your entire attack is hysterics and blanket statement lies.

[Ythan]

Okay, I'm still not read up, but Nayru is NOT aquatic. She's a goddess, her race would reflect that. Oh, and ythan is town, please stop bein stupid.

Hi Gandalf-head, check your vote.

[Ythan]

Everyone please note the illogical and really irrelevant case that Lady made int he post I quoted in 1027. Not only do the points not follow from each other but the argument itself is entirely meaningless. She says Nayru must be aquatic because the Nayru-claimant claimed aquatic after King Zora claimed aquatic. Right.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

Everyone please note the illogical and really irrelevant case that Lady made int he post I quoted in 1027. Not only do the points not follow from each other but the argument itself is entirely meaningless. She says Nayru must be aquatic because the Nayru-claimant claimed aquatic after King Zora claimed aquatic. Right.

Except, you know, the sources I quoted, in which she is listed as a goddess of water, seas, zora's, ice... you know AQUATIC THINGS?

It's no co-incidence that Nayru is an /AQUATIC/ GODDESS race.

@ Gandalf: Goddess is part of her race. The other half is Aquatic.

[Ythan]

Except she isn't because the claim was fake and was built out of elements from other claims. Boring.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

You don't present evidence. You present fallacies and illogical conclusions.

It's a shame that you won't actually point one out. Because your entire attack is hysterics and blanket statement lies.

Pointed out several. You just ignored them, and continued to push through, without stopping and actually addressing the issues at hand. You simply state things, with no reasoning, and expect them to be taken as the truth.

Stop the bullshit. Give me more facts.

[Lady Lambdadelta]

Except she isn't because the claim was fake and was built out of elements from other claims. Boring.

Statement. No proof. Can you prove it? No. So stop treating it like it's a truth.

[Fate]

Ythan you DO realize you just halved the distance between you and Chronopie in terms of badassness with the epileptic avatar, right?

FFS turn that shit off.

^That goes for LL too. Shut the hell up.

Ythan wagon is fail as fuck.

That said...

[Fate]

I'll wait for a vote count since there isn't one in the last five friggin pages. The largest wagon from my short list gets my vote.

[Ythan]

You're just saying you've done things or that I've done things and you don't refer to them specifically because you're as completely full of shit as your case and you're hoping someone will be stupid enough to take your word for it. Please sit in a corner until enough players check in for us to lynch you or your scumbuddy.

That avatar really does not suit you at all.

[BrookylnConstruction]

WOW. I ASK FOR LOGIC, OR PROOF. AND YOU REFUSE.

OBVSCUM MUCH? LOL

"KEEP WHINING". AGAIN. YOU JUST KEEP PROVING ME RIGHT YTHAN. GO AHEAD. I JUST PRAY TOWN SEES THIS TOO.

Learn2read.

Also, you're not allowed to use all caps. Fate should rape you a new asshole.

[Fate]

YOU BOTH ARE FUCKING ARGUING ABOUT FLAVOR AND SEMANTICS AND BULLSHIT.

LET'S MOVE ON.

I'D RAPE LL BUT SHE SEEMS LIKE SHE'S 12 AND I DON'T WANT TO GO BACK TO PRISON

[Ythan]

I'm arguing about her arguing about flavor.

[Ythan]

Also this is way cooler than Chrono's avatar. A rapist made mine.

[Fate]

I KNOW THERE ARE MANY LAYERS OF BULLSHIT BUT THE WHIP CREAM TOPPING ON TOP IS HURTING MY EYES AND I SEE THE CRUST WAS FULL OF FLAVOR.

I WANT IT ALL TO GO AWAY.

[Ythan]

Also this is way cooler than Chrono's avatar. A rapist made mine.

That's not WHY it is cooler. <_<

[Lady Lambdadelta]

You're just saying you've done things or that I've done things and you don't refer to them specifically because you're as completely full of shit as your case and you're hoping someone will be stupid enough to take your word for it. Please sit in a corner until enough players check in for us to lynch you or your scumbuddy.

That avatar really does not suit you at all.

I'm just going to continue to point out statements that you make, which have no logical basing, but you assume them true anyway. And you want others to assume them true as well.

My avatar has nothing to do with this. I'm assuming that's a shot at my apparent "lack of logic". You're the one who's not proving a damn thing...

For once, just make a statement, and then give some kind of logical basis to it! If you can do that, I might consider think about it as being slightly reasonable.

Because right now, all you do it point your finger and say shit. And expect it to be true.