In any case,
@Beaver/s I find confusion in your entire self, but I have yet to find more than confusion or any reason to find you scummalicious. Yet.
This was a response to a question posed to me. I am not making out it isThe Fonz wrote:Lazy at best and possibly opportunistic justification for that vote. Making out that it's really scummy just because it's a bad idea.
Regardless of why that particular hydra got hunted down, not claiming your names is at best distracting town and at worst an attempt to hide a scum meta.Fuzzy Beavers wrote:OIC why. Except I don't think that Hydra was hunted down because they refused to claim their heads, even though they were scum. The other hydra auto-claimed their name. I got lectured by Troll using similar logic because case by case situations don't always apply back in Gods and Men. Maaan he was so mad at me. But I an empathetic to that logic style.
- Sympathizing Beaver.
Do a little reading of your own, This half is easy to figure out with the above hint hint hint hint.
You missed my three questions.LlamaFluff wrote:@boberz - Opinion on head claim? Is it scummy to vote [fuzzy] due to refusal? Have you read supernatural?
Its not about meta. Personally I think meta is stupid and quite frankly I DON'T really care what two heads they are. The problem is, as was the case in Supernatural, he/she is being fairly obstinate. One head said we could figure it out and I'm sure I could but I don't feel like jumping hoops right now.Zang wrote:Fuzzy Beavers is very confusing but I see nothing wrong with not revealing his main accounts. I've seen several players who don't believe in meta.
It's this part that irritates me and is making me think this should be an actual vote instead of a conditional one that will be removed if they claim names. How is it helpful at all to make us waste time playing these games to figure out what your account is?Fuzzy Beavers wrote: Do a little reading of your own, This half is easy to figure out with the above hint hint hint hint.
Never said its not useful; just I don't think its the say all be all of scum hunting.jasonT1981 wrote:im not sureyour right Nero, I think Meta can be an excellent tool to pin down scum or find out if someone is town. but its harder to use with a hydra account.
Vote hopping? Lol.... is noone else guilty of this? How could his alignment help? ....don't want to say more....nah nah nah. Say more.Hiraki wrote:DH needs to die. His vote hopping and opinion are anti-town.
Not to mention, his alignment could really help this game.
There's more I could say, but I don't really want to.
Vote: DemonHybrid
I am too. I don't think we've really ruined our votes worth though. If anything, we're just giving him a chance to remove our suspicion of him by saying exactly what it is we want.Benmage wrote:First Which I am guilty as well is that we completely undermine our votes on beaver by saying we will remove. Well why are they there? They are there because he is purposely and willfully withholding information from the town which is inherently antitown. Therefore I ask the question, since we have already ruined any worth to our votes, is anyone willing to go through with their votes and see that beavers is lynched if he maintains this obstinate behavior? I am.
Your words are true. Yet DH is the one that stands out the most due to the combination of his behavior, and the vote hopping.Benmage wrote:Vote hopping? Lol.... is noone else guilty of this? How could his alignment help? ....don't want to say more....nah nah nah. Say more.Hiraki wrote:DH needs to die. His vote hopping and opinion are anti-town.
Not to mention, his alignment could really help this game.
There's more I could say, but I don't really want to.
Vote: DemonHybrid
That's another hing I hate when people make you try and assume things like in bobs case or in this case, don't spell everything out. Spell it out. We need everything from everyone. I hate pulling teeth from people and if I had a second vote it'd be on Hiraki.
Indeed. However if he maintains this stance of being difficult and scummy he will, for me at least, reach a point of no return. Are we expected to ring him up to L-1 for a simple claim. And then what he throws his hands up and goes "fine" and claims...What a fucking waste of time that would be.ribwich wrote:I am too. I don't think we've really ruined our votes worth though. If anything, we're just giving him a chance to remove our suspicion of him by saying exactly what it is we want.Benmage wrote:First Which I am guilty as well is that we completely undermine our votes on beaver by saying we will remove. Well why are they there? They are there because he is purposely and willfully withholding information from the town which is inherently antitown. Therefore I ask the question, since we have already ruined any worth to our votes, is anyone willing to go through with their votes and see that beavers is lynched if he maintains this obstinate behavior? I am.