Mafia of the Chosen Ones (Game Over!)

Guderian · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:27 pm

It seems to be a precedent to troll/post/insult in caps and it seems to go unnoticed or be declared town play.

Inhim's #173 makes no sense, isn't funny, and does nothing. But hey, its in caps!

inHimshallibe · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:29 pm

Equinox wrote:Did I just see a slip on page 1? Coolio.

Equinox was the first to point this out, and so he is the only one that gets the credit for it. Sorry Guderian, day late and a dollar short and all.

Andrius · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:32 pm

inHim isn't guaranteed town, Gud.
He is, however, not much of a threat, because of his massive love of Fate and I. /no offense inHimske.

Equinox · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:32 pm

Magua wrote:It is serious, but it is not based on anything that has occurred in this game.

All right, fair enough.

Kitoari wrote:Guderian is scummier than Jack.

What I was trying to say is that the slip is bad and not an indication of towniness, but I eventually decided after I posted that post that gude was scummier.

Hmm... What do you think of Guderian's suspicion/vote of Jack in post 69, then?

inHimshallibe wrote:
Equinox wrote:Did I just see a slip on page 1? Coolio.
Equinox was the first to point this out, and so he is the only one that gets the credit for it. Sorry Guderian, day late and a dollar short and all.

You called Guderian town for his move earlier today, though; what changed?

inHimshallibe · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:33 pm

Andrius wrote:inHim isn't guaranteed town, Gud.
He is, however, not much of a threat, because of his massive love of Fate and I. /no offense inHimske.

I missed the guarandamnteed town list by about three hours, methinks.

Andrius · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:34 pm

Oh inHim. <3 You can prove yourself in other ways.
Razing countrysides with me is only the first step.
Today, we lynch a scumbag.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:35 pm

Equinox wrote:
inHimshallibe wrote:
Equinox wrote:Did I just see a slip on page 1? Coolio.
Equinox was the first to point this out, and so he is the only one that gets the credit for it. Sorry Guderian, day late and a dollar short and all.
You called Guderian town for his move earlier today, though; what changed?

I meant you.

Magua · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:39 pm

I like Equinox.

Equinox · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:42 pm

Apparently, I'm misunderstanding something here, then. Clarify/correct it for me, please?

As I understand post 100, you believe Guderian's vote for Jack in post 69 to be a town move, since you put him under your town list. In post 176, you say Guderian doesn't get the credit for calling out Jack because I did it first; however, you gave him that credit in post 100. What changed?

inHimshallibe · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:45 pm

Equinox wrote:Apparently, I'm misunderstanding something here, then. Clarify/correct it for me, please?

As I understand post 100, you believe Guderian's vote for Jack in post 69 to be a town move, since you put him under your town list. In post 176, you say Guderian doesn't get the credit for calling out Jack because I did it first; however, you gave him that credit in post 100. What changed?

I could not remember who the first person to call out what they believed to be a slip by Jack and my left pinky was getting a little itchy. As a placeholder I put the person who voted for Jack instead of Equinox. Should've been you from the start.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:47 pm

inHimshallibe wrote:
Equinox wrote:Apparently, I'm misunderstanding something here, then. Clarify/correct it for me, please?

As I understand post 100, you believe Guderian's vote for Jack in post 69 to be a town move, since you put him under your town list. In post 176, you say Guderian doesn't get the credit for calling out Jack because I did it first; however, you gave him that credit in post 100. What changed?
I could not remember who the first person to call out what they believed to be a slip by Jack and my left pinky was getting a little itchy. As a placeholder I put the person who voted for Jack instead of Equinox. Should've been you from the start.

I blame whoever didn't correct me immediately so I could go "Guderian? Fuck no. The one who said something first."

mothrax · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:53 pm

inhim, you spew a lot of shit with virtually nothing to back it up. Its nice that you are giving scum a townlist though, tells them who not to kill. Your self contradiction between your "two day pass" post and your "town list" post is noted.

@guderian: Yes, if another player had done something similar I would probably have been more worried about it. It doesn't read like a slip to me.
Let me try to explain it in another way.
Meet Player A. Player A likes to do dumb shit on page one. Player A once claimed a power role in a 2 powerrole open setup game on page one of day one. Player A was not said powerrole in the long run but the discussion generated by this claim helped Player A get reads on the other players. If Player A were to purposfully "scumslip" on page one the reactions garnered would provide excellent reads. For example. You jumped on that hard as soon as some pressure came down on you.
in other words

Vote Guderian

Katsuki · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:54 pm

WTF IS THIS SHIT
7 PAGES WHILE I WAS GONE?!
NOT READING THIS NOW

ANDRIUS DON'T YOU STEAL MA FATE FROM ME YOU HOMEWREAKER

Andrius · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:55 pm

KATSUKI ITS OK I HAVE NACHO AND VAS WHEN FEMALES ARENT PRESENT.

Jack · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:55 pm

vote:guderian

I don't think he's the same alignment as me.

Guderian · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 5:56 pm

I just want it clarified. I am being wagoned mothrax because you think that calling out a potential scum slip is wayyyy scummy, and then defending this action has confirmed me as scum for coming 'down to hard?'

inHimshallibe · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:04 pm

omg slip

Jack · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:05 pm

*states exaggerated form of accusation in an incredulous tone*
*rests his case*

Guderian · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:05 pm

It'd be better if you all said "this wagon is policy/lulz/ nonsense" because then at least I could understand it. But to claim "this is some serious stuff for serious reasons" is laughable and ridiculous.

mothrax · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:06 pm

No, my vote for you is because you saw it and even after two players who have experience with the player said that it was nothing you still went after it. It has been explained and you still pushed it.

mothrax · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:07 pm

The wagon might be lulzy, but most early game wagons are Gude. there is at least one vote on you that has nothing to do with policy/lulz/whatever.

Andrius · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:08 pm

Guderian, this is serious shit.
Talk to Fate.

Katsuki · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:08 pm

TBQH ID REALLY APPRECIATE IF THIS DAY LASTED AT LEAST A DAY

LETTING SCUM GET FREE NKS WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF US ESTABLISHING ANY READS "D1" IS NOT GOOD FOR TOWN. WE CANT BE JUST THROWING AWAY THE LIVES OF PLAYERS WHO SCUM DO NOT WANT TO PLAY WITH.

Katsuki · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:09 pm

ANDY CAN YOU SUM UP GUD CASE FOR ME?
I DONT WANT TO READ ALL THIS STUFF RIGHT NAO

Katsuki · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Wed Jan 12, 2011 6:09 pm

Andrius wrote:KATSUKI ITS OK I HAVE NACHO AND VAS WHEN FEMALES ARENT PRESENT.

WAIT VV IS NOT IN THIS GAME IS HE?

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
WAIT AM I TALKING ABOUT VV OR VI
= =