Good point. I keep thinking about this in SAII terms.VasudeVa wrote:3 corpses is 1 less than 4 corpses. That's a 25% decrease of corpses that cult could use to get dust!
WHAT AN AMAZING OFFER. UNDISPATCH NOW!
Stars Aligned III - The Tenth Day
Forum rules
- Wraith
-
Wraith Mafia Scum
- Wraith
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4168
- Joined: May 29, 2010
- Location: Central Party-Ruining Committee
Undispatch: FateShow"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist." -Helder Camara
"For myself, I want no advantage over my fellow man, and if he is weaker than I, all the more is it my duty to help him." -Eugene Debs
"Our demands most modest are - we only want the earth!" -James Connolly- Trilobite
-
Trilobite Goon
- Trilobite
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 319
- Joined: October 17, 2010
Except that 25% decrease goes into the next day phase and will present another chance for cult to get corpse dust when we dispatch Fate later anyway.
While the uncertainty of the flip hangs over the town for yet another day.
There's really no reason not to dispatch him now.
In fact, should multiple people die, this argument can be used to keep him from flipping for days. I'm not a fan of that.-
-
Benmage Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 13727
- Joined: December 20, 2008
dispatch fatecan I rob grave fate (on phone, looking to contribute tonight when I get home SC2 has been crack + crazy weekend )"ITT Benmage is making Shakespeare look cool. I need to bring you to my high school." -Vi
"If i must blantantly follow somone a player cannot do better than blindly following benmage" - tubby216- kunkstar7
-
kunkstar7 Mafia Scum
- kunkstar7
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: November 29, 2009
- Location: The Void.
- Contact:
VasudeVa wrote:Kunkstar defended your scummy little arse claiming that he understood the case in context. However, his defense was not indicative of someone who understood the case in context.
Bold and italics for emphasis. Unless you are saying that that single statement is your entire case on MoI (which you have stated is not true), then you have misrepresented the section as a whole. I specifically stated that I read theKunkstar7 wrote:This is an entirely confusingstatement, and it doesn't sit well with me (I readand it still didn't look acceptable)itin contextstatementin context and it didn't make sense. I never claimed to understand the case, actually I stated otherwise and asked for clarification on the case:
I am looking for your intention and motives in attacking MoI, along with reasoning. When I read a lot of "VOTE MOI KTHX" style posting it serves no purpose and doesn't express to me why you want MoI lynched. You are not furthering your case. When I went back to read the situation between your two I noted that a lot of your recent posting was as such, and couldn't surmise your case on MoI. I did not understand your attack on MoI (Here your statement that I didn't understand the case applies, with the exception that I never claimed to understand it.).Kunkstar7 wrote:What exactly constitutes your case on MoI? I found a lot of mention of him being bullying, yet then you diverge and say he is being passive-aggressive as a scumtell.
In Response to Wicked:
Chalk it up to playstyle, game speed, whatever, I can't really provide a response to this.1. He has completely flown under the radar.
I'll say that I wasn't particularly thrilled to go into this game again with Furcolow. I'll admit that I let my emotions rule my judgement towards Furcolow and I felt his mess of a N0 claim was a manifestation of his murderous intent.2. He tunneled on Furcolow for a large portion of the game and didn't change his vote until page 51.
How have I explicitly avoided taking stances? Or is it merely a lack of mention of stances? Yes, I'll admit that I do have a lot of theory posting, but that's what I enjoy about Stars Aligned.3. Prior to switching his vote to ReaperCharlie, kunkstar gave no scumreads apart from Furcolow. The rest of his posting had consisted of town reads and theory posting. He has avoided taking stances.
My vote on Furcolow goes along with the previous point, not sure how it was opportunistic when Furcolow was playing horribly scummy and Percy's final clarification wasn't given to end the matter. Several players even voted Furcolow after myself, are they not opportunistic as well? Considering the lynch threshold I would argue against the opportunitistic claim of the El Goosuki vote, a third vote hardly constitutes a wagon. In any case El Goosuki has continued to display the issues that made me vote for them in the first place.4. All of his votes have been opportunistic. The vote for Furcolow was when the spotlight was on him. The vote for ReaperCharlie was after 8 players had already voted him. His reason for voting RC was very weak. It looked like he was trying to jump on the bandwagon using his own reasons. Then, there was the vote for El Goosuki today which was the third vote on the bandwagon. Considering the sizes of the other bandwagons, this vote does look opportunistic as well.
