American Gods Mafia - Game over

[WrathChild]

EBWOP: But yes, I did the same thing my last game here too. The group I come from knows this, but since I'm new here I feel it is good to let everyone know.

[OhGodMyLife]

Unless something really funky happens I foresee always electing myself.

How do you feel about those who have elected so far and not elected themselves?

They obviously don't have the same hyper-inflated sense of self worth that I have. Not everyone can be this awesome.

If you have confidence in your game, you should want to be a part of the masonry each night. Not doing so is simply limiting your interactions, which is always scummy.

[animorpherv1]

Elect farside22, Ythill, LlamaFluff

Because I trust their judgement. Even if Llama is policy voting me. It's an early D1 vote. I'm not worried. Wraith's vote is stupid, and unless I see some underlying scum reason to OMGUS vote a voter who random voted him (extremely unlikely), then I'll ignore it.

I stand by my Wraith vote, however. All Wraith has done so far is explain how many games he's been in, defend himself and give us a very tiny amount of meta.

I'd also be up for an SGR lynch, however. That post on D2 just screams "Hello, I'm here and I'm going to defend Wraith because he's my scum buddy".

[A Gaggle of Geese]

Unless something really funky happens I foresee always electing myself.

How do you feel about those who have elected so far and not elected themselves?

They obviously don't have the same hyper-inflated sense of self worth that I have. Not everyone can be this awesome.

If you have confidence in your game, you should want to be a part of the masonry each night. Not doing so is simply limiting your interactions, which is always scummy.

Fair enough. One final question: Do you think we should nominate ourselves to go backstage, or seeing as we are two, should weallow those who have only one head the chance to bounce reads around?

[Tasky]

will read the thread and post tomorrow, no time now.

[WrathChild]

Elect farside22, Ythill, LlamaFluff

Because I trust their judgement. Even if Llama is policy voting me. It's an early D1 vote. I'm not worried. Wraith's vote is stupid, and unless I see some underlying scum reason to OMGUS vote a voter who random voted him (extremely unlikely), then I'll ignore it.

I stand by my Wraith vote, however. All Wraith has done so far is explain how many games he's been in, defend himself and give us a very tiny amount of meta.

I'd also be up for an SGR lynch, however. That post on D2 just screams "Hello, I'm here and I'm going to defend Wraith because he's my scum buddy".

Can you please explain your case on me because I'm completely lost as to what it is. Are you seriously advocating my lynch because I OMGUS voted someone RVing me? It was clearly a return joke-vote, and basically the RV that he was voting me for not making. Do you really believe that I would in all seriousness OMGUS vote someone on a joke-vote and label it "OMGUS VOTE"?

I repear, If it were a true OMGUS vote, do you really think I would label it as such?

As far as the SGR lynch topic goes, of course this will be biased, but when I see someone defend a player who was not in need of a defense at the time (Yes, I did not need anyone to stick up for me because the votes on me make no sense and I consider them non-threatening at this time), I tend to think it is scum trying to buddy-up with a townie that they see as a likely lynch in an attempt to gain town-points. I think that scum-babying is incredibly obvious and would be avoided at all costs by scum.

[WrathChild]

Unless something really funky happens I foresee always electing myself.

How do you feel about those who have elected so far and not elected themselves?

They obviously don't have the same hyper-inflated sense of self worth that I have. Not everyone can be this awesome.

If you have confidence in your game, you should want to be a part of the masonry each night. Not doing so is simply limiting your interactions, which is always scummy.

Fair enough. One final question: Do you think we should nominate ourselves to go backstage, or seeing as we are two, should weallow those who have only one head the chance to bounce reads around?

I actually think this is a very good idea. Who are you two again?

[WrathChild]

will read the thread and post tomorrow, no time now.

Awesome Avatar. You may have noticed my screenname is Maiden-Born as well. Final Frontier was surprisingly good.

[animorpherv1]

@Wrath: I'm not explaining because you obviously didn't read and/or comprehend.

[A Gaggle of Geese]

Unless something really funky happens I foresee always electing myself.

How do you feel about those who have elected so far and not elected themselves?

They obviously don't have the same hyper-inflated sense of self worth that I have. Not everyone can be this awesome.

If you have confidence in your game, you should want to be a part of the masonry each night. Not doing so is simply limiting your interactions, which is always scummy.

Fair enough. One final question: Do you think we should nominate ourselves to go backstage, or seeing as we are two, should weallow those who have only one head the chance to bounce reads around?

I actually think this is a very good idea. Who are you two again?

We are chesskid3 and Faraday.

