Meh, people are overblowing the case on mb53 imo, which waaaaaay lessens my confidence in my suspicions on him. I think the "why didn't you say anything about
him
doing what I did" was a legitimate question that deserved a legitimate answer (since I don't think he understood what I was attacking him most for, and to be fair I don't think I was very clear about it in my initial post against him). I also think he's handled the sudden extra votes on him in the way I'd expect a townie to - analyzing the votes on his own wagon, calling out flimsy cases.
PatB's case just looks like he was skimming, or looking at posts out-of-context or something. (Again, I think the "why didn't you say anything about him doing that" was a legit question given hindsight and context, assuming he thought I was putting emphasis on his non-suspicion of Lelouch when in fact I was putting emphasis on his "RVSing for the reactions" thing). Dekes didn't even
give
a reason (and can't even claim to be doing anything other than sheeping on PatB's case, since he thinks Lelouch is town and I'm "a good vote").
The only thing that still stands against him in my mind is the "I was still RVSing for the reactions" bit. Which is still obv bad since it was my reason for calling him out like I did in the first place, but definitely not bad enough for me to switch my vote especially given my read on the people who've jumped on him since calling him out.
Meanwhile, Lelouch is still scum and I am
not
moving my vote from him under any circumstances. I'm planning on revealing why, exactly, sometime in the next day or two... but in the meantime, know I am 95% sure of my vote which isn't generally the kind of thing I say lightly.