My D1 scumreads weren't strong, but fairly confident in townreads though. Most of its gut D1 for me. El Goosuki has continued to flounder and doesn't provide any input of their own, point in case - MoI vote.5. He doesn't give too many reads, but even some of the ones he has given have been bad:
By the way, back from V/LA.Welcome to the Network.- SpyreX
-
SpyreX POWERFUL WIZARD
- SpyreX
- POWERFUL WIZARD
- POWERFUL WIZARD
- Posts: 18596
- Joined: April 24, 2008
Ohhhh so you're just making stuff up I get it now.av wrote:@SpyreX - Agreeing with people is not suspicious. What is suspicious is that you were actively trying to avoid accusations of sheeping by putting that 0% comment which had no bearing on your vote. You were padding out the sheeping because you'd been called out on it. You can continue to misinterpret me if you want.
So, saying ElG has been doing nothing BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY IN ADDITION TO DOING NOTHING (which others have done) has managed to ACTIVELY GO BACKWARDS is avoiding the sheep by saying directly that Seacore pointed it out before I could.SpyreX wrote:Has done nothing useful. At all. 0%.
Which isn't enough [to warrant a vote over other nothings] but Seacore was tech enough to do the dance right and call out:
Awesome.
----
See, that's the thing.Trilobite wrote:Except that 25% decrease goes into the next day phase and will present another chance for cult to get corpse dust when we dispatch Fate later anyway.
While the uncertainty of the flip hangs over the town for yet another day.
There's really no reason not to dispatch him now.
In fact, should multiple people die, this argument can be used to keep him from flipping for days. I'm not a fan of that.
I see absolutely no uncertainty in that flip. None, zero, zip.
So I'll be THAT GUY and say why bother with it? Not today, not later, not ever.
Its not worth the book or the robbing dance. Unless someone actually thinks there's a chance for a scum flip there in which case lets talk about how space monkeys that is.- Trilobite
-
Trilobite Goon
- Trilobite
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 319
- Joined: October 17, 2010
Reads can be wrong. I'm presuming nothing.SpyreX wrote:
See, that's the thing.Trilobite wrote:Except that 25% decrease goes into the next day phase and will present another chance for cult to get corpse dust when we dispatch Fate later anyway.
While the uncertainty of the flip hangs over the town for yet another day.
There's really no reason not to dispatch him now.
In fact, should multiple people die, this argument can be used to keep him from flipping for days. I'm not a fan of that.
I see absolutely no uncertainty in that flip. None, zero, zip.
So I'll be THAT GUY and say why bother with it? Not today, not later, not ever.
Its not worth the book or the robbing dance. Unless someone actually thinks there's a chance for a scum flip there in which case lets talk about how space monkeys that is.
Flip > No flip
By far.
@Kunk
Do you have any thoughts or opinions on Magna?- Seacore
-
Seacore Mafia Scum
- Seacore
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3109
- Joined: November 4, 2009
- Location: Australia, UCT+10
I agree with Trilo, I don't want to presume Fate's town, even though I'd be willing to bet money on it.
And if we're going to flip him, we should do it now for three reasons.
1) We have more townies than we'll ever have, so we can spread the insanities around easier than later
2) We'll just keep having more and more bodies to grave rob, so we might as well get it over with. If we dispatch him today we'll have 4 bodies. Tomorrow we'll have at least three plus fate if we wait..
3) Information now is better than information later.- SpyreX
-
SpyreX POWERFUL WIZARD
- SpyreX
- POWERFUL WIZARD
- POWERFUL WIZARD
- Posts: 18596
- Joined: April 24, 2008
Did I miss something?2) We'll just keep having more and more bodies to grave rob, so we might as well get it over with. If we dispatch him today we'll have 4 bodies. Tomorrow we'll have at least three plus fate if we wait..- Seacore
-
Seacore Mafia Scum
- Seacore
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3109
- Joined: November 4, 2009
- Location: Australia, UCT+10
- SpyreX
-
SpyreX POWERFUL WIZARD
- SpyreX
- Seacore
-
Seacore Mafia Scum
- Seacore
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3109
- Joined: November 4, 2009
- Location: Australia, UCT+10
- El Goosuki
-
El Goosuki Goon
- El Goosuki
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 123
- Joined: October 17, 2010
Someone said he was scummy and not very active, I forget who, I also recall he was on our dodgy player list yesterday for gut read. Most importantly, he's the only viable alternative to our own lynch. To continue being candid, our play has been so bad, we would probably scream for our own lynch if we didn't know our alignment.AurorusVox wrote:El G: what is the scummiest thing that MoI has done and why?