[WrathChild]

Elect farside22, Ythill, LlamaFluff

Because I trust their judgement. Even if Llama is policy voting me. It's an early D1 vote. I'm not worried. Wraith's vote is stupid, and unless I see some underlying scum reason to OMGUS vote a voter who random voted him (extremely unlikely), then I'll ignore it.

I stand by my Wraith vote, however.

All Wraith has done so far is explain how many games he's been in, defend himself and give us a very tiny amount of meta.

I'd also be up for an SGR lynch, however. That post on D2 just screams "Hello, I'm here and I'm going to defend Wraith because he's my scum buddy".

What do you expect me to do? There has been like 40 posts, I'm getting voted for no reason, and meta?

You're upset about my vote on you? You seem a bit sensitive about it. I explained this once and I'll explain it again:

vote:WraithChild

for forgetting to random vote.

Ok, very funny Random Vote. I got it. If you are serious about this reason, I already addressed that. I assumed you weren't serious:

vote:WraithChild

for forgetting to random vote.

OMGUS VOTE: Ani

So since you reminded me I forgot to RV, I thought it would be funny to RV you. To make that even more obvious I labeled it OMGUS. It seems to me that you are honestly OMGUS voting me for joke OMGUS voting you.

[WrathChild]

I actually think this is a very good idea. Who are you two again?

We are chesskid3 and Faraday.

I like the idea of a Hydra Backstage

Elect: Gaggle

[animorpherv1]

Dear WC, please learn to not skim:

Elect farside22, Ythill, LlamaFluff

Because I trust their judgement. Even if Llama is policy voting me. It's an early D1 vote. I'm not worried. Wraith's vote is stupid, and unless I see some underlying scum reason to OMGUS vote a voter who random voted him (extremely unlikely), then I'll ignore it.

I stand by my Wraith vote, however. All Wraith has done so far is explain how many games he's been in, defend himself and give us a very tiny amount of meta.

I'd also be up for an SGR lynch, however. That post on D2 just screams "Hello, I'm here and I'm going to defend Wraith because he's my scum buddy".

[SGRaaize]

I just meant that we need to base these votes off reads and that the people voting already ARE NOT basing their votes off reads, but instead voting on the poster, but this is a pretty bad way to go about considering the whole random distribution thing.

I get what you mean.
On the other hand, there are certain players that won't help us even if they are Townies and there are certain players that will end up helping Town a little even if they are Mafia just by trying to look Townie.
So, at the end, we gotta end balancing between the two

[SGRaaize]

I'd also be up for an SGR lynch, however. That post on D2 just screams "Hello, I'm here and I'm going to defend Wraith because he's my scum buddy".

I lol'd
I immediatly

FOS

you (Dohohohoh, OMGUS) because you actually think for a second that Scum would not only buddy on their scumpartner, but do it as openly, cleanly and quickly as now.
If I do end up getting lynched... may god have mercy on Town's soul

As far as the SGR lynch topic goes, of course this will be biased, but when I see someone defend a player who was not in need of a defense at the time (Yes, I did not need anyone to stick up for me because the votes on me make no sense and I consider them non-threatening at this time), I tend to think it is scum trying to buddy-up with a townie that they see as a likely lynch in an attempt to gain town-points. I think that scum-babying is incredibly obvious and would be avoided at all costs by scum.

Its not so much as me defending you as me trying to get the logic behind your lynch so I can kill you

[WrathChild]

Dear WC, please learn to not skim:

Elect farside22, Ythill, LlamaFluff

Because I trust their judgement. Even if Llama is policy voting me. It's an early D1 vote. I'm not worried. Wraith's vote is stupid, and unless I see some underlying scum reason to OMGUS vote a voter who random voted him (extremely unlikely), then I'll ignore it.

I stand by my Wraith vote, however. All Wraith has done so far is explain how many games he's been in, defend himself and give us a very tiny amount of meta.

I'd also be up for an SGR lynch, however. That post on D2 just screams "Hello, I'm here and I'm going to defend Wraith because he's my scum buddy".

I addressed all of these issues. What's your deal?

#1: I was joking with the OMGUS
#2: I was asked how many games I have been in. Should I have not answered?
#3: Defend myself? My ISO #4 I express confussion why I'm being attacked and then switch to some discussion of our game mechanics.
#4: I have done a lot more than what you have listed and a lot more than the majority of the players in this game at this point. Read my ISO. You are basically mudslinging right now and I'm pretty sure it's becuase you see me as an easy target. Which is exactly why my vote is staying where it is for now.

