I have to laugh … wasn’t this the guy you begged to get in as an exception to the 3 Games on MS sign-up rule? Color me shocked.MOD wrote: daniel94581 has not responded to his prod, so he'll be replaced.
UNVOTE: DataData wrote:I'm the vig. GTFO. -_-
I was trying to be just a little scummy so that scum wouldn't NK me. I guess I went a little overboard. Can you tell it's been ages since I've played a strong town PR? >_<
Rule one – don’t lynch a claimed PR Day 1 when time exists to secure another lynch.
That said your claim makes me believe the ‘Be scummy’ explanation has validity since Vig is a horrible Mafia claim to make (see Clash of Kings Mafia and Raivann as an example).
On the other side Vig is the standard Serial Killer claim. I guess time will tell based on your behaviour and targets.
Moving back to my previous suspect –
VOTE: SquareOb
I don't find your explanations regarding your 'meta' vote early very credible and what you've posted since doesn't make me question my read.
SquareOb wrote:Scum are on the dana wagon. After some shifty RVS play his style has definitely changed to a more town-leaning vibe. Nitpicking early posts alone is not good enough.
These two posts make little sense to me.SqaureOb wrote:Oh, crap, I've been misreading votes as daNa instead of DaTa. Curse my non-existent dyslexia!
At the moment, however, I don't find Data particularly scummy, but that's probably because I haven't read him too much in-depth yet. I'll try to get on that this afternoon, but I have homework to do first.
1. The first post mimics my exact sentiment expressed way back at 75. LMP and I then went on to have a small exchange about that statement. If you had read this I don’t see you making the first statement.
2. I understand mistaking a data vote for a dana vote (see my mistake re: Furry) in an isolated occasion. The fact that you are claiming to mistake the entire data wagon (newly formed) for a dana wagon is troubling.
3. You claimed that there was scum on the dana wagon. Yet when you realize your mistake you state data isn’t particularly scummy despite NOT having read him in-depth. Is that pure gut reaction then?
Explain further. He had his first serious vote on Bowser at ISO 3 (10-20 RVS vote at 10-18) and then moved to me at ISO 4 (10-22). He unvotes me at ISO 8 (10-25) Neither vote stayed for an appreciable amount of time, IMO.danakillsu wrote:I do not believe that Data is scum at all. Look at where his vote is and has been for a while now.
It’s already been pointed out but Whut? If AGM had said “When Data flips Town” I can see your point. The fact that he said “If Data flips Town” nullifies any point you were trying to make.Nero wrote:Why town? Are you saying that you know that Data will flip town.