-DGB- Seacore
-
Seacore Mafia Scum
- Seacore
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3109
- Joined: November 4, 2009
- Location: Australia, UCT+10
Are any of you attempting to actually contribute? Because if you aren't actually playing please leave the game.El Goosuki wrote:
Someone said he was scummy and not very active, I forget who, I also recall he was on our dodgy player list yesterday for gut read. Most importantly, he's the only viable alternative to our own lynch. To continue being candid, our play has been so bad, we would probably scream for our own lynch if we didn't know our alignment.AurorusVox wrote:El G: what is the scummiest thing that MoI has done and why?
-DGB- El Goosuki
-
El Goosuki Goon
- El Goosuki
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 123
- Joined: October 17, 2010
- El Goosuki
-
El Goosuki Goon
- El Goosuki
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 123
- Joined: October 17, 2010
- Seacore
-
Seacore Mafia Scum
- Seacore
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3109
- Joined: November 4, 2009
- Location: Australia, UCT+10
You are remembering wrong.
But it's not just anti-contribution in your case. DGB has admitted that you, as a team, have done nothing and look really scummy based on your actions. Basically agreeing that the case on you is enough to warrant a lynch.
If you are indeed town, just throwing a vote on a rival wagon and doing nothing else strikes me as injuring town. Particularly when, prior to my post asking for a replacement, your slot has made no attempt to get caught up. That's not just contributing less than others, doing nothing but appearing scummy.- Seacore
-
Seacore Mafia Scum
- Seacore
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3109
- Joined: November 4, 2009
- Location: Australia, UCT+10
- Baby Spice
-
Baby Spice Mafia Scum
- Baby Spice
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1740
- Joined: September 10, 2010
- Location: Australia
Disagree. i believe that honour goes to Wickedest.VaVa wrote:But he can help the Town because he is the closest thing we have to a confirmed investigator.I don't know what annoys me more. Bad Harry Potter fan fiction that gets the facts right, or good Harry Potter fan fiction that doesn't.
Sometimes, when I say "I'm okay", I want someone to give me a hug and say, "Let's watch Doctor Who"- Furpants_Tom
-
Furpants_Tom Goon
- Furpants_Tom
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 394
- Joined: January 25, 2009
Hey again, everyone got some catching up to do.
SpyreX wrote: This after the d1 pigeonhole votes until RC and the 180 from "Ben killing is awesome" to "Ben is a plague" is a whoooooonellly of a switch.
I'm not sure I'm seeing the inconsistency here. In D1, I attempted to use my vote to pressure Bowser into answering questions; which didn't work. In D2 I attempted to use my vote to pressure BenMage into answering questions, which didn't work. I'm consistent, I'm just not very successful.
And in D1, there was no chance Ben would kill, because he'd announced his target and someone would block it. So lynching or attempting to lynch Ben was a bad plan. Today, there is a good chance Ben will kill, because we don't know who he's aiming for. And his judgement is pretty awful, so I'm not hopeful it'll be cult.
That said, Plan A was to pile on a lot of pressure early in the day, and get him to spill the target so we could go back to ignoring him. But no-one backed the play, so I guess that's not happening.
Nope, that's definitely odd. And for xvart, a rather unlucky coincidence, considering his N0 action was to target someone also targeted by Baby Spice.Baby Spice wrote: Am I the only one who finds Xvart and El Goos targeting each other slightly hinky. Especially with El G choosing to look for something that couldn't be there.
Xvart's explanation for his Goo action is interesting, but by the end of D1, I'm pretty sure that Furcolow's story was well accepted. Moreover, given that there had already been a mod clarification that pretty much spelt out what would happen in Furcolow's case, I don't know what additional proof you were looking for. So it's difficult to see exactly how your action benefited the town.
Warding people on N0 and N1 is fine; but the unique circumstances of your actions are starting to cause me puzzlement and dismay.
Xvart: Do you think that anyone else was likely to have been targeting El Goosuki last night?