[WrathChild]

I'd also be up for an SGR lynch, however. That post on D2 just screams "Hello, I'm here and I'm going to defend Wraith because he's my scum buddy".

I lol'd
I immediatly

FOS

you (Dohohohoh, OMGUS) because you actually think for a second that Scum would not only buddy on their scumpartner, but do it as openly, cleanly and quickly as now.
If I do end up getting lynched... may god have mercy on Town's soul

As far as the SGR lynch topic goes, of course this will be biased, but when I see someone defend a player who was not in need of a defense at the time (Yes, I did not need anyone to stick up for me because the votes on me make no sense and I consider them non-threatening at this time), I tend to think it is scum trying to buddy-up with a townie that they see as a likely lynch in an attempt to gain town-points. I think that scum-babying is incredibly obvious and would be avoided at all costs by scum.

Its not so much as me defending you as me trying to get the logic behind your lynch so I can kill you

Haha fair enough.

[Seacore]

Wrath. Stop defending yourself.

If you are town, and I have no significant read on you yet, but if you are town you are doing no good in defending yourself. You are going to make the next 5 pages all about you and waste our time.
Instead, scum hunt. If you are scum, your scum hunting should suck, and we'll catch you. If you are town, actually do the town some good.

Also, 0/0 is not 100%, but that's a separate issue.

[WrathChild]

Wrath. Stop defending yourself.

If you are town, and I have no significant read on you yet, but if you are town you are doing no good in defending yourself. You are going to make the next 5 pages all about you and waste our time.
Instead, scum hunt. If you are scum, your scum hunting should suck, and we'll catch you. If you are town, actually do the town some good.

Also, 0/0 is not 100%, but that's a separate issue.

That's the very reason I'm keeping my vote on Ani. At the point he posted that all I do is defend myself, I had only done so one time and even calling that a defense was borderline, when it really was just me expressing confusion as to why I was being attacked. This was blatant mudslinging by Ani and that is what I am trying to convey here. Look at your post for example, you immediately tell me to stop defending myself, which I'm trying to do but because of Ani's mudsling it keeps being brought up and up again.

If you read my ISO, you'll see that I have started scum-hunting, but you can't expect glorious scum-hunting results when we have barely left the RVS. If you read the suspicions I've posted so far you'll see that they have a lot more substance than the suspicions that are being raised against me.

You're right on the 0/0, I'm gonna fix that. Thanks NERD!

[animorpherv1]

@WC:

Then explain what you've done. I've read all the posts and that's all I see. Also, I did not mention your OMGUS vote as a reason I think you're scummy.

lrn2understand.

[WrathChild]

@WC:

Then explain what you've done. I've read all the posts and that's all I see. Also, I did not mention your OMGUS vote as a reason I think you're scummy.

lrn2understand.

ISO #4: I question those jumping to discussing a mechanic that we can't even use yet and should be obvious when to use. I question the people voting for Backstagers this early. I ask a very good question to the Mod about Twilight voting for backstage.

ISO #5-6: I question why SGR is so willing to trust certain people this early.

-YOU ACCUSE ME OF ONLY DEFENDING MYSELF, posts after that do not justify your accusation at the time.

ISO #10: I accuse you of true OMGUS voting my joke OMGUS vote. I also express concern that SGR may be buddying with the likely easy mis-lynch to earn town points.

ISO #11 and #14: I support the idea of a Hydra in the Backstage

Now can you take a minute and compare that with what some of the other players have done?

Thanks, I'm done with you for now.

lrn2read

[A Gaggle of Geese]

You are going to make the next 5 pages all about you and waste our time.

Try 10-20.

Wrath. You've made your point. Please calm down, go for a walk, watch an episode of law and order, etc.
Then come back and make a case on someone. It doesn't have to be airtight (and obviously can't be) (inb4 Saint calls using parenthesis a scumtell), but it should show that you are analyzing the posts in the thread.

In other news,

Elect: Ghostlin

Elect: Seacore

[SGRaaize]

I'm still more curious on the beginning of this shitstorm instead of its current state.
What exactly, did Ythill see that could lead to a lynch on WrathChild.
Not only that, but he's not the only one thinking this, this isn't a insane idea in his mind, people are agreeing with him.

I just want to know:

What's so scummy about the first three posts from WrathChild?

[WrathChild]

I totally agree with you Gaggle, just when someone asks me something I answer and when someone insults me I answer too.

That being said, I'd like people to attach explanations to the Backstage votes, because I'm pretty sure the votes at this point are mostly based off Meta stuff that I do not know.

[OhGodMyLife]

Guys, SGRaaize is scum, lets get him