Your basic argument is that you don't believe that cultists take risks, right? And so far you've absolved BenMage, MoI, and LostButterfly of cultic tendencies because they've all played too dangerously, correct?manho wrote:
his attack of furcolow's confirmness is not something cult will do, and so hard. i think they would have given up that argument long before MoI did. they won't want that much attraction that early on an unlikely mislynch.VP Baltar wrote:
why? I want a damn explanation of these town reads on him because I see nothing to indicate that.manho wrote:done iso on MoI, but he is town.
that would be the greatest gambit if he is really cult and not being caught soon. there are too many risk for a cult to claim stalking someone, without any reason.AurorusVox wrote:WHY do you not think [Benmage]'s cult? What has he done to make you think that?
So I'm curious - Manho, where would scum be trying to direct attention today?
manho wrote:
me.Furpants_Tom wrote:Does anyone genuinely believe this kill is more likely to hit scum than town?Manho, who do you think Benmage is targeting?
I think this is a pretty important question, and it could use a real answer. Yes, you claimed first; but if you're cult, you would know that Wickedjstr had been rezzed, and could falsely claim it before the real doctor. It's also a great way of explaining your blood, if you've been taking part in the ritual.nopointinactingup wrote:
Cuz he's cul.Plum wrote:why Rez Wicked???
SSBF seemed legit to me; but your answers so far aren't similarly compelling.
Nopoint, why rez Wicked? Why not answer Plum?
He's been pretty quiet, true, and he's avoided making too many waves - he's got a real submarine vibe to him. I agree that he was looking at Furcolow for way longer than necessary. I think xvart is guilty of that, too. I don't have a problem with theory-heavy players, nor cautious players, for that matter; so that part doesn't worry me; except that players who are cautious and theory-heavy usually try and bracket their weak gut-reads with some kind of fact-based security blanket, which he doesn't. Overall, yes, kunkstar7 is someone I think is potential cult.Wickedestjr wrote:Vote: kunkstar7He is such obvious scum. Just read him in isolation. The points against him:
1. He has completely flown under the radar.
2. He tunneled on Furcolow for a large portion of the game and didn't change his vote until page 51.
3. Prior to switching his vote to ReaperCharlie, kunkstar gave no scumreads apart from Furcolow. The rest of his posting had consisted of town reads and theory posting. He has avoided taking stances.
4. All of his votes have been opportunistic. The vote for Furcolow was when the spotlight was on him. The vote for ReaperCharlie was after 8 players had already voted him. His reason for voting RC was very weak. It looked like he was trying to jump on the bandwagon using his own reasons. Then, there was the vote for El Goosuki today which was the third vote on the bandwagon. Considering the sizes of the other bandwagons, this vote does look opportunistic as well.
5. He doesn't give too many reads, but even some of the ones he has given have been bad:
This is probably the reason why I'm swinging towards MoI as scum. In D1, I felt he was a genuinely odious individual to share a forum with; but I could see what he was trying to do - savaging a few people he thought were potentially dodgy, trying to shake them down for info.VP Baltar wrote: 4) Again today I see almost no direction from Magna in his scum hunting. I see a lot of defending himself and being generally kind of pissy about being called out as scum, but I for the life of me cannot tell you who Magna is suspicious of or wants lynched. I still find it weird that he isn't pushing the AV case Spyrex is still on about. I don't see anything that has changed from that really. Magna, do you find AV scummy or not? If no, what changed? If yes, why are you not voting him?
Today, not so much. He's just flailing and flinging the occasional OMGUS.
MoI - what do you think of AV today?
nopointinactingup - double rez participantTrilobite wrote:Furpants:Top cult suspects ASAP please.
Feysal - double rez participant
kunkstar7 - submariner par excellence
xvart - too many night action coincidences
SpyreX, what do you think of xvart?
Re: Fate - I don't see how flipping today instead of tomorrow helps us. And giving more unverified "townies" a chance to sneak corpse dust is a bad idea, unless there's something really good in it for us. Today we have wicked and Furc as effectively confirmed, and one of them needs to launder; so we can afford 3 corpses - RC, LostButterfly and the lynch.
Unvote
Vote: Kunkstar7- Triglav
-
Triglav Goon
- Triglav
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 185
- Joined: August 11, 2010
I follow. Think you're crazy, but follow. There are starving children in Africa who could use your tin foil to save dinner for tomorrow night.AurorusVox wrote:@Triglav - I think I'm the only person in the whole game who still thinks Benmage is cult, so "OMG HE MIGHT GO MURDERER" being bullshit isn't really something to ask me to respond to. If he is an investigator, I don't think he'll get very far as murderer if we can shut him down effectively, and I'd recommend lynching him on D5 if he makes it that far just in case. I've said multiple times why I think he's cult but I must just be crazy since I'm 1/25 that think so.
Dispatching is a no-go here. Why kill town? If you disagree with Fate-town, why? Please point out more than "OMG reads can be wrong!" Remember, the kids in Africa.We are an amalgamation of Adel, Albert B. Rampage, Zorblag, and Ythan (twice).
We are, in absolute honesty, a conglomeration of gandalf, drmyshottyizsik, and MichaelSableheart.
We are currently operating as an omniscient culmination of Fate, Glork and ZazieR.- nopointinactingup
-
nopointinactingup Mafia Scum
- nopointinactingup
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2872
- Joined: February 11, 2010
- Contact:
I asked the Mod some questions. His reply looks consistent. I don't think he could have known that if we both rez you from a cult kill, it would be BOTH SUCCESSFUL and we'd both get blood. My only concern is his apathy towards the fact that we both claimed rezzing you.Wickedestjr wrote: 2. The two people rezzing meisnoteworthy. Nopoint being the first person to claim the rez before I even claimed that I had been rezzed means he is probably another confirmed town (he might be a good grave robber too and possibly a better choice than Furcolow. nopoint, what do you think of grave robbing?). Feysal claiming to have rezzed me could be him covering up for his blood if he is a cultist or murderer. There's nothing to confirm that, but I'm keeping an eye on him.
[/quote]Wickedestjr wrote: With only one murderer they have automatically fulfilled a.) and don't have to worry about b.) either, so the only thing they have to do is murder two more times. I think it was stated last SA game that we should focus on cult during the day and murderers at night. Does that strategy apply here too? Thoughts on this?
I think if the murders go way out of hand. We can sacrifice Benmage ( make him take the murderer route ) to stop the murderer from winning.
You never doVP Baltar wrote:I don't have a strong enough town read on nopoint right now.
But I really did Rez him because he's culFurpants_Tom wrote:
I think this is a pretty important question, and it could use a real answer. Yes, you claimed first; but if you're cult, you would know that Wickedjstr had been rezzed, and could falsely claim it before the real doctor. It's also a great way of explaining your blood, if you've been taking part in the ritual.
SSBF seemed legit to me; but your answers so far aren't similarly compelling.
Not to mention he was being his townish self and that he's obvly the "middle town" that cult would pick.
I could see myself doing such thing if I was cult though ^_^.
What are you trying to elicit from my response? And why not ask Feysal? Is it because ... I'm voting you?Furpants_Tom wrote:Nopoint, why rez Wicked? Why not answer Plum?Justice will prevail
\m/- Furpants_Tom
-
Furpants_Tom Goon
- Furpants_Tom
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 394
- Joined: January 25, 2009
Two people just happening to rez the cult kill is a huge coinkydink. I'm trying to figure out who had a genuinely townie reason to protect him, because I think there's a good chance you're not both telling the truth. And I'm not asking Feysal because... he already answered. For reference:nopointinactingup wrote:
What are you trying to elicit from my response? And why not ask Feysal? Is it because ... I'm voting you?Furpants_Tom wrote:Nopoint, why rez Wicked? Why not answer Plum?
Feysal #1912 wrote:
I had a res kit and 8 potential targets to use it on. My feelings about them were mostly neutral. hitogoroshi I considered town, despite the Fate fiasco, but he also felt too obvious. I considered xvart, but settled on Wickedestjr, since he'd been catching up and I thought he might be overlooked otherwise. Apparently not.Plum #1872 wrote:As it is I find it somewhat suspect that we have two claimed successful Wicked Rezzers. Question being - to both of them -why Rez Wicked???- nopointinactingup
-
nopointinactingup Mafia Scum
- nopointinactingup
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2872
- Joined: February 11, 2010
- Contact:
- Furpants_Tom
-
Furpants_Tom Goon
- Furpants_Tom
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 394
- Joined: January 25, 2009
- Furpants_Tom
-
Furpants_Tom Goon
- Furpants_Tom
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 394
- Joined: January 25, 2009
- Furpants_Tom
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Furpants_Tom
- nopointinactingup
- Furpants_Tom
- nopointinactingup
- Triglav
- Furpants_Tom
- Baby Spice
- Seacore
- Seacore
- El Goosuki
- El Goosuki
- Seacore
- El Goosuki
- Seacore
- Seacore
- SpyreX
- Seacore
- Trilobite
- SpyreX
- kunkstar7
- Trilobite
- Wraith